Title: Financial Bubbles: What They Are and What Should Be Done CEPR Basic Economics Seminar Dean Baker November 10, 2005
1Financial Bubbles What They Are and What Should
Be DoneCEPR Basic Economics Seminar Dean
BakerNovember 10, 2005
2Financial Bubbles What They Are and What Should
Be Done
- The Nineties Stock Bubble The Secrets of Simple
Arithmetic - The Housing Bubble You can always live in an
overpriced house - Bubbles Arent Cute How bubbles harm the
economy - How the Fed Can Burst Bubbles
- Holding the Experts Accountable
3The Simple Arithmetic of the Stock Bubble
- Short-term (1 day to 5 year) stock returns are
unpredictable, largely random - Long-term stock returns can be predicted based on
profit growth and PE ratios - Forecasters (CBO, OMB, private forecasters)
routinely make profit growth projections,
therefore it is very simple to derive stock
return projections - Stock returns have two components capital gains
(the rise in share price) and dividend payouts
(including share buybacks) - Stock returns capital gains dividend payouts
DEFINITIONAL TRUTH
4Projecting Stock Returns
- Assume PE is constant through time then capital
gains equal the rate of growth in profit - Dividend payouts average 60 of profits limited
by the need for reinvestment - Dividend yields 60 of earnings yield (inverse
of PE ratio) - Therefore, stock returns profit growth 60 of
earnings yield
5Stock Returns Normal and Bubble Years
- Normal
- Profit growth 3.0 a year, capital gains 3.0 a
year - Historic PE 14.5 to 1, implied earnings yield 7.0
percent - Dividend yield 60 of 7.0 4.2
- Stock return 3.0 capital gains 4.2 dividend
yield 7.2
6Stock Returns Normal and Bubble Years
- Normal (7.2)
- Nineties Bubble Years
- PE crossed 20 in 1996 and 30 in 1999, so earnings
yield was under 5 after 1996 and close to 3.0
in 1999 - The dividend yield fell from 3.0 in 1996 (60 of
5) to less than 2 in 1999 - Normal profit growth was 3.0 but 1996-2000 were
near cyclical peaks. CBO projected NEGATIVE real
profit growth from 1999 to 2019 - In bubble years, projected stock returns would
have been 2.0-3.0 percent from dividends, plus
minimal capital gains, depending on growth
assumptions - Investors would receive much better returns from
government bonds
7Projections If the Price to Earnings Ratio Isnt
Constant
If the PE ratio rises, then dividend yield falls,
leading to ever higher PE
- If the PE falls, then capital gains are negative
and returns are far worse than if PE stays
constant - A high PE guarantees low returns unless profit
growth goes through the roof
8How to Recognize a Housing Bubble
- In the long run, house prices nationally have
followed inflation - In the long run, house prices have risen more or
less with rents (same market)
- Unless some fundamental factor has changed, then
the run-up since 1997 is a bubble
9The Realtors Fundamentals
- Population growth its slower today than in
prior decades - Rising incomes incomes grew far more rapidly in
the 50s and 60s - Environmental restrictions on building the late
90s were not the heyday of environmentalism
(Republican takeover of Congress and state
houses) - Limited supply of land land has always been
limited what happened to Internet removing
restrictions of time and space? - Low interest rates if low interest rates
explain the run-up, then house prices will
plummet when interest rates return to normal - It is interesting to note that the fundamentals
just started to drive up house prices at the same
time the stock bubble was pushing up stock
prices. (Stock wealth can lead to higher real
estate prices, just as in Japan
in the 80s)
10Bubbles National and Local
- Housing markets are local, but there are common
factors - The collapse of the bubble will not hit every
market equally (the collapse of the stock bubble
didnt hit every stock equally) but virtually all
markets are likely to see price declines - Higher interest rates will likely lead to a
collapse, but overbuilding will eventually
saturate the market, even without an increase in
interest rates
11Bubbles and the Economy
12How the Stock Bubble Harmed the Economy
- Misdirected investment companies with no real
future get billions to invest - Inflated stock prices conceal accounting fraud
(e.g., WorldCom, Enron, Global Crossing) - Consumer wealth effect people spend based on
stock wealth that is not there they dont have
retirement savings when needed - Under-funded pension funds (e.g., Delphi, United,
Northwestern, etc.) as pension fund managers had
assumed bubble would last - Collapse leads to a demand gap (a.k.a. recession)
that is difficult to counteract
13How the Housing Bubble Harms the Economy
- Overbuilding in housing due to bubble inflated
prices, resources that could have been better
invested elsewhere are spent constructing big
homes - Consumer wealth effect people spend based on
housing wealth that is not there they do not
have retirement savings when needed - Possible financial panic when bubble bursts,
secondary mortgage market (Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac) could be in danger - Collapse leads to a demand gap (a.k.a. recession)
that is difficult to counteract.
14How the Fed Can Burst Bubbles
- It is the Feds job Greenspan intervened to
stem the stock crash in 1987. He intervened in
the unraveling of the Long-Term Capital Hedge
Fund in 1998. The stock and housing bubbles have
gar more impact on the economy than either of
these events - The Fed has regulatory tools margin
requirements on stocks, lending soundness on
housing. - Interest rates higher interest rates can burst
bubbles.
15Fed Talk (or Treasury Talk)The Best Weapon
Against Financial Bubbles
- The Fed chair and the Treasury Secretary have
enormous audiences for their pronouncements - If either of them clearly laid out the rationale
for a stock or housing bubble (e.g., showed my
charts) then every investment manager and
financial advisor in the country would have to be
familiar with the argument. - Any investment manager or financial advisor who
simply ignored these arguments would risk being
fired and possibly sued for negligence. - Talk is cheap why not do it?
16Holding the Experts Accountable
- It was possible (in fact easy) for any
professional analyst to recognize the stock
bubble - It is possible (in fact easy) for any
professional to recognize the housing bubble. - Custodians get fired when they dont do their
job why dont economists, financial analysts,
investment managers, and policy analysts?
(Everyone else was wrong too doesnt cut it.) - The Congressional Budget Office and Social
Security Administration have consistently made
stock return projections for Social Security
privatization that they cannot support. - CBO over-estimated projected revenues in 2000 by
close to 1 trillion over a ten year time frame
(0.8 of GDP) because it assumed that the stock
bubble would persist indefinitely. (No
one was fired.)
17Conclusions
- It is possible to recognize bubbles financial
markets are not that mysterious - Financial bubbles cause enormous economic damage
far more than modest increases in the inflation
rate - The Fed and Treasury can and should act to
counteract bubbles - Economists, business, and policy professionals
who cannot see financial bubbles should find
another line of work
18Reading List
- Baker, D. and D. Rosnick, 2005. Will a Bursting
Bubble Trouble Bernanke? The Evidence for a
Housing Bubble Washington, D.C. Center for
Economic and Policy Research http//www.cepr.net/
publications/housing_bubble_2005_11.pdf. - Baker, D. 2002. The Run-Up in Home Prices Is It
Real or Is It Another Bubble? Washington, D.C.
Center for Economic and Policy Research
http//www.cepr.net/publications/housing_2002_08.
pdf. - Baker, D. 2000. Double Bubble The Implications
of the Over-Valuation of the Stock Market and the
Dollar, Washington, D.C. Center for Economic
and Policy Research http//www.cepr.net/publicati
ons/double_bubble.pdf. - Kindleburger, C. 2000. Manias, Panics, and
Crashes A History of Financial Crises. New York
John Wiley and Sons. - Shiller, R. 2005. Irrational Exuberance,
Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press.
19Financial Bubbles What They Are and What Should
Be DoneDean Bakerbaker_at_cepr.netCenter for
Economic and Policy Researchwww.cepr.net