Migrant and Host Country Workers: Substitutes or Complements? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Migrant and Host Country Workers: Substitutes or Complements?

Description:

Migrant and Host Country Workers: Substitutes or Complements? Kiriya Kulkolkarn Faculty of Economics, Thammasat University Tanapong Potipiti Faculty of Economics ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: namk8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Migrant and Host Country Workers: Substitutes or Complements?


1
Migrant and Host Country Workers Substitutes or
Complements?
  • Kiriya Kulkolkarn
  • Faculty of Economics, Thammasat University
  • Tanapong Potipiti
  • Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University

2
Map of Migration Flows
Source http//pstalker.com/migration/mg_map.htm
3
How many immigrants are there?
  • World 191 million (6 of labor force in 2005)
  • Luxembourg (62 of labor force in 2001)
  • Switzerland (18 of labor force in 2001)
  • Source United Nations
  • USA
  • 1970 5.3 of labor force
  • 2005 14.7 of labor force
  • 2000-2005 4.1 million new immigrants (1.4-2.7
    million were undocumented )
  • 86 of net increase in employment
  • Source Ottaviano and Peri, 2006, Sum et al.,
    2006
  • Thailand
  • 1987 38,000
  • 1995 700,000
  • 2007 2-2.5 millions (6 of labor force)
  • Source Ministry of Labor, Thailand

4
Debates on Immigration
  • Bad
  • Immigrants steal jobs of local workers.
  • 1.7 million fewer young (16-34) American men were
    employed in 2005 than 5 yrs earlier
  • Immigrants depress native wages.
  • Real annual wages of U.S. natives with less than
    high school education fell by 11.5 during
    1990-2004
  • Fiscal cost, crime, racism
  • Good
  • Immigrants allow the economy to work more
    smoothly by filling vacancies across the jobs
    spectrum, at both the top and the bottom
  • 3D jobs
  • Professionals
  • Sunset industries
  • Immigrants help smooth the peaks and troughs.
    (Ethier, 1985)
  • Immigrants make better use of native workers.

Source Ottaviano and Peri, 2006, Sum et al., 2006
5
Does the statistical evidence support public
concerns?
  • There is surprisingly little evidence to support
    this Most research finds that a 10 percent
    increase in the fraction of immigrants in the
    population reduces the wages of even the least
    skilled native-born workers by at most 1 percent
    Evidence of immigrants reducing employment or
    labor-force participation rates or increasing the
    unemployment rate is even harder to find
    (Friedberg and Hunt,1999, p. 358).

6
Why do Burmese migrate to Thailand?
  • economic motives
  • Income and wage disparities
  • HDI disparities
  • unemployment and forced labor
  • inflation, shortages, rationing
  • political motives (1988, 1990 and beyond)

7
Some rough comparisons
Indicator Burma Thailand Ratio Source
Per cap. inc. (Rupees, 1954-56, COL adj) 300 400 1.33 Myrdal 1967 Table 11-1
Per cap. income 1978 (, official exch rate) 150 490 3.27 World Dev. Report 1980
8
What do migrants typically experience in Thailand?
  • Occupations
  • Dirty, difficult (degrading) and dangerous.
    Fisheries, farming, construction, personal
    services factory work
  • Among registered workers 24 in fisheries 18
    in farming 14 in domestic services others in
    manufacturing, mining, quarrying, construction
  • Unregistered workers in these occptns and also
    market/trade hotels, restaurants, prostitution
  • Wages and conditions job security
  • Wages frequently reported as 2/3 - 3/4 Thai
    equivalents
  • Few rights none for unregistered workers
  • Regulatory and legal environment
  • Thailand introduced permit system 1996
  • Registration and legal status
  • Registration costs (equiv to 1 mo. income)

9
Impact of migrant workers on the Thai economy
  • Opposition to admission of more workers
  • 59 of Thais surveyed by ABAC thought no more
    workers should be admitted 83 believed that
    immigration reduces native wages only 10 were
    in favor of increased migration (Economist, Jan
    18 2007)
  • Migrant workers delay the sunset for
    labor-intensive industries these are still
    important contributors to Thai merchandise
    exports
  • Over time, movement of foreign workers to
    industries w/ fixed locations (agriculture,
    fisheries, construction etc) -- and of
    investments in footloose industries to where
    migrant workers are clustered

10
Impact of migrant workers on Thai wages
  • Sussangkarn (1996) Wages of Thai workers
  • with less than a primary education rise by 3.5
  • with more than a primary education fall
  • Kulkolkarn and Potipiti (2007) no evidence of
    the impact of immigration on Thai wages
  • Bryant and Rukumnuaykit (2007) immigration
    reduces the wages of Thai workers

11
What does the economic theories say?
  • Standard Model
  • Same skill Perfect substitute
  • Immigrants lower native wages
  • Different skill Imperfect substitutes
  • Immigrants may lower or increases native wages
  • Efficiency Wage Model
  • Small numbers of immigrants increases native
    wages
  • Large numbers of immigrants decreases native wages

12
Stylized Facts
  • 1. Immigrants have lower education.
  • 2. Natives are more versatile.
  • 3. Immigrants release native workers to do higher
    wage jobs.
  • The existing models has not yet captured all
    these facts in one model.
  • In our model, natives possess 1 unit of type-1
    skill and 1 unit of type-2 skill. Migrants own 1
    unit type-2 skill but ? (lt 1) unit of type-1
    skill.

13
My model
  • Production function of the output of the economy
  • Full employment
  • Production function of the intermediate goods h
    and b

14
3 possible outcomes
  • 1. Migrants work in sector h. Natives work in
    sectors h and b.
  • Wages are equal in both sectors.
  • Some natives move to sector b after immigration.
  • Immigration decreases the wage of natives.

15
3 possible outcomes
  • 2. Migrants work in sector h. Natives work in
    sector b.
  • Natives and migrants receive different wages.
  • Immigration can increase the wages of natives
    above the pre-immigration level.
  • Additional migrants decreases their own wages.

16
3 possible outcomes
  • 3. Migrants work in sectors h and b. Natives work
    in sector b.
  • Natives and migrants receive different wages.
  • Additional migrants decreases native wage and
    their own wages.

17
Migrant and Host-Country Workers Substitutes or
Complements
  • 3 stages as of immigrants increases
  • 1. Migrants enter into one labor submarket while
    natives work in both submarkets
  • 2. Migrants work in one labor submarket while
    natives work in another.
  • 3. Migrants work in both submarkets while
    natives work in one submarket.
  • The results depends also on
  • Skill similarity
  • Production technology

18
(No Transcript)
19
Impacts of Immigration
  • Native wage can be higher
  • Native wage cannot be higher

Stage 1
Stage 3
Stage 2
m
20
Implications
  • The relationship between immigrants and wage is
    not monotonic.
  • Not a bell curve but an S curve
  • of immigrants, skill similarity, production
    technology
  • Policy that helps native workers
  • Number of immigrants must be large enough
  • Allow immigrants who are very different from
    natives
  • Limit immigrants to work only in some sectors
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com