Choice and healthy eating - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 58
About This Presentation
Title:

Choice and healthy eating

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Last modified by: Shannon Robalino Created Date: 1/1/1601 12:00:00 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Other titles – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:251
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 59
Provided by: sephoOrgU
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Choice and healthy eating


1
Choice and healthy eating
  • Geof Rayner PhD FFPH
  • Visiting Research Fellow
  • City University
  • GR Associates public health consultancy
  • Geof_at_GRAssociates.net

2
This presentation
  • Asks why making healthy choices is so difficult
    when society is richer than ever before. Suggests
    that food problems are not just about food.
  • Proposes that consumer marketplace leads to
    paradoxes of food choice
  • Says that obesity is the visible indictor of a
    general social problem made into a medical
    problem
  • Examines what has been called by Popkin the
    Nutrition Transition one of the best
    explanatory models of what is happening to diet
    and nutrition
  • Considers briefly - the strategy developed in
    the white paper
  • Examines what could be done in the public sector
    right now .

3
Why is making healthy choices so difficult?
4
Why are Ben and Jerrys icecream, ciggies, booze,
chocolate, etc so difficult to resist?
5
Why are we producing fewer apples? Why are they
expensive?
6
Question How do you attract the attention of
someone with a weight problem?
7
The Obesity crisis.. For cats
8
Inserting brands into the minds of children
9
The power of brands
10
Linking one brand to another
11
Linking one brand to another
12
The Hastings Report (FSA)
  • there is a lot of food advertising to children
  • the advertised diet is less healthy than the
    recommended one
  • children enjoy and engage with food promotion
  • food promotion is having an effect, particularly
    on childrens preferences, purchase behaviour and
    consumption
  • this effect is independent of other factors and
    operates at both a brand and category level.

13
Ads the public view
14
Ofcoms view
  • Ofcoms view is that it does not believe a total
    ban on food advertising to children would be
    proportionate or effective.
  • But evidence points the need to do something..

15
Can we really choose?
  • .. There may be no sharp line between behaviour
    that is a matter of free choice that implies
    personal responsibility for the consequences and
    behaviour or outcomes that are due to inherent
    qualities over which the individual has no
    control.
  • Jeff Strnad, Conceptualizing the Fat Tax The
    Role of Food Taxes in Developed Economies,
    Stanford Law School, July 2004

16
Food paradoxes
  • Enormous subsidy for food production/ no
    assessment of subsidies in terms of health impact
  • Massive choice of the unhealthy foods/ Too
    little choice of the healthy foods, particularly
    for some of us
  • High consumption on ready prepared foods/ Too
    little (domestic) production and consumption of
    fresh foods
  • Massive propaganda for unhealthy foods/ Limited
    promotion of healthier range of foods or healthy
    food cultures

17
Paradoxes of our food choices .. A little list
  • Unhealthy foods are cheap/Healthy foods not cheap
    enough
  • Too many cooks on television/ Not enough cooks in
    the home
  • Food industry informs about diet and fitness (FDF
    Manifesto) /less eager to change products or
    marketing
  • Lots of talk around healthy diet for children
    (improving school meals)/Less action to create a
    healthy diet for children or protect children
    from food chain
  • Public sector major purchaser of, and setting
    for, food/ limited awareness as promoter of
    healthy food/healthy choices
  • Citizens are referred to as choosers or
    consumers/ we are not referred to as producers
    of health

18
Why are cheap calories so difficult to resist?
  • Effectiveness of advertising/marketing
  • Pervasiveness of snacking opportunities go to
    any WHS on any mainline station
  • Bounded rationality based on incomplete
    information
  • Cognitive errors linked to intertemporal choice
  • Income energy dense foods are cheap
  • Opportunity they are everywhere
  • Power consumerism is felt to be an expression
    of our personal power

19
  •  
  • The triumph of advertising in the culture
    industry is that consumers feel compelled to buy
    and use its products even though they see through
    them.
  •  
  • Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer. Dialetic of
    the Enlightenment (1944)

20
US and worldwide ad spend
Universal McCann 2004
21
Obesity converting social and economic trends
into medical problems
22
Weight gain a simple descriptive model
23
Obesity rising across OECD countries but
centred so far on Americas and Europe
24
Over consumption (USA) and underconsumption (LDCs)
  • Average US adult male consumes 154 of RDA for
    protein (97gms vs RDA of 63)
  • Average US adult female consumes 127
  • Average American derives 67 of protein from
    animal sources compared to 34 worldwide
  • WHO estimates more than 230 million (40) of LDC
    children are stunted
  • WHO also suggests that obesogenic factors in
    developed countries are taking root globally,
    even in LDCs

25
Impact in USA
  • Forty-year-old female nonsmokers lost 3.3
    years and 40-year-old male nonsmokers lost 3.1
    years of life expectancy because of overweight.
    Forty-year-old female nonsmokers lost 7.1 years
    and 40-year-old male nonsmokers lost 5.8 years
    because of obesity. When linked with another
    serious disease precursor, cigarette smoking,
    years of lost life doubled. Obese female smokers
    lost 13.3 years and obese male smokers lost 13.7
    years compared with normal-weight nonsmokers.

Peeters, A., et al., Obesity in Adulthood and Its
Consequences for Life Expectancy A Life-Table
Analysis. Ann Intern Med, 2003. 138(1) p. 24-32.
26
But .. obesity is not an inevitable result of
economic growth
Worlds five largest economies
11999 data 2 2001 data 3 2000 data
27
But.. We appear to be following America
28
The Nutrition Transition
29
A snapshot of the nutrition transition.. fast
foods vs pre-agrarian diet
Trenton G. Smith, Ph.D. University of Bonn, June
2003
30
Explanation for national/subnational differences
found in differential impact of obesogenic
drivers
  • Economic transitions
  • Dietary transitions
  • Lifestyle and cultural transitions.
  • Overlapping to form the Nutrition Transition
    (Popkin)
  • Plus - genetic, social class, employment, ethnic,
    and age-related vulnerabilities

31
Nutrition Transition
  • Shift from domestic food production and
    preparation to industrialised food production,
    preparation and distribution
  • Food overproduction and falling commodity prices
  • High levels of food sector subsidy (US and EU)
  • Emergence of strong international brands among
    obesogenic foods/drinks biggest world brand
    is a carbonated sugary drink

32
Nutrition Transition
  • Emergence of international brands biggest world
    brand is a carbonated sugary drink
  • Time poor domestic economy linked to
    outsourcing of domestic food preparation
  • Physically active occupations replaced by
    sedentary occupations
  • Sport recomposed as entertainment via
    commercialisation and linked to food marketing

33
Nutrition Transition
  • Marketing focused on energy dense foods which
    have limited satiation but are high in calories
    (eg Snickers bar has more calories than a meal of
    steak and vegetables)
  • Time poor domestic economy linked to
    outsourcing of domestic food preparation
  • Physically active occupations replaced by
    sedentary occupations
  • Sport recomposed as entertainment via
    commercialisation and linked to food marketing

34
European food subsidies
  • Over production of some foods
  • Production of less healthy or dangerous products
  • Underproduction of healthier range of products

35
A key element of the Transition the cheapening
of fat and sugar
  • In 2000, the CAP spent 32.6 billion in
    production subsidies, equal to just under half
    the entire EU budget
  • CAP results in over production of less healthy
    food constituents examples being sugar and fat
  • Underproduction - and underconsumption - of
    healthier range of products which receive no
    subsidy (e.g. apples). 60 of Euro FV imported
  • In 2000 food share of EU household budget 15
    compared with 30 in 1960

36
One consequence of CAP EU sugar exports
Source Oxfam 2004
37
US example sugar
38
US example soft drinks
39
US example food costs home and away
40
The McBreakfast
Coca Cola Carbonated water, sugar/glucose-fructos
e, caramel colour, phosphoric acid, natural
flavours (vegetable source), caffeine. 310
calories. McGriddle - 33 gms of fat, 260
milligrams of cholesterol, and 550 calories, 1250
gms salt (bacon, egg, sausage, processed cheese,
between two pancakes soaked in sugar syrup) Hash
Browns (2 oz) 10 gms total fat, 5 gms sat fat
350 mg salt, 134 calories (potatoes, a blend of
partially hydrogenated beef tallow and cottonseed
oil, corn starch, salt, corn flour, dextrose,
sodium acid pyrophosphate (added to preserve
natural colour), spices and cooked in an A/V
shortening blend. (Source McDonalds Corporation)
41
The public view concern and confusion
42
Will the white paper fix the problem?
43
Prime objective
  • Halting the growth in childhood obesity is our
    prime objective. We have set a national target to
    halt, by 2010, the year on year increase in
    obesity among children under 11 in the context of
    a broader strategy to tackle obesity in the
    population as a whole. This objective will be
    shared jointly by the government departments with
    responsibility for health, education and sport.
  •  

44
INTRODUCTION
  • Health is inextricably linked to the way people
    live their lives and the opportunities available
    to choose health in the communities where they
    live. This White Paper is about making a
    difference to the choices people make.

45
CONCLUSION
  • Meeting the new health challenges of the 21st
    century will need a step change in action.
    These arrangements reflect the need for
    Government, communities and
  • individuals to taken seriously their respective
  • responsibilities for health

46
On advertising to kids
  • In line with the research conclusions and the
    responses to the consultation, the Government
    considers there is a strong case for action to
    restrict further the advertising and promotion to
    children of those foods and drinks that are high
    in fat, salt and sugar

47
What should be done now, right now?
48
Getting the social marketing right
49
A quick win Change the face of the public sector
  • Audit provision, culture, belief to employees
    and users of services
  • Change the environment of choice not just the
    ideas in peoples heads. Smoking campaigning
    shows the way.
  • Use the White Paper to draw the environment of
    food to peoples attention
  • People understand the need to protect children.
    Highlight these examples first
  • If you feel intimidated by power system get
    NGOs and public to raise the questions.

50
Health promoting NHS?
51
Health promoting NHS?
52
Health promoting (Council) Leisure centre?
53
Health promoting NHS?
54
Health promoting social services/housing
department?
55
The health promoting school?
56
The health promoting celebrity?
57
The health promoting Department of Health?
58
Thanks!
  • Geof Rayner PhD FFPH
  • City University GRAssociates Geof_at_GRAssociates.n
    et
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com