Title: Evolution 0.9: The Evolution of the U.S. Peering Ecosystem
1Evolution 0.9The Evolution of the U.S. Peering
Ecosystem
- William B. Norton
- Co-Founder Chief Technical Liaison
- Equinix, Inc.
Gigabit Peering Forum VII Herndon, VA September
9, 2003
2Internet Researcher
- Four Years of Research
- Document Internet Operations Practices
Interconnect/Peering/IXes/etc. - Research Process Focus with Community and
- Write White Paper version M.m
- Walk throughs Feedback
- Fix/Update Paper
- 200 Walkthroughs later a document reflecting
community Internet Operations knowledge
So far 6 White Papers
3Internet Operations White Papers
- Interconnection Strategies for ISPs
- Internet Service Providers and Peering
- A Business Case for Peering
- The Art of Peering The Peering Playbook
- The Peering Simulation Game
- Do ATM-based Internet Exchanges Make Sense
Anymore?
Freely available. Send e-mail to wbn_at_equinix.com
New white Paper The Evolution of the U.S.
Peering Ecosystem, Agenda
4Agenda
- The Evolution of the Internet Peering Ecosystem
- The Internet Peering Ecosystem Environment
- Each Player, their Motivations, their Behavior
- Four Major Events, led to
- Three Major Evolutions in the Peering Ecosystem
5The Evolution of the U.S. Peering Ecosystem
6The Internet Peering Ecosystem
- The Environment
- The Players
- Their role in the Peering Ecosystem
- Their behavior in the Peering Ecosystem
- Their relationship to others in the Peering
Ecosystem - The Evolution of the Peering Ecosystem
7The Internet Peering Ecosystem
- Many Internet Regions (usually defined by
geopolitical boundaries) - Each with its own Peering Ecosystem consisting of
- Tier 1 ISPs
- Tier 2 ISPs
- Content Players
- and Enterprises
8Interconnect Regions
- Large Internet Regions have multiple geographical
areas where ISPs peer
9Player Tier 1 ISPs
Def A Tier 1 ISP is an ISP that has access to
the entire Regional Internet routing table solely
through Peering Relationships (I.e. doesnt buy
transit from anyone).
10Tier 1 Peering
- Full Mesh Peering among Tier 1 ISPs within each
Interconnect Region
11Some Tier 1 ISPs in the U.S.
12Tier 1 Peering Across the U.S.
8 Interconnect Regions
13Tier 1 Peering Motivations
- Generally not interested to peer with anyone else
- They already get the traffic for free
- They may be foregoing revenue (they could sell
transit) - They dont want to give away that which
differentiates them
14Player Tier 2 ISP
- Def A Tier 2 ISP is an ISP that purchases (and
therefore resells) transit within an Internet
Region.
15Tier 2 ISP Peering Motivations
- Reduce transit costs
- Improve Performance
- Greater control over routing
16Tier 2 Peering
- Sparse Mesh Peering in each Interconnect Region
17Tier 2 ISPs
- Widely varying characteristics and behaviors
- Scope Global, National, Regional, Local
- Underfunded to well funded
- Food fights to solid relationships within the
community - Big Peoples Table and Little Peoples Table
perhaps a bad generalization
18The Content Provider and Enterprise Player
- Always buy transit
- Focus on Content
- Focus on Service
- Few Network Engineers
- SLAs valuable
19The Internet Peering Ecosystem
20Peering Inclinations and Peering Policies
- Def A Peering Inclination is a predilection
towards or against peering as demonstrated by
Peering behavior in a Peering Ecosystem - Def A Peering Policy documents and defines the
prerequisites to peering.
21Four types of Peering Inclination
- Open Peering Anyone, Anywhere
- Selective Peering Some Requirements
- Restrictive Peering No
- No Peering No, prefer buying transit
22The Evolution of the U.S. Peering Ecosystem
23Evolution of the U.S. Peering Ecosystem
- Four key events leading to drastic disruption in
the Peering Ecosystem - The 1999/2000 Telecom Collapse
- The growth of the Used Equipment Market
- The Upstream Provider for the Cable Companies
(_at_Home) went bankrupt - Peer-to-Peer file sharing systems (like Kazaa)
grow in popularity, traffic grows exponentially
between Access Providers (1.5MB MP3 ? 700MB AVI
files)
Leads to 3 Major Evolutions
24Evolution 1 Cable Companies are Peering
- 40 of traffic Kazaa
- 3-5 Gbps of transit traffic-gt Gbps of peering
potential ! - Significant because
- Volume
- Open Peering
- Kazaa Effect
25U.S. Cable Companies Eyeballs
26AOL
271998-2000
Tier 1 ISPs
Transit
Tier 2 ISPs
Thickness represents In-Group Peering
Content
282000-2003 Evolution 1 Cable Companies Peering
Tier 1 ISPs
CableCos
Peering
Tier 2 ISPs
Content
29Evolution 2 Network Savvy Large Scale Content
Companies get into Peering
- To reduce transit costs
- To improve the end user experience
- They need to move out of bankrupt colo anyway
- Significant because
- Volume of traffic is huge
- Content Providers have Open Peering
- Leading players pave the way
301998-2000
Tier 1 ISPs
Transit
Tier 2 ISPs
Thickness represents In-Group Peering
Content
312000-2003 Evolution 2 Large Scale Network
Savvy Content Peers
Tier 1 ISPs
Tier 2 ISPs
LSNSC
Content
32Other Broadband Players
- Significant, but
- Not Open Peers so disincentive to peer
- So less volume and less disruptive
33Evolution 3 Cable Companies Freely Peer with
Content Companies
- Content literally on the Cable Company Network
- Lowest possible latency from content to eyeballs
- Internet Gaming, Broadband Streaming, etc.
341998-2000
Tier 1 ISPs
Transit
Tier 2 ISPs
Thickness represents In-Group Peering
Content
352000-2003 Evolution 1 Cable Companies Peering
Tier 1 ISPs
CableCos
Tier 2 ISPs
Content
362000-2003 Evolution 2 Large Scale Network
Savvy Content Peers
Tier 1 ISPs
Tier 2 ISPs
LSNSC
Content
372000-2003 Evolution 3 Cable Peers with Large
Scale Network Savvy Content
Tier 1 ISPs
CableCos
Tier 2 ISPs
LSNSC
Content
38International Dynamics Separate White Paper
JP
U.S.
U.S. Tier 1 ISPs are Tier 2 ISPs in Japan
Internet Region Japan Tier 1 ISPs are Tier 2 ISPs
in the U.S. Internet Region
39Summary
2003 Peering Ecosystem Evolving
NoPeering Open Selective Restrictive
Lg.Content
Tier2 ISPs
CableCos
RBOCs
Tier 1 ISPs
Foreign ISPs
Excite_at_Home