The Benefits of National Accreditation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


PPT – The Benefits of National Accreditation PowerPoint presentation | free to download - id: 4a8803-MGYwM


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation

The Benefits of National Accreditation


The Benefits of National Accreditation Steve Arms The NELAC Institute TNI The NELAC Institute s Mission To foster the generation of environmental data of known and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:121
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Charles589


Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Benefits of National Accreditation

The Benefits of National Accreditation
  • Steve Arms
  • The NELAC Institute
  • TNI

The NELAC Institutes Mission
  • To foster the generation of environmental data of
    known and documented quality through an open,
    inclusive, and transparent process that is
    responsive to the needs of the community

The NELAC Institutes Vision for the Future
  • A true national accreditation program, whereby
    all entities involved in the generation of
    environmental measurement data within the United
    States are accredited to one uniform, rigorous,
    and robust program that has been implemented
    consistently nationwide and focuses on the
    technical competence of the entity pursuing

TNIs Accreditation Programs
  • Designed to ensured competency
  • Intended to ensure environmental data of known
    and documented quality

An objective way of showing clients, the
community and the government that an organization
has the demonstrated capability to conduct the
services they provide.
National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation
Program (NELAP)
To establish and implement a program for the
accreditation of environmental laboratories
  • Program components
  • The recognition of accreditation bodies
  • The adoption of acceptance limits for proficiency
  • The adoption of consensus standards for use in
    the program
  • The adoption of the laboratory accreditation

National Environmental Field Accreditation
Program (NEFAP)
To establish and implement a program for the
accreditation of field sampling and measurement
organizations (FSMOs)
  • Program components
  • The recognition of accreditation bodies
  • The development and adoption of the accreditation

TNI is also pursuing the development of standards
for assuring the competency of organizations
involved in stationary source air emissions
NELAP Accreditation Unique
  • Based on an internationally recognized standard
    expanded to focus on unique aspects of
    environmental testing
  • Performed with respect to a specific scope of
    accreditation conducted by qualified assessors
  • Involves review of results of periodic
    proficiency testing performed by the laboratory

NELAP Accreditation Extensive
  • Over 1500 accredited laboratories
  • Over 2000 accreditations
  • 48 states and 1 territory
  • 8 foreign countries

Laboratory Accreditation System Program
  • Develops a system for the accreditation of
    environmental laboratories
  • Policies and procedures, interpretations,
    guidance documents, and related tools for use by
    Accreditation Bodies to implement a national
    environmental laboratory accreditation program.
  • Reviews standards for suitability
  • Subcommittee
  • National Database Committee

Our Heritage . . .
SDWA Certification Program
Explore Self Sufficiency
CLP De-facto National Program
NELAC Restructure
November 6, 2006
Explore Self Sufficiency
State Programs expand into other media
2003 NELAC Standard
The 2003 NELAC Standard Strengths
  • Uses ISO 17025 quality system approach
  • Adds specificity to improve clarity and help with
    consistency for environmental testing
  • Allows flexibility in meeting requirements
  • Represents best professional practice
  • Allows for multiple Accreditation Bodies to
    implement consistently

The 2003 NELAC Standard Weaknesses
  • Refers to an organization that no longer exists
  • Hard to find all the laboratory requirements
  • Written by chemists for chemists
  • Some language could be improved
  • Not a true consensus standard
  • Does not incorporate ISO 17011 for Accreditation
  • Muddled and outdated version of ISO 17025

A New Approach
  • Start with the purpose of an accreditation
  • Ensure key elements are retained
  • Consider the following goals
  • Easy to use and understand
  • Easy to grow and expand
  • Easy to revise and implement
  • Applicable to all laboratories

Basis of the New Standard
  • International Standards
  • ISO 17025
  • ISO 17011
  • ISO Guide 43
  • Work of NELAC from 1994 - 2003
  • Significant input from TNI membership during
    consensus voting process

Benefits of New Laboratory Standards
  • Removal of outdated NELAC language
  • Incorporation of ISO 17011
  • Incorporation of current version of ISO 17025
  • Volume/Modular approach simplifies understanding
  • Improved clarity of Technical Requirements
  • Increased flexibility
  • Very few new requirements
  • True consensus standard!!!

Format of the New Standard
  • Sector
  • Identifiable accreditation program with unique
    requirements, e.g., NELAP
  • Volume
  • Key elements of an accreditation program for a
    particular sector
  • Module
  • Specific requirements combined with other modules
    to create a volume

2008 TNI Standards
  • Volume 1 Laboratory Requirements
  • Module 1 Proficiency Testing
  • Module 2 Quality Systems General Requirements
  • Module 3 Asbestos Testing
  • Module 4 Chemical Testing
  • Module 5 Microbiological Testing
  • Module 6 Radiochemical Testing
  • Module 7 Toxicity Testing
  • Volume 2 Accreditation Body Requirements
  • Module 1 General Requirements
  • Module 3 On-Site Assessment
  • Module 2 Proficiency Testing
  • Volume 3 Proficiency Test Provider Requirements
  • Volume 4 Proficiency Testing Oversight

Benefits for the Public Confidence
  • Health and environment are being protected using
    reliable, authentic data
  • A recognized concept
  • Hospitals
  • Universities
  • Forensic laboratories

Benefits for Data Users Consumer Protection
  • Assurance that the laboratory has been evaluated
    and has met established standards
  • Reduces risks associated with unreliable data
  • Expensive re-testing
  • Legal or financial liability
  • Regulatory acceptance of data

Benefits for the Profession Advances the Field
  • Uniform standards of practice
  • A venue to share knowledge
  • Professional interaction in consensus
  • Forum for improvement

Benefits for Agencies Assurance that data is
adequate for use
  • Dependable environmental decisions based on data
    that is
  • Accurate
  • Traceable
  • Reproducible
  • Reduced uncertainty
  • Increased public confidence in governmental
    management of the environment

Benefits for Agencies Efficient allocation of
  • A single set of standards to manage
  • Cost effective
  • Data can be used by multiple stakeholders
  • Redundant assessments by QA oversight bodies can
    be reduced

Benefits for Agencies Efficient allocation of
  • Reduced direct costs due to problems
  • Less re-testing
  • Less re-sampling
  • Less lost time
  • Fewer false positives and negatives
  • Reduced effort needed to define project
    expectations and requirements
  • More constant baseline expectations for
    environmental projects
  • More efficient communications regarding Data
    Quality Objectives and project deliverables

Benefits for the Organization Self-evaluation
  • Improved training program and communication
  • Improved processes and procedures
  • Improved internal consistency
  • Reduction in QC incidents, rejections and

Benefits for the Organization Self-evaluation
  • Promotes continuous improvement attitude
  • Effective system for accountability
  • Reputation benchmark for maintaining competence
  • Improved employee quality awareness
  • A Better Quality System!

Benefits for the Organization and for
Accreditation Bodies A Nationally Consistent
  • An industry hindered by political boundaries
  • Opportunities for reciprocity and recognition
  • Removal of barriers
  • Reduced time and expense caused by redundancy

The Florida Experience
  • All environmental testing laboratories are held
    to the same standard
  • Assessment consistency has improved
  • Marginal labs have become acceptable
  • Environmental decisions are now clearly traceable
    to documented data
  • Benefits of mutual recognition realized

A Self-Nourishing Concept Opportunities for
Quality Improvements
  • The TNI standards development process encourages
    pooling of expertise from multiple governmental
    agencies and private sector groups.
  • A larger scope of expertise strengthens the
    quality concepts and practices upon which the
    standards are based.
  • Having additional requirements for laboratory
    assessments facilitates the expansion of the
    scope of accreditation programs and improves the
    abilities of the assessors.
  • Result better assessments and ultimately better
    laboratories and data!

Thank You!