Clinical Trials Design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Clinical Trials Design

Description:

Clinical Trials Design Martha A. Feldman, RAC Drug & Device Development Co., Inc. P.O. Box 3515 Redmond, WA 98073-3515 USA 1-425-861-8262 FAX: 1-425-869-5854 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:350
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: Mar6135
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Clinical Trials Design


1
Clinical Trials Design
  • Martha A. Feldman, RAC
  • Drug Device Development Co., Inc.
  • P.O. Box 3515 Redmond, WA 98073-3515 USA
  • 1-425-861-8262 FAX 1-425-869-5854
  • mfeldman_at_druganddevice.com

2
Clinical Trials Design
  • Purposes of conducting clinical studies
  • Types of clinical studies
  • Ethical considerations
  • Regulatory requirements
  • Monitoring
  • Database management issues
  • Statistical considerations
  • Reports for submissions or papers

3
Purposes of Clinical Studies
  • Further scientific knowledge
  • Prove concept
  • Evaluation of product features, capabilities
  • Obtain initial safety data
  • Substantiate claim/indication for use
  • Establish degree of efficacy or effectiveness
  • Compare with competitor product marketing
    evaluation

4
Types of Clinical Studies
  • Prospective or retrospective
  • Blinded/masked or open label
  • Randomized or not
  • Active control or placebo
  • Normal subjects or patients
  • Actual or surrogate clinical endpoints
  • Statistically significant or anecdotal

5
Ethical Considerations
  • Human Subject Review IRB, Declaration of
    Helsinki
  • Informed consent, community consent, waiver of
    consent
  • Use of placebos versus positive control
  • Use of normal subjects
  • Use of investigational material in addition to
    standard care
  • Vulnerable populations

6
Regulatory Considerations
7
Drug/Therapeutic Biologic Studies
  • Overall investigation Plan
  • Phase 1 - Normal subjects usually lt 50 subjects,
    at one facility, safety parameters
  • Phase 2 - Patients about 50 - 100 subjects at
    two sites may do some dose-range assessment
    safety and some initial efficacy
  • Phase 3 - Patients few hundred to several
    thousand multiple sites main support study
  • Phase 4 - Patients (post-marketing) varies

8
Phase 1 Clinical Study
  • Normal subjects occasionally use patients
  • See if/how pharmacokinetics data from animal
    studies extrapolates to human data
  • Document pharmacodynamic effects
  • Usually open label with ascending doses
    establish dose-range
  • Build safety profile monitor adverse effects

9
Phase 2 Clinical Study
  • Patients or people with clinical condition
  • Confirm dose range is similar in such people if
    not, re-define range
  • Blinding, randomization, controls used
  • Strict entry criteria
  • Initial efficacy determination

10
Phase 3 Clinical Study
  • Few hundred to few thousand patients
  • Multiple sites
  • Blinding, randomization, controls, prospective
  • May have slightly broader entry criteria - age,
    severity of disease,
  • Continue developing safety and efficacy profiles

11
Post-marketing Study
  • Surveillance or study
  • Numbers to be negotiated
  • Parameters determined as a result of Phase 3
    study
  • May involve labeling issues

12
Device Clinical Studies
  • It Depends
  • Steps in Investigation Plan
  • Proof of concept/Feasibility lt 5 subjects or
    patients one site, safety and some effectiveness
  • Pilot study 20-50 subjects test drive
    protocol, case report forms, initial
    effectiveness and safety two sites
  • Pivotal study 50 - 500 subjects multiple sites
    main supporting study for claims

13
Proof of Concept/Feasibility Study
  • few patients (lt5)
  • limited to one site
  • usually investigator-sponsored study
  • goal prove concept, check instructions for use
    early safety and effectiveness assessments

14
Pilot Study
  • More rigorous protocol
  • May be up to 50, but usually around 20 subjects
  • One or two sites
  • Company-sponsored study
  • Test drive protocol, comparison of use at two
    sites, safety and some effectiveness data
    finalize training plan
  • Adjust final protocol for pivotal trial

15
Pivotal Study
  • The main study to support the submission
  • Subject number could be from around 100 to
    several hundred
  • Multicenter study each site should enroll
    sufficient subjects for separate analyses
  • Should demonstrate device is independent of
    inventors

16
IVD Studies
  • May be done in two parts collection of samples
    (may take gt 1 year) and use of IVD (may take lt
    1month) separate protocols
  • Collection of samples may involve dozens of
    sites testing phase may be at minimum of three
    sites
  • Study size may range for 100 (for some monitoring
    studies) to several thousand (for screening
    indication)
  • May enrich samples with stored, known, positive
    samples special IRB and consent issues

17
Monitoring
  • At least one a year on-site
  • Between visits by telephone, e-mail, FAX and
    courier services

18
Prestudy Activities
  • Investigator selection and qualification
  • Site qualification
  • additional staff
  • sufficient number of subjects
  • laboratories, pharmacies
  • special needs
  • Conduct Pre-study site visit

19
Prestudy Site Visit
  • Meet investigator, coordinators, other staff
  • Review protocol, case report forms
  • Emphasize consent procedure, requirements
  • Review adverse event procedures
  • Review investigator documentation
  • Review Regulatory Notebook
  • Visit, as needed, labs, pharmacy, etc.
  • Build study team

20
Routine, Interim Visit
  • Review regulatory notebook
  • Verify consent procedures followed
  • Ensure study eligibility criteria met
  • Compare data entries on CRFs and source data
  • Check investigational product accountability
  • Check for unreported adverse events
  • Resolve queries

21
For Cause Visit
  • Possible reasons
  • too little/too much enrollment
  • much greater number adverse events
  • badly completed case report forms
  • new coordinator/investigator needing training
  • results too good
  • Monitor has concerns about investigator or
    coordinator compliance with regulations

22
Close-Out Visit
  • Regulatory Notebook is complete
  • Supplies accountability checks out
  • All queries resolved
  • No unreported, unresolved adverse events
  • All patient follow-up completed
  • Investigators report done
  • Files prepared for FDA inspections and for storage

23
Database Management Issues
  • Programming for the case report entries
  • Developing a data entry plan data entry
    verification plan
  • Generating queries for the monitors to have
    coordinators resolve
  • Entering amended data database clean-up
  • Data editing plan
  • Closing database data validation plan send to
    statistician
  • Developing tables for the reports, submissions,
    etc.

24
Statistical Considerations
  • Developing hypotheses
  • Calculating sample size requirements
  • Developing plan for interim analysis, if needed,
    and for final analysis (including sub-analyses)
  • Determining how interim analysis results impact
    sample size
  • Perform analysis and data evaluation
  • Write statistical report

25
Sponsor Reports - Submissions
  • Adverse event reports
  • Use of investigational product without consent
  • IRB withdrawal of approval
  • Annual reports
  • Updating submissions with each advance in the
    investigational plan (e.g., study completion or
    termination)

26
Investigator Reports
  • Withdrawal of IRB approval
  • Use of product without consent
  • Adverse events - to sponsor and IRB
  • Study status reports study close-out report
  • For device studies malfunction, repair or
    replacement

27
Other Reports
  • Publications, posters, presentations
  • can review manuscript for proprietary information
  • cannot stop the publication of negative results
  • off-label use company may not promote it, but
    can distribute articles written by health care
    practitioners

28
References
  • Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21
  • Part 50 - Informed Consent
  • Part 56 Institutional Review Boards
  • Part 312 - Investigational New Drug, antibiotic,
    Biotechnology-Derived Product regulations
  • Part 812 - Investigational New Device regulations
  • FDA Guidance Document on Good Clinical Practices,
    January 1988
  • ICH Guidance Document E6 - Good Clinical Practices

29
More References
  • Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, List of
    Guidance Documents (Jan 2003) http//www.fda.gov/c
    der/guidance/guidlist.pdf
  • Clinical Evaluation of (type of) drugs
  • FDA Requirements for approval of drugs to treat
    (disease or clinical condition)
  • General considerations for the clinical
    evaluation of drugs infants and children
  • Study and evaluation of gender differences in the
    clinical evaluation of drugs

30
Even More References
  • Clinical trial sponsors on the establishment and
    operation of clinical trial data monitoring
    committee
  • ICH
  • Safety
  • Efficacy
  • Quality
  • Good Clinical Practices - January 1988
  • ICH - E6 Good Clinical Practices
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com