Fluctuations in ISM Thermal Pressures Measured from C I Observations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Fluctuations in ISM Thermal Pressures Measured from C I Observations

Description:

Title: Fluctuations in ISM Thermal Pressures Measured from C I Observations Author: Edward Jenkins Last modified by: Edward Jenkins Created Date – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: EdwardJ94
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fluctuations in ISM Thermal Pressures Measured from C I Observations


1
Fluctuations in ISM Thermal Pressures Measured
from C I Observations
  • Edward B. Jenkins
  • Princeton University Observatory

2
Fundamentals
  • Most of the free carbon atoms in the ISM are
    singly ionized, but a small fraction of the ions
    have recombined into the neutral form.
  • The ground electronic state of C I is split into
    three fine-structure levels with small energy
    separations.
  • Our objective is to study the relative
    populations of these three levels, which are
    influenced by local conditions (density
    temperature.

3
Fine-structure Levels in the Ground State of C I
Upper Electronic Levels
Optical Pumping (by Starlight)
Spontaneous Radiative Decays
E/k 62.4 K
C I
3P2 (E 43.4 cm-1, g 5)
Collisionally Induced Transitions
E/k 23.6 K
3P1 (E 16.4 cm-1, g 3)
C I
C I
3P0 (E 0 cm-1, g 1)
4
C I Absorption Features in the UV Spectrum of ?
Cep Recorded at a Resolution of 1.5 km s-1 by
STIS on HST
From Jenkins Tripp (2001 ApJS, 137, 297)
5
? Cep
C I
Column density per unit velocity 1013 cm-2 (km
s-1)-1
C I
C I
Velocity (km s-1)
6
Most Useful Way to Express Fine-structure
Population Ratios
  • n(C I)total n(C I) n(C I) n(C I)
  • f1 ? n(C I)/n(C I)total
  • f2 ? n(C I)/n(C I)total

f2
Then consider the plot
Collision partners at a given density and
temperature are expected to yield specific values
of f1 and f2
f1
7
Collisional Excitation by Neutral H
T 100 K
n(H) 105 cm-3
n(H) 104 cm-3
n(H) 1000 cm-3
n(H) 100 cm-3
n(H) 10 cm-3
8
Collisional Excitation by Neutral H Plus Optical
Pumping by the Average Galactic Starlight Field
n(H) 104 cm-3
n(H) 1000 cm-3
n(H) 100 cm-3
n(H) 10 cm-3
9
Collisional Excitation by Neutral H Plus Optical
Pumping by 10X the Average Galactic Starlight
Field
n(H) 104 cm-3
n(H) 1000 cm-3
n(H) 100 cm-3
n(H) 10 cm-3
10
Tracks for Different Temperatures
T 240 K
T 120 K
n(H) 100 cm-3
T 60 K
T 30 K
11
Tracks for Different Temperatures
T 240 K
T 120 K
p/k 104 cm-3 K
T 60 K
T 30 K
12
(Back to simple f1f2 diag.)
13
A Theorem on how to deal with superpositions
Cloud 2
Cloud 1
14
C I-weighted Center of Mass gives Composite
f1,f2
A Theorem on how to deal with superpositions
15
Allowed Region for Composite Results
P/k ? ?
16
Results
  • Original observations reported by Jenkins Tripp
    (2001) included 21 stars.
  • We have now expanded this survey to about 100
    stars by downloading from the MAST archive all
    suitable STIS observations that used the highest
    resolution echelle spectrograph (E140H).
  • The archival results have somewhat lower velocity
    resolution because the standard entrance aperture
    was usually used (instead of the extremely narrow
    slit chosen for the Jenkins Tripp survey).

17
Composite over all velocities and stars f1
0.217, f2 0.073
18
H II reg.
T 160K
T 80K
T 40K
T 20K
Note HISA-land is down here
19
Kinematics
? Cep
VDifferential Galactic Rotation
VLSR
C I
Target
Column density per unit velocity 1013 cm-2 (km
s-1)-1
Sun
C I
C I
Velocity (km s-1)
(heliocentric)
Positive Velocities
Allowed Velocities
Negative Velocities
20
Allowed Velocities
Composite f1 0.203, f2 0.063
21
Positive Velocities
Negative Velocities
Composite f1 0.231, f2 0.082 for both
velocity intervals
22
Barytropic index
?eff 0.72
(Wolfire, Hollenbach, McKee, Tielens Bakes
1995, ApJ 443, 152)
23
Gamma_eff on f1f2 (0.72)
24
Gamma_eff on f1f2 (0.72, 0.90)
25
Log-normal Distribution of Mass vs. Density
Relative Mass Fraction
n(H I) (cm-3)
26
Log-normal distribution of H I mass fraction vs.
n(H), with ?eff 5/3
Observed composite f1, f2
27
Log-normal distribution of H I mass fraction vs.
n(H), with ?eff 5/3
28
Log-normal distribution of H I mass fraction vs.
n(H), with ?eff 5/3
29
Log-normal distribution of H I mass fraction vs.
n(H), with ?eff 5/3
30
Log-normal distribution of H I mass fraction vs.
n(H), with ?eff 5/3
31
Log-normal distribution of H I mass fraction vs.
n(H), with ?eff 5/3
32
Model for a random mixture of high and low
pressure gas
Obs.
Obs.
33
Pressure Distribution Function
Note The width of this peak is a lower limit,
since the observations at each velocity probably
exhibit some averaging of pressure extremes along
the straight portion of the f1-f2 curve.
H I mass fraction
Relative Mass Fraction
The width and central pressure of this peak are
not well known, but the height of the peak is
well determined.
p/k (cm-3 K)
34
Pressure Distribution Function
H I mass fraction
C I mass fraction
Relative Mass Fraction
p/k (cm-3 K)
35
A Question to Consider About the High Pressure
Component
  • Could this component arise simply from the action
    of radiation or mass loss from the target stars
    (or their associations) either of which could
    compress the gas?
  • Probably not recall that negative velocity
    material behaved in much the same way as positive
    velocity material

Except for some gas parcels that have only high
pressures
36
HS06246907
Galactic Coordinates l 145.7, b 23.4
Nearest O- or B-type star to the line of sight
43 Cam (V 5.14, spectral type B7IV), about 2
away
37
Implications on the Existence of Small Neutral
Stuctures
Tcool 2,500 yr
Rapid Compression
Tcool 15,000 yr (for T 60 K)
Relative Mass Fraction
p/k (cm-3 K)
38
Implications on the Existence of Small Neutral
Stuctures
  • High pressure component mass fraction is low
    (10-3), relative to most of the gas.
  • It has n(H I) 103 -104 cm-3 and T 100 K.
  • Tcool 2500 yr, which implies a typical
    dimension of only 0.00025 pc (i.e., 50 AU), or
    less, if crossing-time velocities are of order 10
    km s-1 and the compression is nearly adiabatic.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com