Chapter 4 - Evaluating Financial Performance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 4 - Evaluating Financial Performance

Description:

Chapter 4 - Evaluating Financial Performance Financial Analysis process of assessing financial condition of a firm Principal analytic tool is the financial ratio – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: ChuckSc7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 4 - Evaluating Financial Performance


1
Chapter 4 - Evaluating Financial Performance
  • Financial Analysis process of assessing
    financial condition of a firm
  • Principal analytic tool is the financial ratio
  • Understand ratios and what they mean

2
Ratio Analysis
  • Identify firms strengths and weaknesses
  • Comparison of the firm over time or with other
    firms
  • Industry averages benchmarks
  • Robert Morris Associates, Dun Bradstreet
  • Four types of ratios liquidity, efficiency,
    leverage and profitability

3
Ratios and Major Questions
  • How liquid is the firm?
  • Are adequate operating profits being generated?
  • How is the firm financing its assets?
  • Are shareholders receiving an adequate return?

4
How Liquid is the Firm?
  • Liquidity ability to meet maturing obligations
  • Enough resources to pay when due?
  • How do liquid assets compare with debt?
  • Compare cash and assets to be converted to cash
    with debt due in same period
  • Can firm convert receivables/inventories to cash
    on timely basis? How quick or long?

5
Liquidity
  • Current ratio conventional wisdom says 21 but
    there is the lettuce problem.
  • Acid test or quick ratio (CA - Inv)/ CL
  • Collection period how many days to collect
    receivables AR / DCrS say 20
  • Turnover how many times are AR rolled over
    during a year? CS/AR say 18 X
  • By most of these measures, McD less liquid

6
Collection Period Turnover
  • Measure the same thing are reciprocals
  • 365 days 17.9 X 365 Days 20.4days
  • 20.4 days 17.9 X
  • McD not good at collections (20 days vs. 7)
  • Are longer credit terms good or bad?
  • Competitive necessity or weak management ?
  • Receivables aging good footnote

7
Inventory Turnover
  • Turnover Ratio Cost of Goods Sold
  • (Times per year) Inventory
  • Why COGS? Need cost-based numbers in numerator
    and denominator
  • If less liquid, greater chance to be unable to
    pay on time.
  • McD excellent inventory management (87 times a
    year versus 35)

8
Cash Conversion Cycle
  • To reduce working capital, speed up collections,
    turn inventory faster, slow disbursements
  • Sum of days required to collect days in
    inventory - Days of Payable Outstanding
  • DPO Accounts Payable say 29
  • COGS / 365

9
Operating Profits Adequate?
  • Text tells us to use operating profits
  • GP ignores marketing exp NP includes financing
    effects
  • OIROI Operating Income Return on Investment
    op profits relative to assets
  • OIROI Operating Income
  • Total Assets
  • McD generates more income per of assets

10
OIROI
  • Separate OIROI into its two pieces
  • OIROI OPM TAT
  • 15.4 23.4 .66
  • Operating Profit Margin Op. Income
  • Sales
  • Managements effectiveness in keeping costs in
    line with sales McD very good

11
Total Asset Turnover
  • TAT Sales .66
  • Total Assets
  • Amount of sales generated by 1 of assets
  • Higher turnover better good use of asset
  • McD weak 0.66 in sales per of assets
  • Wheres the problem? Check components

12
Total Asset Turnover
  • McD very weak. But why?
  • Turnover McDonalds Peers
  • Receivables 17.9 X Bad 56
  • Inventory 87 Good 35
  • Fixed Assets .84 Bad 3.2

13
OIROI Summary
  • OIROI Operating Inc. Sales
  • Sales Total Assets
  • McD effectively keeps costs and operating
    expenses low, but is not particularly good in
    managing its assets
  • Overall, they are doing better than the
    competitors OIROI 15. 4 versus 11.6

14
How Does Firm Finance Assets?
  • What percentage of assets are financed by debt
    and how much by equity?
  • Debt includes all liabilities, both short and
    long-term
  • Debt Ratio Total Debt
  • Total Assets
  • McD uses significantly less debt (54 vs 69)

15
Times Interest Earned
  • TIE how much operating income is available to
    meet interest expense? Or, how many times is it
    covering annual interest?
  • TIE Operating Income 7.5 Times
  • Interest Expense
  • McD no problem in paying int. Op. Inc. could
    fall to 1/7th of current level and still pay
    (1/7.5)

16
Adequate Returns?
  • Are stockholders receiving an adequate return on
    their investment? Is it attractive compared to
    other companies?
  • Return on Com Equity Net Income
  • Common
    Equity
  • Equity PV P-I RE but no preferred stock
  • McD profitability fully offsets low leverage

17
What Can We Say About McD
  • Its liquidity is average even with low receivable
    turnover good on inventory
  • OIROI is goodgood profitability offsets low
    asset turnover
  • Uses less debt than competitors
  • Good Return on Equity uses less debt but this
    offset by greater profitability.

18
Limitations With Ratios
  • Difficult to identify industry categories
  • No exact peers
  • Averages are only approximates
  • Accounting principles differ
  • Ratios can be too high or too low
  • Industry averages include stars and dogs
  • However, ratios are still useful tools

19
Unmentioned Problems
  • Old firm versus new
  • Have assets been depreciated?
  • Window dressing
  • Actions to make good at year end
  • Role of revolvers
  • Some ratios make you look good, others make look
    bad
  • Overall look at several combinations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com