The Effectiveness of Sensory Integration Therapy on Neuro-Physiological Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

The Effectiveness of Sensory Integration Therapy on Neuro-Physiological Development

Description:

Neurological Function What we call rational thought is dependent upon neuro ... of combined assessment comprising a sensory integration ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:366
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Christophe581
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Effectiveness of Sensory Integration Therapy on Neuro-Physiological Development


1
British Institute for Learning Development
Increasing Cognitive Development through
Sensory Integration Therapy
  • Slide Show Only
  • No Action Required slides will change every 10
    seconds

-For viewing only -
2
Increasing Cognitive Development through
Sensory Integration Therapy
  • by
  • British Institute for Learning Development
  • Dubai

3
The Task To Raise Learning Ability and
Intelligence
  • Intelligence is the ability to
  • carry out rational thought.
  • Intelligence can be measured by the
  • degree of efficiency of rational thought
  • which can be observed through
  • The speed of deliberation
  • The extent of the deliberation
  • The outcome of the deliberation.

4
Neurological Function
  • What we call rational thought is
  • dependent upon neuro-physiology,
  • or neurological function.
  • While this may be referred to as
  • natural ability, neurological function
  • is the brains ability to think and
  • develops, or increases, from birth.
  • The more we think, the more parts of the brain
    become involved and complex neighbourhood
    networks of
  • neuron axion fibres are built and joined.

5
Diagram of Neurological Development
The number of neurons do not increase in our
brain from birth. Neural fibre networks increase
as our knowledge and ability increases and
communication links are established between
neurons.
Neural fibre network systems can be trained to
develop.
Neural Networks in Infants at three months old
Neural Networks in Toddlers at two years old
6
Concept of the Learning Brain
  • Learning is implicitly a neurological function
    and the capacity to learn is dependent upon
    neurological efficiency.

  • Unless there is a problem!

7
Jean Ayres Sensory Integration Paradigm
  • Jean Ayres, an American occupational therapist,
    discovered a new paradigm for explaining a
    variety of neurological disorders in children.
  • We refer to this paradigm as sensory integration
    theory and seek to use sensory integration
    therapy to stimulate the sensory system and
    thereby increase neurological function.

8
Sensory Integration
  • Sensory Integration theory proposes that because
    there is plasticity within the central nervous
    system (the brain is moldable) and because the
    brain consists of systems that are hierarchically
    organized, it is possible to stimulate and
    improve neuro-physiological processing and
    integration and thereby increase learning
    capacity.

9
Learning Difficulty
  • As the brain processes and integrates information
    through its sensors, it is able to plan and
    organize behaviour in order to make an adaptive
    response in the ongoing process of learning.
  • However, if the sensory system is not functioning
    as it should, or where sensory information is not
    appropriately integrated, there is said to be a
    learning disorder.

10
Where learning difficulties are not addressed
children will show problems in
  • Developmental Progress - falling behind in
    skills and capacity
  • Motivation - a lack of applied energy
  • Creativity - a lack of initiative and sense of
    adventure
  • Attention - a lack of attentiveness and
    concentration
  • Desire to Learn - a lack of interest in
    schooling
  • Performance - poor results in academics
  • Intellectual Progress - falling behind in
    intellectual application
  • and ability

11
Development Development Delay
and Dysfunction
  • Primary - Physiological Inefficiency
  • - Neurological Inefficiency
  • - Developmental Delay
  • Secondary - Learning is Belated
  • - Academic Difficulties
  • - Perception and
  • Comprehension is Belated
  • - Behaviour Problems
  • Tertiary - Effect on Self Perception
  • - Low Self Esteem
  • - Low Self Worth
  • - Depression, Anxiety and
  • Psychosis
  • - Mental Health Medication

12
British Institute Study
  • The British Institutes two year
  • study from 2006-08, aimed to test the
  • effectiveness of our sensory integration
    programme in improving the neuro-physiological
    development of children with learning
    difficulties.
  • It was proposed that improving the brains
    ability to process and integrate sensory
    information would improve the childrens
    intelligence and learning capability.

13
Diagnosis
  • The specific sensory integration difficulties
    identified ranged across 9 categories of sensory
    integration disorder
  • Bilateral integration and sequencing difficulties
  • Visuodyspraxia
  • Somatodyspraxia
  • Vestibulosomatosensory dysfunction
  • Somatosensory processing disorder
  • Form and space perceptual disorder
  • Visual and vestibular processing deficit
  • Dyspraxia on verbal command
  • Generalized sensory integration disorder.

14
Assessments neuro-physiology
  • Selection was based on the results of combined
    assessment comprising a sensory integration
    evaluation and possibly an educational assessment
    and a speech and language assessment
  • The Sensory Profile by Winnie Dunn
  • Jean Ayres Clinical Observations
  • Sensory Integration Praxis Test SIPT
  • Visual Motor Integration Test VMI
  • Test of Visual Perceptual Skills-Revised TVPS-R
  • Test of Auditory Processing Skills TAPS
  • Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals
    CELF
  • Wechsler Independent Attainment Test -WIAT
    (educational assessment)
  • Wechsler Intelligence Scales WISC IV

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
Average '100' standardised score. No change
expectation throughout development
New standard score prediction for Cohort-C due to
sensory integration coaching
Improvement in neuro-physiology (the brain's
functional ability) due to Sensory Integration
coaching -first year of coaching
Improvement in neuro-physiology (the brain's
functional ability) due to Sensory Integration
coaching - second year of coaching
22
Case Study VMI Scores
Normal development and increase in capability for
average-score children year-on-year
New life-script prediction due to sensory
integration coaching
Improvement in neuro-physiology (the brain's
functional ability) due to Sensory Integration
coaching
Life-script development history of boy before
BILD sensory integration coaching
23
Case Study TVPS Scores
Life-script development history of boy ABOVE
AVERAGE before BILD sensory integration coaching
New life-script prediction due to sensory
integration coaching
Improvement in neuro-physiology (the brain's
functional ability) due to Sensory Integration
coaching
Normal development and increase in capability for
average-score children year-on-year
24
CASE STUDY 1 Male 7 years, 7 months
CASE STUDY 1 Male 9 years, 7 months
SIPT
LEGEND Form Space Perception
Somatosensory
Motor
Other

-4.0 -4.0 -3.0 -3.0 -2.0 -2.0 -1.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0
Neuro-physiological profile of child BEFORE
sensory integration coaching
Neuro-physiological profile of child AFTER
sensory integration coaching
25
CASE STUDY 2 Male 6 years, 10 months
CASE STUDY 2 Male 10 years, 4 months
SIPT
LEGEND Form Space Perception
Somatosensory
Motor
Other

-4.0 -4.0 -3.0 -3.0 -2.0 -2.0 -1.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0
Neuro-physiological profile of child BEFORE
sensory integration coaching
Neuro-physiological profile of child AFTER
sensory integration coaching
26
SIPT
CASE STUDY 3 Male 7 years, 7 months
CASE STUDY 3 Male 8 years, 10 months
Form Space Perception Form Space Perception Form Space Perception Form Space Perception Form Space Perception
Somatosensory Somatosensory Somatosensory Somatosensory Somatosensory
Motor Motor Motor Motor Motor
Other Other Other Other Other


















LEGEND Form Space Perception
Somatosensory
Motor
Other
 
-4.0 -4.0 -3.0 -3.0 -2.0 -2.0 -1.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
Neuro-physiological profile of child AFTER
sensory integration coaching
Neuro-physiological profile of child BEFORE
sensory integration coaching
27
Children with High Scores still improved by
approximately 10 in neuro-physiology ability in
1 year.
Standard Score Comparison
Assessment  Dates
VMI 2006-07
  2007-08
   
TVPS-R 2006-07
  2007-08
Lower Scores Group Lower Scores Group Change Percent
76.6 89.3 12.7 16.5
85.1 93.7 8.6 10.1
       
87 100 13 15
80 92 12 15
Higher Scores Group Higher Scores Group Change Percent
90.8 100.6 9.8 11
98 105.1 7.1 7.2
       
100 109 9 9
111 120 9 8
Lower Scores Group Lower Scores Group Change Percent
76.6 89.3 12.7 16.5
85.1 93.7 8.6 10.1

87 100 13 15
80 92 12 15
Assessment Dates
VMI 2006-07
  2007-08
   
TVPS-R 2006-07
  2007-08
Study shows that children with Lower Scores
improved more than children with Higher Scores.
Lower Score children improved by approximately
15 in 1 year
28
Conclusion
  • By testing the effectiveness of sensory
    integration therapy as a neuro-physiological
    development technique, the results of the study
    show that the sensory integration therapy
    programme was distinctly effective.

29
Implications
  • As a childs neuro-physiology is improved there
    will be
  • An increase in learning ability
  • An increase in literacy
  • An increase in general academic ability
  • An increase in intelligence scores
  • General increase in desire to learn and enjoy
    schooling
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com