Sound Field Testing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Sound Field Testing

Description:

Title: Aided Soundfield Testing Author: Amy McLauchlan Last modified by: Ed Brown Created Date: 11/26/2003 12:43:49 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: AmyMcLa8
Category:
Tags: field | praise | sound | testing | word

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sound Field Testing


1
Sound Field Testing
  • MCHAS TEAM

Wave 4 SFR 17/05/04
2
What can aided sound field thresholds tell us?
3
Aided Thresholds
A
A
A
A
A
4
Limitations
  • Relies on valid behavioural response

5
Limitations
  • Limited frequency resolution

VS
6
Limitations
  • No information on real ear output characteristics
    HA

X
X
X
X
X
X
A
A
A
A
7
Limitations
  • Poor test-retest reliability
  • Need at least 15 dB difference between conditions
    before significant effect (Hawkins 1985).

A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
8
Limitations
  • Provide little indication of speech audibility,
    especially when using WDRC.

Seewald 2003
9
Limitations
  • Inaccurate in regions of normal hearing

X
X
A
A
A
A
A
A
X
X
X
X
10
So what information is provided?
  • An indication of the childs/infants auditory
    performance
  • Good visual/auditory demonstration to parents
    between no hearing aids vs hearing aids.

11
A word of caution
  • Be aware of possible interactions with hearing
    aid features.
  • Number of channels
  • Compression speed
  • Noise algorithms
  • Active feedback control

12
A word of caution
  • Take care in testing setup
  • Loudspeaker listener in calibrated positions
  • Quiet room
  • No movement
  • Ascending warble tones
  • Stimulus duration approx 1 sec
  • 5 dB steps
  • Inter-stimulus interval of at least 5 sec
  • Individual ear information

Nelson 2003 AAA
13
A word of caution
  • A 5 year old child with a 90-100 dB flat loss is
    fitted with a power WDRC DSP hearing (no volume
    control) analogue linear power hearing aid with
    volume control. Would you expect any differences?

10
0
A
A
10
A
A
A
20
30
A
A
Linear aid volume control had been increased
prior to testing.
A
A
A
40
50
Hearing Threshold
60
70
80
WDRC DSP Aid
90
100
110
120
130
140
.125
.25
.5 1 2
4
8

Frequency (Hz)
Nelson 2003 AAA
14
What the Aided Threshold is and is not
  • IS -index to reflect softest perceptible sound
    w/o vc
  • -Functional gain reflects gain for softest
    sound (not conversational level)
  • IS NOT
  • -Reflect gain for any input level other than
    soft
  • -Reflect gain for conversational sounds
  • -Reflect loudness comfort
  • -Reflect processing of DSP aids eg. NR etc
  • Kuk, F
  • (AAA 2004)

15
What Real-Ear Measure is and is not
  • IS-Allows determination of physical output of
    hearing aid at different input levels Gain for
    conversational, soft and loud sounds
  • Effect of signal processing eg.compression, NR
    etc
  • IS NOT-A perceptual response ie. Does not tell
    how soft a child can hear
  • -cannot predict aided threshold
  • Kuk, F
  • (AAA 2004)

16
So, should we be using both for a fuller picture?
  • Perhaps
  • If so, what should be the optimal aided
    threshold?
  • Depends on criteria
  • Importance of hearing soft or low level input
  • sounds and meaningfulness of these
  • Degree of hearing loss and possible dead
  • regions
  • Limitations of hearing aid (as discussed)

17
THANK-YOU!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com