Using Regression Analysis to Assess Potential Effect Modifiers and Confounders - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Using Regression Analysis to Assess Potential Effect Modifiers and Confounders

Description:

Title: Using Regression Analysis to Assess Potential Effect Modifiers and Confounders Author: Gordon Hilton Fick Last modified by: Gordon Hilton Fick – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:163
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: GordonHi8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Using Regression Analysis to Assess Potential Effect Modifiers and Confounders


1
Using Regression Analysis to Assess Potential
Effect Modifiers and Confounders
  • Y (blood pressure reduction)

2
Question
  • Does the effect of the drug on Mean BPR depend on
    the gender of the patient?
  • It turns out that we can build a model to address
    this question.

3
Implications of this model
  • By specializing the model to the females and then
    to the males we can see
  • Measures the difference between the 2 drug
    effects
  • i.e. whether gender is an effect modifier

4
Sometimes a table can aid in understanding the
implications of a model



5
Assess effect modification first
  • If gender is a modifier, its assessment as a
    confounder is rarely relevant.
  • If there is evidence that then one
    should present the gender specific estimates of
    the drug effect (together with their SEs and
    maybe CIs too)
  • No further testing of the components of this
    model is typically required.
  • Since we know that we then know that
    the drug has an effect and that the effect
    DEPENDS on the gender of the patient.

6
What if gender is not an effect modifier?
  • And we can then assess whether gender is a
    confounder by comparing
  • With

7
In other words
  • By studying the context, using confidence
    intervals and other epidemiological ideas

8
What if the potential modifier/confounder is
continuous? Say age
  • Now look at
  • As 2 straight lines in age
  • And so the drug effect is the difference

9
(No Transcript)
10
Age specific drug effect
  • From the previous graph
  • Compare the vertical difference between the red
    line and the blue line when ld 3 with the
    vertical difference when ld 7.
  • For example, red minus blue (drug effect) is
    about -3 (when ld3) and a bit more than 2 (when
    ld7)
  • The next graph shows the drug effect (de)
    versus ld demonstrating that ld is a modifier.

11
(No Transcript)
12
The next graph shows
  • A Drug effect adjusted for ld
  • Notice that the 2 lines are parallel and that the
    drug effect (red line minus blue line) is the
    same for any value of ld
  • This fixed difference is the adjusted drug
    effect

13
(No Transcript)
14
Crude drug effect
  • In the next graph, the 2 lines are horizontal (to
    emphasize that the effect is NOT adjusted for ld)
  • In this illustration, the adjusted effect and
    crude effect are nearly the same and hence there
    is no evidence of confounding
  • Remember, though, that if we had demonstrated
    modification, we would not even address the issue
    of confounding

15
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com