Focusing on Student Learning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Loading...

PPT – Focusing on Student Learning PowerPoint presentation | free to download - id: 4e3f88-OTUzM



Loading


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation
Title:

Focusing on Student Learning

Description:

on Student Learning Developing Assessment Systems for Student and Program Development May 24, 2006 Forsyth Tech Community College ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 66
Provided by: radfo84
Learn more at: http://www.cpcc.edu
Category:

less

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Focusing on Student Learning


1
Focusingon Student Learning
  • Developing Assessment Systems
  • for
  • Student and Program Development
  • May 24, 2006
  • Forsyth Tech Community College

2
Agenda
  • Why are we doing this?
  • Translating instructors intentions into ?
    student learning outcomes
  • Developing
  • Instructional objectives
  • Assessment tasks
  • Evaluation tools

3
Task 1 Pre-Assessment
  • Please complete the survey, marking the left hand
    column (how much you know prior to the workshop)

4
Why did Lucy get a C?
  • Write down at least one question that comes to
    mind when you read the cartoon.
  • What is Lucy questioning?
  • How could the teacher avoid questions regarding
    his/her basis for grading?

5
Task 2 Why did Lucy get a C?
6
Why did Lucy get a C?
  • Write down at least one question that comes to
    mind when you read the cartoon.
  • What is Lucy questioning?
  • How could the teacher avoid questions regarding
    his/her basis for grading?

7
What are some questions?
  • How do we clearly communicate performance
    expectations to students?
  • What is fair or equitable? Do we give some
    students a break because their parents get
    faulty clothes hangers?
  • Do we reward effort? If so, how do we define it?
  • Do we advantage or disadvantage certain students
    by how we measure performance/achievement?
  • If students dont perform well on assessments,
    does that mean we did not teach well? How do we
    know whether or not we did? Do faculty
    evaluations provide a better picture of how well
    we teach?
  • Is it important to have students create coat
    hanger sculptures? Or to perform well on any of
    our assessments?
  • Important to whom? Why?
  • What kinds of student outcomes do we value
    personally as teachers and collectively as a
    faculty?

8
Focusing on Student Learning
  • Institutional assessment should not be concerned
    about
  • valuing what can be measured,
  • but, instead, about measuring that which is
    valued.
  • -- Banta, T.W.
    et. al.

9
Goals for today
  • Participants will be able to
  • Explain how student assessment can enhance
    student engagement/ learning and promote program
    development
  • Begin or continue the process to
  • a) Articulate goals for student learning
  • b) Translate goals into instructional
    objectives stated terms of student
  • learning outcomes
  • c ) Identify or develop assessment tasks
  • d) Select or develop evaluation tools.
  • Describe the changing context of assessment,
    accreditation, and accountability in higher
    education.

10
Starting with what we do well
  • Being accountable
  • Institutional Effectiveness

11
  • Community colleges are prominent among the
    leaders in higher education in establishing
    indicators of institutional effectiveness,
    gathering benchmark data, and using findings to
    improve the satisfaction of students and other
    community constituents. Trudy Banta, Editors
    Notes, 1995

12
Assessment, planning, and budget are integrated.
Objectives established by departments during
program review become the basis for budget
allocations.
13
North Carolina Community College Performance
Measures
  • Progress of Basic Skills Students
  • Passing Rates on Licensure/Certification Exams
  • Goal Completion for Completers
  • Employment Rate of Graduates
  • Performance of College Transfer Students
  • Passing Rates in Developmental Courses
  • Success rate of developmental students in
    subsequent college level courses
  • Student satisfaction
  • Retention, graduation rates
  • Employer satisfaction
  • Business/Industry satisfaction with services
    provided
  • Program enrollment

14
Forsyth Techs Record
  • Basic skills students meet state benchmarks (82
    compared to system average of 79)
  • Aggregate passing rates on licensure/certification
    exams is equal to NC 86 pass rate
  • Employment rate is reported at 99.05
  • 90 (state 80) students pass developmental
    courses
  • Satisfaction of completers 93 (state 97)
  • Business/industry satisfaction with services 100
    (100)

15
Back to Trudy Banta
  • Peterson (1999)
  • 2,524 non-proprietary postsecondary institutions
    AS/BS
  • 1,393 (55) responded

Compared to all institutions, associate of arts
institutions are less likely to collect cognitive
and affective data, less likely to use
student-centered methods in collecting data, and
less likely to conduct studies of student
performance
16
How would this change what we do?
  • Outcomes-based (MBO) assessment
  • Outcomes (objectives on the tactical plans),
  • developed by all instructional departments and
    administrative and educational support service
    departments,
  • are statements describing what each departments
    staff/faculty members desire to be the results of
    their efforts.
  • Annual FTCC Plan, 2004-2005
  • Assessing Student Learning Outcomes
  • Directly examining
  • the knowledge, skills, and abilities
  • that a student has attained
  • at key points in his or her progress
  • through a set of higher education experiences and
  • in the first years of practice.

17
Creating Assessment Systems--Shared Commitments
  • Faculty share a commitment to
  • A set of student learning outcomes
  • Common assessments within programs
  • across course sections
  • Collecting, compiling, analyzing, reporting, and
    using the results of assessments of student
    learning
  • To improve candidate performance
  • To improve programs
  • To improve policies and procedures.

18
What am I going to get out of this?
  • Shared expectations of student performance
  • Clear communication of expectations
  • Enhanced student performance
  • Ability of students, faculty, programs/departments
    to self-advocate
  • A system of program evaluation which includes
    evaluation of student learning outcomes.

19
Why?
  • What are some of the potential benefits of
    establishing student assessment systems?

20
Why assess student learning?
  • Enhances Student Engagement
  • Continuous improvement of Curriculum,
    Instruction, and Student Performance
  • Promotes Professional Community (inquiry,
    reflection, scholarship of practice)
  • Enables students, faculty, programs, and
    institutions to Self-Advocate
  • -- able to participate in data-based
    decision-making
  • Better reflects the complexity, extent, and
    impact of Faculty Work
  • Helps us achieve our Institutional Mission
  • Develops Public Trust

21
Student Engagement
  • Embedded assessment student has to be actively
    engaged (cannot be passive learner)
  • Clear expectations, models of performance
  • Self-evaluation
  • Assessing knowledge, skills, dispositions
    required for practice (meaningful)
  • Can use products of assessments in job search,
    etc.

22
Improve Curriculum, Instruction, Student
Performance
  • JMU major dividend of ongoing assessment has
    been greater faculty involvement. This process
    ensures that curriculum decisions remain in the
    hands of those who deliver the curriculum.
  • curriculum assessment curriculumreal-time,
    on-going examination and improvement of teaching
    and curriculum
  • Provides a focus for instruction.
  • Clarifies expectations of students.
  • Ensures we provide appropriate opportunities for
    reaching expectations.
  • Clearly communicates target, average, below
    average, unsatisfactory performance
  • Avoids overlap or oversight ensures
    comprehensiveness of curriculum
  • Grounds curriculum in practice

23
Inquiry, Growth, and Professional Community
  • Dialog values, commitments, what matters most,
    common expectations, level of performance,
    opportunities for learning
  • Become a learning organization
  • Cross-disciplinary connections
  • Leadership opportunities among faculty
  • Establish connections with practitioners
  • Highlight successes of students, programs,
    faculty

24
Self-Advocacy
  • Students have concrete evidence of what they know
    and can do
  • Faculty are able to document their impact on
    students
  • Contributes to the scholarship of practice
  • Programs, divisions, institutions have array of
    information

25
Provides a Fuller Picture of Faculty Work
  • Outcomes such as graduation/retention rates dont
    always capture the impact of faculty efforts
  • Helps us tell our story
  • efforts in providing learning opportunities
  • the complex and multidimensional nature of
    learning
  • Helps make students more accountable for their
    part in the learning process

26
Enhance Public Trust
  • General public, potential students and families,
    politicians
  • Federal, state, public push for accountability
  • The role of anecdotes
  • Quality assurance accreditation

27
Accomplish Institutional Mission
  • Mission  
  • Graduates of Forsyth Tech are
  • technically skilled,
  • regionally and globally oriented,
  • prepared for lifelong learning and full civic
    engagement and employment.

28
Assessment and Accountability
  • Professional standards boards have moved from
    input measures
  • ? to management by objectives
  • to documentation of student
  • outcomes
  • and have moved from
  • examining institutions
  • ? to examining programs.

29
Assessment and Accountability
  • Council for Higher Education Accreditation CHEA
  • American Association of Community Colleges
  • Commission on the Accreditation of Allied Health
    Education Programs
  • Joint Review Committee on Educational Programs in
    Diagnostic Medical Sonography
  • Joint Review Committee on Educational Programs in
    Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic
    Technology
  • North Carolina Board of Nursing
  • Technology Accreditation Commission of the
    Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology
  • Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health
    Education Programs

30
Council for Higher Education Accreditation
  • Accrediting organizations are responsible for
    establishing clear expectations that institutions
    and programs will routinely
  • define,
  • collect,
  • interpret, and
  • use evidence of student learning outcomes.

31
Council for Higher Education Accreditation
  • More specifically
  • regularly gather and report concrete evidence
    about what students know and can do as a result
    of their respective courses of study,
  • framed in terms of established learning outcomes
    and
  • supplied at an appropriate level of aggregation.
  • Supplement this with information about other
    dimensions of effective institutional or program
    performance
  • Prominently feature relevant evidence of student
    learning outcomes.
  • Statement of Mutual Responsibilities for Student
    Learning Outcomes Accreditation, Institutions,
    and Programs (September, 2003)

32
SACS
  • 3.4.1 The institution demonstrates that each
    educational program for which academic credit is
    awarded (a) is approved by the faculty and the
    administration, and (b) establishes and evaluates
    program and learning outcomes.
  • 3.5.1 The institution identifies college-level
    competencies within the general education core
    and provides evidence that graduates have
    attained those competencies.

33
Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health
Education Programs
  • Evaluations of students must be conducted on a
    recurrent basis and with sufficient frequency to
    provide both the students and program faculty
    with valid and timely indications of the
    students progress toward and achievement of the
    competencies and learning domains stated in the
    curriculum.

34
ABET Technology Accreditation Commission
  • Each engineering technology program must have in
    place published educational objectives consistent
    with mission and with ABET criteria
  • Must utilize multiple assessment measures in a
    process that provides documented results to
    demonstrate that the program objectives and
    outcomes are being met..
  • examples include student portfolios, student
    performance in project work and activity-based
    learning national exams employer and graduate
    surveys..

35
Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic
Technology
  • A programs goals are a more specific expression
    of the programs intended student learning
    outcomes. The goals should be written using
    behavioral terms and should address the
    cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains.
    They must be measurable, preferably through the
    use of more than one measurement tool.
  • -- JRCERT Guide for Program Analysis (05/05)

36
Summarizing
  • Identify, communicate, and assess clear,
    measurable student learning outcomes
  • Behavioral statements cognitive, affective,
    psychomotor learning domains
  • Based on institutional, departmental/program,
    state, and national standards
  • Establish a system for directly assessing student
    achievement of objectives
  • Multiple assessments across time
  • including graduate and employer surveys
  • Collect, compile, report, and use results to
    improve student performance, programs, and
    organization

37
Identifying Student Outcomes
  • Translating program goals and instructors
    intentions into instructional objectives
  • stated in terms of student learning outcomes.

38
Communicating goals and objectives
  • Beginning with some examples and
  • the importance of verbs

39
Clear, Observable Behavior (cant measure what
you cant see)
40
Behavioralcognitive, affective,
psychomotorUsing a Framework to guide us
  • Benjamin Blooms
  • Taxonomy of Learning Domains
  • Cognitive mental skills (Knowledge)
  • Affective growth in feelings or emotional area
    (Attitudes)
  • Psychomotor manual or physical skills (Skills)

41
Writing Instructional Objectives
There are a number of approaches to writing
instructional objectives
  • Mager -- Behavioral objectives
  • Eisner -- Expressive objectives

Gronlund -- General/specific objectives
42
Writing Instructional Objectives
Mager proposes writing specific statements about
observable outcomes that can be built up to
become a curriculum (an inductive approach).
  • An example of a behavioral objective

Given 3 minutes of class time, the student will
solve 9 out of 10 multiplication problems of the
type 5 X 4 _____.
43
Writing Behavioral Objectives
Three Parts of a Behavioral Objective
In an oral presentation,
the student will paraphrase Dr. Martin Luther
Kings's I Have a Dream address,
mentioning at least 3 of the 5 major points
discussed in class.
44
Writing Instructional Objectives
Eisner proposes that not all instructional
objectives should focus on outcome some should
focus on the learning process itself (expressive
objectives).
  • Examples of expressive objectives
  • Students will attend a live symphony
  • performance.

b. Students will use multiplication in
everyday activities.
45
Writing Instructional Objectives
Gronlund proposes starting with a general
statement and providing specific examples of
topics to be covered or behaviors to be observed
(a deductive approach).
46
Stating Instructional ObjectivesCurricular
Questions
  • Create a basic document in a spreadsheet.
  • Enter text and values into an application.
  • Write formulas to calculate simple and
    multi-segment problems
  • Format cells to display data appropriately
  • Embed charts into the spreadsheet
  • Display the sheet in worksheet and formula views
  • Print document in both views and in landscape or
    portrait format.

47
Writing Instructional Objectives
Examples of general/specific objectives
  • Students will detect the use of stereotypes.
  • identify situations in which stereotypes might
    emerge
  • recall or identify indicators or clues of
    stereotyping
  • use of overgeneralization, exaggeration
  • linking features together that are not
    logically linked (blonds are dumb)
  • use of vague words (shifty)
  • use of extremes or absolutes (never, none, all)
  • absence of individual attributes or variations
  • locate other information and examples which
    counter stated characteristics
  • determine if communication includes indicators
    of stereotyping

48
Writing Instructional Objectives
Examples of general/specific objectives
(affective)
  • Displays a scientific attitude
  • demonstrates curiosity in identifying problems
  • seeks natural causes of events
  • demonstrates open-mindedness when seeking
    answers
  • suspends judgment until obtains all possible
    evidence
  • respects evidence from credible sources
  • shows objectivity in analyzing evidence and
    drawing conclusions
  • seeks ways to verify results
  • shows willingness to revise conclusions as new
    evidence becomes available

49
Writing Instructional Objectives
  • Examples of General Objectives
  • Write an essay.
  • Apply systematic strategies to monitor and
    improve personal health.
  • Set up and operate graphics design equipment.
  • Apply principles of radiation safety and
    protection.
  • Process appointments in a timely and accurate
    manner.
  • Develop a basic database using a database
    application.
  • Other examples?

50
Task 3 Trying our hand.
  • Translating goals and intentions into
    instructional objectives stated in terms of
    student learning outcomes

51
Stating Instructional Objectives
  • Principles of electricity.
  • Comprehends principles of electricity.
  • Topic vs. student learning outcome.

52
Stating Instructional Objectives
  • Comprehends assigned reading material.
  • To increase students reading ability.
  • Describe students learning behavior rather than
    teachers teaching behavior.

53
Stating Instructional Objectives
  • Gains knowledge of basic principles of radiation
    safety and protection.
  • Applies basic principles of radiation safety and
    protection in new situations.
  • 1 the learning process rather than the
    learning outcome (knows, develops skills in,
    acquires, understands, learns). Another pitfall
    includes describing the learning activity
    create a diorama read seven journal articles,
    etc.

54
Stating Instructional Objectives
  • Explains the scientific method and applies it
    effectively.
  • Explains and applies---avoid more than one
    verb. Students may be able to do one but not the
    other, so is the objective met?

55
Guided Practice Breaking verbs down into
specific learning objectives
  • Students will evaluate an Articles of
    Incorporation, a patient care plan, nuclear
    medicine image, essay.
  • Determine the purpose for analyzing
  • Identify the criteria to use
  • Identify idealized standards for each criterion
  • Examine the information and identify evidence
    related to criteria
  • Judge the degree of match of the evidence with
    idealized standards
  • State results of analysis by summarizing patterns
    and giving examples of meeting/not meeting
    standards within the criteria.

56
Stating Specific Instructional Objectives Guided
Practice
  • Generic objectives can often guide the
    development of content-specific objectives.
  • Students will demonstrate their knowledge of
    legal principles regarding the formation and
    maintenance of corporations or partnerships.
  • Comprehend basic principles
  • States principle in own words
  • Identifies examples of the principles
  • Distinguishes between correct and incorrect
    applications of the principle
  • Predicts an outcome based on the principle.

  • -- Gronlund, 2004, p. 19

57
Stating Instructional ObjectivesCurricular
Questions
  • The nuclear medicine technologist provides
    patient care.
  • Acquires adequate knowledge of the patients
    medical history
  • Provides for proper comfort and care before,
    during, and after procedures
  • Recognizes surgical and disease factors that may
    create artifacts or variants on images
  • Identifies when data acquisition or data
    processing protocol must be modified
  • Provides safe and sanitary conditions
  • Establishes and maintains good communication with
    each patient.
  • IF THESE WERE OVERALL PROGRAM GOALS, how can we
    describe expectations for students when they are
    beginning their program and starting to learn
    about patient care?
  • KNOWS BASIC TERMS ? COMPREHENDS CONCEPTS AND
    PRINCIPLES? APPLIES PRINCIPLES?INTERPRETS,
    EVALUATES

58
Task 3 Stating General and Specific
Instructional Objectives
  1. In groups of 2-3, select or state a general
    instructional objective.
  2. Identify specific learning objectives for the
    general learning objective.

59
Evaluation Tools
  • Checklists
  • __ 1. Sands and prepares surface properly.
    (check, /-)
  • Numerical rating scales
  • 4 3 2 1 a) Uses tools
    correctly for each task.
  • Numerical rating scales with descriptors
  • Selects appropriate equipment.
  • __Needs to be ___________________ Needs some help
    _____________selects proper
  • told what to use
    in selecting
    equipment independently
  • 1
    2 3
    4 5
  • Rating scales
  • 3 always, 2 sometimes, 1 never
  • a) Pays attention when problems are explained.

60
Rubrics Indicators of Quality
Criteria Performance Level 1 Performance Level 2 Performance Level 3 Performance Level 4
Thesis Unclear or unidentifiable topic Possibly vague and/or overly simplistic topic needs considerable revision. Clearly stated, potentially strong topic with some revisions. Clearly stated, strong topic original insightful.
Structure Unclear, often because these is weak or non-existent. Transitions confusing or unclear. Few topic sentences. Generally unclear wanders or jumps from point to point generally lacks transitions some paragraphs without clear topics. Generally clear and logical may lack a few clear transitions or some paragraphs may not be clear and solid. Ideas flow logically. Excellent transitions from point to point. Paragraphs support sold topic sentences.
Use of Evidence Very few or very weak examples or explanations. General failure to support statements or evidence not relevant quotes poorly integrated. Examples and explanations support some points points often lack evidence quotes may be poorly integrated. Examples and explanations support most points some evidence does not support point or may appear not relevant. Relevant materials support several points reasons supported with good explanations and examples excellent integration of quoted material.
Analysis Lack of evidence or very few or very weak examples weak attempts to relate to argument. Evidence is often merely stated and not explained or connected to the argument. Evidence often related to argument or reasons though not always clearly or completely explained. Clearly relates evidence to reasons poses new ways to think of thesis.
Logic and argumentation Simplistic view of topic no effort to grasp alternative views might contain logical fallacies. Logic might fail at time argument might be unclear might not address opposing views or states them but does not address them. Acknowledges opposing views and addresses several aspects of them, but not always in complete manner. Anticipates and defuses counter-arguments. All ideas flow logically. Makes novel connections which illuminate thesis.
61
Student Assessment PlansIdentify program level
student learning outcomes.Identify decision
points as students progress and the assessments
used to make decisions.
General Program-Level Student Learning Outcomes Phase I Phase 2 Follow Up
Content knowledge Assessment such as comprehensive exams in courses. Assessment such as licensure exam. Employer survey Alumni survey
Professional skills Assessment such as class demonstrations, simulations, or projects. Assessment such as more involved clinical experiences. Employer survey Alumni survey
62
Student Assessment Plans
  • Individual Student Inventory
  • Identify program-level student learning outcomes
  • Instructors document which outcomes students
    demonstrate within courses/clinical experiences.

63
Summary
  • Objectives student learning outcomes
  • Objectives
  • focus instruction,
  • guide learning,
  • provide criteria/standards for assessment,
  • convey instructional intent to others,
  • enable us to evaluate instruction.
  • Frameworks (Blooms Taxonomy) comprehensiveness
  • Verbs are the operative words!
  • Pitfalls topic, teacher behavior, learning
    process/activity
  • Evaluation tools convey expectations for student
    performance (various levels of specificity)
  • Programs develop plans for documenting student
    performance

64
NEXT STEPS Task 4 Teaching Goals Inventory
  • Help college teachers become more aware of what
    they want to accomplish in individual courses and
    across programs.
  • http//www.uiowa.edu/centeach/tgi/background.htm

65
NEXT STEPS
  • Review, update, or develop course-based
    assessment
  • Identify general instructional objectives
  • Identify specific instructional objectives
  • Identify assessment tasks
  • Develop evaluation tools
  • Review, update, or develop program-level student
    assessment plan
  • Identify program- or departmental student
    learning outcomes
  • Identify a systematic process for assessing
    outcomes and for collecting, compiling,
    analyzing, reporting, and using the assessment
    data.
About PowerShow.com