Diapositiva 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Diapositiva 1

Description:

Title: Diapositiva 1 Author: vandesande Last modified by: Preferred Customer Created Date: 8/1/2006 11:42:53 AM Document presentation format: Presentazione su schermo ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: vand104
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diapositiva 1


1
ICT VII Programma Quadro e ICT PSP modalità di
partecipazione
Daniela Mercurio NCP ICT e ICT PSP APRE Pescara -
26 Marzo 2010
2
Servizi offerti da APRE- NCP
  • Assistenza prima della presentazione della
    proposta
  • Telefonica, email e vis à vis in APRE per
  • Identificazione del tema
  • Verifica eleggibilità della proposta
  • Revisione della proposta (Parte A e B)
  • Utilizzo EPSS
  • Revisione Consortium Agreement
  • Informazione
  • Convegni
  • News alert
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Sito internet e intranet www.apre.it

Ricerca Partner
DallIDEA
Alla conclusione del contratto
  • Formazione
  • Gestione amministrativa
  • Progettazione Europea
  • Comunicazione della ricerca
  • IPR e Consortium Agreement
  • Assistenza post
  • Assistenza nella
  • Negoziazione
  • Gestione dei progetti
  • Diffusione dei risultati
  • Reportistica

3
Sportelli
18 Distribuiti in tutta Italia
UNIONCAMERE ABRUZZO Unione Regionale Camere di
Commercio, Industria, Artigianato ed Agricoltura
d'Abruzzoc/o Palazzo Camera di Commercio di
Teramo
4
(No Transcript)
5
The ICT Policy Support programme
  • Single information space
  • Access to services, interoperability, digital
    content, security and governance
  • Innovation and investment in ICT
  • Promoting best use of ICTs in SMEs and public
    services, skills, partnerships and investment
  • Inclusive information society
  • Accessibility, privacy, quality and availability
    of public interest services

6
Who can participate?
7
Funding instruments
  • Pilot A Building on initiatives in member
    states / associated countries with
    interoperability of services as central theme
  • Pilot B Stimulating innovative use of ICT in
    public private sector (under realistic
    conditions)
  • Thematic Network (TN) Mobilisation/Exchanges
    between practitioners policy makers
  • Best practice network (BPN) Combining consensus
    building / awareness raising / large scale
    implementation
  • only for supporting Digital library

8
PILOT TYPE A
9
PILOT TYPE B
Main features of Pilots Type B
  • The goal is to carry out a implementation of an
    ICT based innovative service carried out under
    realistic conditions. Replication and wide
    validation of best practices can be specified in
    objective.
  • The emphasis is on fostering innovation in
    services ? the pilot may need to take-up
    completed RD work, may extend already tested
    prototype services or may combine / integrate
    several partial solutions to realise a new
    innovative approach

10
THEMATIC NETWORKS - 1
Main features of Thematic Networks
  • The goal is to bring together relevant
    stakeholders, expertise and facilities to explore
    new ways of implementing ICT based solutions.
  • The network may initiate working groups,
    workshops and exchanges of good practices with
    the aim of creating the necessary conditions and
    consensus on action plans, standards and
    specifications in view to ensure the widest
    future replication and co-deployment of
    innovative solutions.

11
THEMATIC NETWORKS - 2
Duration and funding
  • Duration between 18-36 months.
  • EC contribution is 300-500 K/network funded
    through lump sums according to the following
    scheme
  • Or through Actual costs when specifically
    required in WP (see dedicated objective in chp3)

12
BEST PRACTICE NETWORKS
Main features of Best Practice Network (BPN)
  • Only for the digital libraries theme, only for a
    transition period up to 2011.
  • Promote the adoption of respective standards and
    specifications by combining the "consensus
    building and awareness raising" function of a
    network with large-scale implementation on a
    sufficient mass of content.
  • The commission can organise Clustering meetings"
    in order to achieve broad consensus and create
    the conditions for the widest possible uptake of
    the recommendations of the BPNs.

13
Funding mechanisms
  • Pilot Type A and B
  • 50 funding of
  • Direct cost actual as recorded in accounts
  • Indirect cost flat rate of 30 of personnel
    cost
  • Best practice Networks
  • 80 of direct cost
  • No funding of indirect cost
  • Thematic Networks
  • Use of lump sums
  • or actual cost if specifically required in the WP
    (chapter3)

14
Evaluation criteria
15
Information for proposers
2010
Other relevant information Info day on ICT PSP
WP 2010- 14 January 2010 in Brussels
Presentation available on http//ec.europa.eu/info
rmation_society/activities/ict_psp/index_en.htm
1st CIP ICT-PSP Coordinators' Day
http//ec.europa.eu/information_society/activitie
s/ict_psp/coordinators/index_en.htm
16
Electronic Submission
  • EPSS - Electronic Proposal Submission System
  • Online preparation only
  • Improved validation checks before submission is
    accepted
  • Submission failure rate 1
  • Main reason waiting till the last minute
  • Technical problems
  • Panic-induced errors
  • Too late starting upload, run out of time
  • Submit early, submit often!
  • If in trouble, call the helpdesk !

17
Link di riferimento
Sito ICT Fp7 http//cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/
Sito CIP ICT Policy Support http//ec.europa.eu/i
nformation_society/activities/ict_psp/index_en.htm
Sito CORDIS http//cordis.europa.eu/en/home.html

Sito CORDIS/Bandi http//cordis.europa.eu/fp7/dc/
index.cfm
Sito CORDIS/NCP http//cordis.europa.eu/fp7/get-su
pport_en.html
18
(No Transcript)
19
ICT VII PQ Funding schemes
  • 3 funding schemes 5 instruments
  • Collaborative Projects (CP)
  • Small or medium scale focused research actions
    (STREP)
  • Large Scale Integrating Projects (IP)
  • Networks of Excellence (NoE)
  • Coordination and Support Actions (CSA)
  • Coordinating or networking actions (CA)
  • Support Actions (SA)

20
Minimum consortia
  • Three independent legal entities from three
    different EU Member States or Associated
    countries
  • EEIGs composed of members that meet the criteria
    above
  • Participation of international (intergovernmental)
    organisations
  • Participants from third countries if in addition
    to minima
  • Support actions no restrictions

21
Activities in FP7 ICT
IP, STREP, NoE
  • Research and technological development
    activities 50 funding of eligible costs
    except for
  • Public bodies (non-profit) 75
  • Secondary and higher education establishments
    75
  • Research organisations (non-profit) 75
  • Small and Medium sized Enterprises - SMEs 75
  • Demonstration activities- All 50 of eligible
    costs
  • Other activities- All 100 including e.g.
    consortium management
  • Direct costs CA, SA
  • Coordination and support actions 100

22
CP - Integrating Projects
  • Experience from the past
  • Purpose Ambitious objective driven research with
    a programme approach
  • Target audience Industry (incl. SMEs), research
    institutions. Universities and in some cases
    potential end-users
  • Typical duration 36-60 months
  • Optimum consortium 10-20 participants
  • Total EU contribution 4-25m (average around
    10m)
  • Flexibility in implementation
  • Update of workplan
  • Possibility for competitive calls for enlargement
    of consortium

23
CP Focused projects
  • Experience from the past
  • Purpose Objective driven research more limited
    in scope than an IP
  • Target audience Industry incl. SMEs, research
    institutes, universities
  • Typical duration 18-36 months
  • Optimum consortium 6-15 participants
  • Total EU contribution 0.8 - 3 m (average
    around 1.9m)
  • Fixed workplan and fixed partnership for duration

24
Networks of excellence
  • Experience from the past
  • Purpose Durable integration of participants
    research activities
  • Target audience research institutions,
    universities, mainly indirectly industry
    trough governing boards etc
  • Typical duration 48-60 months (but
    indefinite integration!)
  • Optimum consortium 6-12 participants
  • Total EU contribution 4-15m (average around
    7m)
  • Flexibility in implementation
  • Update of workplan
  • Possibility to add participants through
    competitive calls

25
Coordination or Networking actions
  • Experience from the past
  • Purpose Co-ordination of research activities
  • Target Audience Research institutions,
    universities, industry incl. SMEs
  • Typical duration 18-36 months
  • Optimum consortium 13-26 participants
  • Total EU contribution 0.5-1.8m (average around
    1m)
  • Fixed overall workplan and partnership for the
    duration

26
Support actions
  • Experience of SSAs in FP6
  • Purpose Support to programme implementation,
    preparation of future actions, dissemination of
    results
  • Target audience Research organisations,
    universities, industry incl. SMEs
  • Typical duration 9-30 months
  • Optimum consortium 1-15 participants
  • Total EU contribution 0.03-1m (average around
    0.5m)
  • Fixed overall workplan and partnership for the
    duration

27
Information for proposers
  • Workprogramme
  • Guide for Applicants
  • now including the Guidance notes for evaluators
    and the Background note on the funding scheme
  • Evaluation forms with notes
  • EPSS manual
  • Model grant agreement

http//cordis.europa.eu/fp7/dc/index.cfm?fuseactio
nUserSite.FP7DetailsCallPagecall_id297act_code
ICTID_ACTIVITY3
28
Electronic Submission
  • EPSS - Electronic Proposal Submission System
  • Online preparation only
  • Improved validation checks before submission is
    accepted
  • Submission failure rate 1
  • Main reason waiting till the last minute
  • Technical problems
  • Panic-induced errors
  • Too late starting upload, run out of time
  • Submit early, submit often!
  • If in trouble, call the helpdesk !

29
Alcuni consigli
30
Alcuni consigli
  • SCELTA OBIETTIVO
  • La vostra proposta deve essere creata per
    risolvere problemi Europei identificati nelle
    politiche dellUE
  • Mai dare limpressione di scrivere un progetto
    perché si sta cercando un finanziamento!

31
Alcuni consigli
  • Valore aggiunto Europeo
  • Valore aggiunto Europeo miglioramento a livello
    comunitario
  • Impatto sulle politiche comunitarie rilevanti
    anche su politiche collegate
  • Innovazione miglioramento sullo stato attuale
  • Diventare valutatore
  • https//cordis.europa.eu/emmfp7/index.cfm
  • http//ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities
    /ict_psp/cf/expert/login/index.cfm

32
Ricerca partner nel tema ICT
Miglioramento dei servizi della rete dei Punti di
Contatto Nazionale ICT e Ricerca Partner
33
(No Transcript)
34
Thank you for your attention!
APRE Agency for the Promotion of European
Research via Cavour, 71 00184 -
Romawww.apre.it mercurio_at_apre.it Tel. (39)
06-48939993Fax. (39) 06-48902550
Punti di Contatto per il TEMA ICT Daniela Mercurio Iacopo De Angelis mercurio_at_apre.it deangelis_at_apre.it
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com