The Role of the Internet in Education and Training: Medium to Long-Term Research Issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

The Role of the Internet in Education and Training: Medium to Long-Term Research Issues

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Default Last modified by: J Cook Created Date: 3/25/2000 8:51:28 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:243
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: Defa100
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Role of the Internet in Education and Training: Medium to Long-Term Research Issues


1
The Role of the Internet in Education and
TrainingMedium to Long-Term Research Issues
  • John Cook
  • j.cook_at_unl.ac.uk
  • http//www2.unl.ac.uk/exbzcookj/cook.html
  • Learning Technology Research Institute (LTRI)
    www.unl.ac.uk/ltri/
  • School of Informatics and Multimedia
    Technology, University of North London

2
Structure of talk
  • Aims and Scope of Talk.
  • Current Context.
  • Medium-Term Research Issues.
  • Long-Term Research Issues.
  • Conclusions.

3
Aims and Scope of Talk
  • My main message is that Community, Culture,
    Computing, Communication and Cognition should be
    investigated in future research.
  • Learning applies to training and education.

4
Current Context
  • Information Society Technologies (IST) programme.
  • KA III - Multimedia Content and Tools.
  • EUs eLearning initiative.
  • eUniversities, school of tommorrow and eCommerce,
    etc.

5
  • Christopher Galvin, President Motorola
  • We are not hiring any more graduates with four
    year degrees.
  • We want employees with forty year degrees.
  • (Quoted by Wilson, 2000)
  • Training and Development is a
  • 62 billion dollar industry in transition
  • corporate spending on Web training hit 600
    million in less than five years
  • expected to jump to 10 billion by 2002.
  • (Wilson, 2000)

6
  • Gavriel Salomon from the University of Haifa
  • with the Internet and multimedia, with its
    model-building and simulation capacities, with
    its email, hypertext, CMC and other unfathomable
    possibilities, seduces us to believe that it can
    do miracles Its introduction for learning
    purposes into classrooms, colleges, homes and
    even work places, is supposed to cause a major
    shift in education.
  • (Saloman, 2000)
  • However, Salomon and others in the field,
    including myself, are disappointed with the state
    of current research ...

7
  • One possible criticism of current research is
    that it has a tendency to investigate the
    optimisation of current practice
  • Are our expectations, and consequently the
    financial investments in educational computing,
    justified?
  • Some studies suggest that very little, if
    anything, has happened so far as a result of
    computing in education.
  • An anecdote attributed to Alan Kaye at an
    Ed-Media conference some years ago runs as
    follows.
  • We have a tendency to optimise the old, or
    current, ways of doing things, e.g. putting
    lecture notes on the web. We are only slowly
    finding new ways of doing things.

8
  • A second possible criticism of current research
    is that it has a technology centered focus.
  • A typical rationale that seems to underlie much
    research is What can we accomplish with our new
    technology?
  • Rarely do research papers start out from the
    learning perspective.
  • Of course there are always exceptions. Seymour
    Papert (1980) for example, put forward some
    powerful ideas on how to use computers to augment
    cognitive growth.

9
  • However, technology is often seen as the
    beginning and the justification for all
    rationales.
  • Rather than knowledge construction, the computer
    or the technology has tended to become the focus
    of attention. Why?
  • Computers hold a strong fascination for us. They
    are marketed like cars, they are even sexy!
    Teaching and learning strategies, unfortunately,
    cant compete.

10
  • A third concern is the choice of the wrong
    research questions.
  • For example, Does the use of learning technology
    X produce better learning results than
    traditional approach Y.
  • We have a tendency to keep repeating this
    car-racing paradigm.
  • Ideas of the interactive means by which different
    teachers promote learning or by which learners
    learn, nor ideas of ecological context, have had
    an impact on the vast majority of studies.

11
  • Another issue related to the third concern is the
    kinds of research outcomes we expect from the new
    media which we study.
  • New technologies are not just another means to
    attain the same old goals of traditional
    education.
  • Imagine that I had just discovered electricity
    and I decided to evaluate it in terms of its
    ability to light fires in the coal stoves.

12
  • Recent work at LTRI that has attempted to
    overcome some of these disappointments.
  • At the LTRI we have been involved in work that
    puts the educational vision first.
  • Internet based constructivist learning
    environments are being developed to promote
    multimedia students critical thinking and active
    learning (Boyle, 1997 Cook and Boyle, 2000
    Cook, 2000a).
  • The development of a pedagogical agent to foster
    musical creativity (Cook, 1998, Cook, 2000b
    Cook, 2000c).
  • Davis (2000) has examined CMC in the context of
    social and emotional factors in foreign language
    teaching.

13
Promoting active learning
14
Web-based critical arguments
15
Supporting musical creativity and problem-solving
16
Medium-Term Research Issues
  • Need multidisciplinary research teams.

17
  • The Internet affords new activities, new
    experiences, and new ways of encountering the
    world. We should therefore adopt new research
    goals.
  • Of course some good research has already been
    conducted in the areas I am about to specify, but
    we need to build upon this work.

18
  • How do we promote in our students and trainees
    the following abilities?
  • to cooperate and collaborate in groups,
  • to evaluate information critically,
  • to acquire life-long learning skills,
  • to construct higher-order knowledge
  • and probably above all else,
  • to be adaptive and creative when tackling new
    problems.

19
  • Research should test which learning environment
    is better for what purpose. For example
  • How compatible is remote learning via CMC with
    what we know, for example, about the difficulties
    of self-regulated learning for the lonely
    student?
  • Would we want to move socialisation away from the
    school-based peer group and into the family
    environment?
  • We also need more research into
  • issues surrounding the re-use of educational
    materials,
  • standards that enable good practice and materials
    to be exchanged and extended.

20
  • As well as some of the above issues, at the LTRI
    we are also interested in looking at
  • the theoretical basis of learning technology,
    i.e. establishing the foundations of an applied
    discipline of computer-assisted learning
  • design innovation based on the mapping of
    pedagogical theories onto the opportunities
    created by the rapid advances in learning
    technologies
  • methods for the development of computer-based
    learning that promote communities of inquiry,
    creativity and problem-solving
  • theory and practice for evaluation, which takes
    into account the requirements of different
    stakeholders
  • the influence of cultural differences on learning
    and assessment in e-universities.

21
Long-Term Research Issues
  • Gordon McCalla from University of Saskatchewan,
    Canada, has recently speculated on a research
    agenda in the context of localisation for the
    design of environments to support learning in the
    year 2010.
  • (McCalla 2000a, McCalla 2000b).

22
  • By then, the increasing universality of
    information technology will have so overloaded
    people with information that they will find it
    necessary to drastically constrain their
    interactions in cyberspace. The result will be a
    major trend to localization, not globalization.
    This localization will result in a fragmented
    social environment.
  • (McCalla 2000b, p. 177)

23
  • McCalla provides a useful perspective which seems
    focused on communication.
  • An alternative, but related perspective, is
    selective coherence, a theme in psychology.
  • How do you stop yourself being overwhelmed by
    information or communication demands?
  • Mastery and control are we being driven by
    technology or can we stay in control?

24
Conclusion
  • Future research could focus on combinations of
    some the following five Cs
  • Community, Culture, Computing Communication and
    Cognition.

25
  • Community
  • Localised villages, perhaps?
  • But, care is needed so as not to exclude
    individuals.
  • Culture
  • May be unique to a community or distributed.
  • Multidisciplinary approach needed to develop
    useful systems. Teams may include social,
    political and economic sciences as well as the
    more usual disciplines found in research teams.

26
  • Computing
  • Tools and technologies designed to support the
    above 2Cs and embedded in that context to help
    the learner.
  • A systems pedagogical goals may be implemented
    computationally.
  • Software without boundaries distributed
    ecological agents, active data, applications take
    on meaning relative to end-use, unpredictable
    behaviour of agents.

27
  • Communication
  • Inter and intra community.
  • Tools that guide individuals, groups and
    communities.
  • Cognition
  • Fragmented styles of teaching and learning,
    just-in-time teaching and learning.
  • Socially distributed cognition and socially
    appropriated knowledge.
  • Modelling (AI-ED) may merge with
    situated/constructivist approaches.

28
  • Endnote
  • We need to develop systems that
  • promote in learners openness and creativity,
  • that enable citizens to fulfil their potential,
    both personally and in their work lives.

This should in turn lead to computers, and
related technologies, that help to create a new
or modified culture. We need to use computers to
help build communities of intelligent life-long
learners who are guided by some community and
cultural values that transcend simple
self-interest.
29
References
  • Boyle T. (1997). Design for multimedia learning.
    Prentice Hall. Web site to complement the book,
    which is accessable at http//www.unl.ac.uk/simt/
    dfml/website/
  • Cook, J. and Boyle, T. (2000). Effective Delivery
    of On-Campus Networked Learning Reflections on
    Two Case-Studies. 2nd International Conference on
    Networked Learning, April 17 to 19th 2000,
    University of Lancaster.
  • Cook, J. (1998). Mentoring, Metacognition and
    Music Interaction Analyses and Implications for
    Intelligent Learning Environments. International
    Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education,
    9, 45-87.
  • Cook, J. (2000a). Designing web-based adaptive
    support for debate with dialogue modelling. Paper
    accepted for International Workshop on Advanced
    Learning Technologies, 4-6 December 2000,
    Palmerston North, New Zealand. Will appear in
    proceedings published by IEEE Computer Society
    Press.
  • Cook, J. (2000b). Cooperative problem-seeking
    dialogues in learning. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson
    and K. VanLehn (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring
    Systems 5th International Conference, ITS 2000
    Montréal, Canada, June 2000 Proceedings, (p.
    615-624). Berlin Heidelberg New York
    Springer-Verlag.
  • Cook, J. (2000c). Evaluation of a support tool
    for musical problem-seeking. ED-Media 2000 -
    World Conference on Educational Multimedia,
    Hypermedia Telecommunications. June 26-July 1,
    2000, Montréal, Canada. AACE.

30
  • Davis, M. (2000). Computer Mediated Communication
    as a Foreign Language Potential and Pitfalls in
    Cyberspace. Presented at the PALSO Conference,
    Panhellenic Federation of Foreign Language School
    Owners, Athens, Greece, August, 2000.
  • MacCalla , G. (2000a). Life and Learning in the
    Electronic Village The Importance of
    Localization for the Design of Environments to
    Support Learning. Invited talk given at
    Intelligent Tutoring Systems 5th International
    Conference, ITS 2000 Montréal, Canada, June 2000.
    Talk was based on MacCalla (2000b).
  • MacCalla , G. (2000b). The Fragmentation of
    Culture, Learning, Teaching and Technology
    Implications for the Artificial Intelligence in
    Education Research Agenda in 2010. International
    Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education,
    11, 177-196.
  • Papert, S. (1980), Mindstorms Children,
    Computers and Powerful Ideas. Harvester Press.
  • Salomon, G. (2000). Its not just the tool, but
    the educational rationale that counts. Invited
    keynote address at ED-Media 2000 - World
    Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia
    Telecommunications. June 26-July 1, 2000,
    Montréal, Canada. AACE.
  • Wilson, J. (2000). The Internet Tsunami -
    eLearning. Keynote Speaker at ALT-C 2000, 7th
    International Conference of the Association for
    Learning Technology, 11-13 September, UNMIST,
    Manchester.
  • Acknowledgement Thanks to Tom Boyle for making
    some useful comments, at very short notice, on
    this talk.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com