Using Benchmarking To Improve Supply Chain Processes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Using Benchmarking To Improve Supply Chain Processes

Description:

Using Benchmarking To Improve Supply Chain Processes Dr. Robert A. Novack Dr. William L. Grenoble Center for Supply Chain Research Penn State University – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:214
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: TeresaL152
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Using Benchmarking To Improve Supply Chain Processes


1
Using Benchmarking To Improve Supply Chain
Processes
  • Dr. Robert A. Novack
  • Dr. William L. Grenoble
  • Center for Supply Chain Research
  • Penn State University

2
  • AGENDA
  • CSCR and Benchmarking
  • Survey Methodology
  • Demographics
  • Benchmarking Practices
  • Satisfaction With Benchmarking
  • Issues and Observations

3
  • Survey Objectives
  • To Learn About How Organizations Practice
    Benchmarking
  • Why Benchmark
  • What is Benchmarked?
  • How used?
  • Satisfaction
  • Challenges
  • To Provide Advice to Supply Chain Council

4
CSCR Focus
Supply Chain
5
Consortium BenchmarkingDeveloping an Approach
  • Group Process GenericFormation
    Study Process
  • Presentation Best Metrics
  • Discussion Practices Survey

Start-Up
On-Going
6
Benchmarking Groups
Customer Service Import S OP Transportation
BASF Becton-Dickinson BASF IBM American Standard Arkema Group Becton-Dickinson Church Dwight
CertainTeed ExxonMobil Chemical Hershey Foods Kodak Pfizer PPG Industries Brown-Forman Campbell Soup Company CertainTeed ExxonMobil Chemical Honeywell Johnson Johnson
Kodak Kraft National Gypsum Unisys Church Dwight ConAgra Foods ExxonMobil Chemical
Ocean Spray Cranberries Pfizer Heinz Hershey Foods
Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceuticals TARP Johnson Johnson Kimberly-Clark
World Kitchen Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Kraft Foods Pfizer
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals
4/15/2014









7
  • Jointly sponsored research
  • Penn States CSCR and the Supply Chain Council
  • Survey sent to 1,221 CLM executives
  • 126 useable responses
  • 10.3 response rate
  • 75 benchmarking firms (59.5)

Methodology
8
Respondent Profile -Business Environment
9
Respondent Profile -Industry
10
Respondent Profile - Revenue
11
Respondent Profile - Supply Chain Council Member?
12
Have You Conducted Benchmarking Activities in the
Past?
13
Reasons Firms Do Not Undertake Supply Chain
Benchmarking
14
What are the reasons why your firm decided to
benchmark SC processes?
15
Which Areas In the Supply Chain Were Benchmarked?
16
Which of the Following SCOR Level One Metrics Is
Your Organization Currently Measuring And/or
Benchmarking?
  • Measuring() Benchmarking ()
  • Delivery performance 88.0 54.7
  • Inventory days of supply 70.7 36.0
  • Order fulfillment lead time 68.0 38.7
  • Fill rate/ Perfect order
  • fulfillment 62.7 37.3
  • Supply chain management
  • costs 58.7 37.3
  • Supply chain response time 52.0 20.0

17
Which of the Following SCOR Level One Metrics Is
Your Organization Currently Measuring And/or
Benchmarking?
  • Measuring() Benchmarking ()
  • Cost of Goods Sold 49.3 14.7
  • Asset Turns 42.7 18.7
  • Cash-to-Cash cycle time 34.7 20.0
  • Warranty cost or returns
  • processing cost 24.0 6.7
  • Value-added productivity 22.7 9.3
  • Production flexibility 16.0 9.3

18
How Do You Use the Results of Benchmarking?
  • 90.7 To encourage improved performance
  • 82.7 To plan improvement in supply chain
  • processes
  • 68.0 To reengineer business processes
  • 66.7 To gain a competitive advantage in the
  • industry

19
Process Measured
Functional Benchmarked Area
  • 72.0 Transportation
  • 62.7 Fulfillment
  • 88.0 Delivery Performance
  • 68.0 Lead Time
  • 62.7 Fill Rate

20
Benchmarking to Achieve Results
Process Measured
  • 58.7 Supply Chain Cost
  • 5.25 Reduced Operating Costs

21
Benchmarking Value
Use of Benchmarking Results
  • 90.7 Improved Performance
  • 82.7 Plan Process Improvement
  • 5.42 Performance Comparisons
  • 5.52 Improved Process

22
How Would You Assess the Satisfaction With Your
Overall Benchmarking Efforts?
23
How Would You Assess the Satisfaction With Your
Overall Benchmarking Efforts?
24
How Satisfied Are You With the Following
Attributes Concerning Your Current Benchmarking
Efforts?
  • Attribute Score
  • Quality of output 4.76
  • Comparability 4.50
  • Timeliness 4.51
  • Price/ Cost 4.53
  • 7 point Likert-type scale 1 not satisfied,
    7 satisfied

25
How Important Have the Following Outputs or
Benefits of Benchmarking Been in Providing Value
to Your Firm?
26
Please Indicate How Important Benchmarking
Initiatives Have Been to Your Firm in Achieving
Improved Results in the Following Areas?
27
The Most Important Challenges to Overcome to Be
Successful in Benchmarking
28
What general advice would you offer to SCC for
future member benchmarking?
29
Overall Rankings of Key Processes
  • Process Measured Benchmarked
  • Service 1 1
  • Cost 2 2
  • Financials 3 2
  • Responsiveness 4 4

30
Overall Rankings of Benchmarking Impacts on
Achieving Improved Results
  • Process Rank
  • Service 1
  • Cost 2
  • Revenue 3

31
KEY TAKE AWAYS
  • Benchmarking is an important component of supply
    chain improvement initiatives, but is still not
    practiced by many firms.
  • Most firms approach benchmarking as a narrow, not
    broad, effort.
  • Satisfaction with current efforts is lukewarm.
  • Benchmarking is not easy!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com