Stereotypes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 59
About This Presentation
Title:

Stereotypes

Description:

Stereotypes What they are and what they do Class Exercise: Write a definition of stereotype List some racial stereotypes of an out-group List some racial ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:994
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 60
Provided by: MikhailL7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Stereotypes


1
Stereotypes
  • What they are and what they do

2
Class Exercise
  • Write a definition of stereotype
  • List some racial stereotypes of an out-group
  • List some racial stereotypes of your in-group
  • Underline (mentally, if you wish) stereotypes
    that you endorse

3
Stereotypes are often (inaccurately) stereotyped
  • Typical mainstream definitions
  • a conventional, formulaic, and oversimplified
    conception, opinion, or image (dictionary.com)
  • a standardized mental picture that is held in
    common by members of a group and that represents
    an oversimplified opinion, prejudiced attitude,
    or uncritical judgment (webster.com)
  • a generalized image of a person or group, which
    does not acknowledge individual differences and
    which is often prejudicial to that person or
    group. (remember.org)

4
An activity from Remember.org
  • a) All athletes are
  • b) People on welfare are all
  • c) He's a cheap
  • d) Drugs are used by virtually
  • e) All homosexuals are
  • f) All politicians are
  • g) All people with AIDS are
  • h) All people who sleep on grates are
  • i) All Christian Fundamentalists are
  • j) All male hairdressers are
  • k) All male ballet dancers are
  • l) All Jewish mothers are
  • m) All Harvard graduates are
  • n) All construction workers are
  • o) He's so dumb, he must be
  • p) He's so smart, he must be
  • q) He's quick-tempered, so he must be
  • r) He drinks like a fish, so he must be
  • s) He likes watermelon, and so does every
  • Have students complete the following sentences,
    then break up into small groups to compare their
    answers and discuss if there is any prejudice and
    bigotry in their answers or in those of their
    classmates, as well as what factors (e.g.,
    television, newspapers, friendships, attitudes of
    their parents) may have contributed to such
    prejudice

5
Why the definitions are misleading
  • Stereotypes are not necessarily
    overgeneralizations or over-simplifications. To
    the contrary, they are often contextually based
    (Brown, 2000).
  • Stereotypes are not necessarily false or
    erroneous beliefs. They can be accurate
    statements about base rates (McCauley) that
    represent real group differences (i.e., many
    stereotypes are prototypes).
  • Stereotypes have many useful functions

6
Sowhat are stereotypes?
  • Stereotypes are
  • Automatic and sometimes unconscious cognitive
    processes shared by many people and used by
    individuals to perceive and make sense of their
    environment
  • Shared group beliefs regarding specific traits
    that are attributed to people based on group
    membership
  • may be accurate or false
  • may be positive or negative
  • may be conscious or implicit (unconscious)
  • may be (consciously) endorsed or rejected
  • may or may not have an impact on behavior
  • have both positive and negative functions
  • may have either positive or negative outcomes

7
Related definitions
  • Prejudice (affect)
  • An attitude (usually negative) toward a
    distinguishable group or an individual member of
    that group based on group membership and without
    just ground (i.e., pre-judging).
  • Discrimination
  • Negative or harmful action (behavior) directed
    toward a distinguishable group or an individual
    member of that group based on group membership.
  • Any distinction, exclusion, restriction or
    preference based on race, color, descent, or
    national or ethnic origin which has the purpose
    or effect of nullifying or impairing the
    recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal
    footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms
    in the political, economic, social, cultural or
    any other field of public life (UN International
    Convention)

8
Why are stereotypes shared?
  • Two possible explanations
  • Stereotypes as individual beliefs (social
    cognition)
  • A common environment provides similar stimulus
    experience to different people and therefore
    similar stereotypes emerge.
  • Stereotypes as collective belief systems
    (cultural perspective)
  • A shared cultural pool of knowledge, social
    representations, ideology or culture from which
    different people sample and it is this which
    produces the commonality of views.
  • Conclusion Stereotypes are shared by members of
    groups not just through the coincidence of common
    experience or the existence of shared knowledge
    within society, but because the members of groups
    act to coordinate their behavior.

9
The benefits of stereotypes
  • Helps one deal with the social world more
    efficiently by simplifying the environment
    (cognitive miser hypothesis). This is useful as
    long as our understanding of base rates is
    relatively accurate.
  • Helps people fit in and identify with social
    group by underscoring the positive features of
    the in-group, relative to out-groups (social
    identity theory).
  • May serve a defensive function stereotyping
    others may make us feel better about ourselves
    (self-serving bias)
  • In drama, allows quick introduction of characters
    that the audience understands and relates to
    (see http//en.wikipedia.org/
    wiki/List_of_heroic_stock_characters)

10
The problem with stereotypes
  • Stereotypes get in the way of critical and
    complex thinking and can prevent us from more
    complex understanding
  • Unexamined stereotypes may not represent all, or
    perhaps even most individuals within a group and,
    therefore, lead to misunderstanding
  • Some stereotypes enhance our own self-identity by
    devaluing others and, in so doing, serve as the
    foundation for prejudice and discrimination
  • Stereotypes can be obstacles in getting to know
    others as they really are versus how we think
    they might be
  • Stereotypes can Stereotypes can serve to maintain
    systems of privilege and injustice

11
Development of stereotypesPsychodynamic
approach (1940s-1950s)
  • The authoritarian personality ethnocentrism,
    fascism, homophobia, and anti-Semitism part of
    authoritarian syndrome
  • Raised in a family highly structured and focused
    around the traditional authority of the father
    (usually)
  • Climate of repression prevents expression of
    hostility in order not to explode, hostility and
    aggression must be projected
  • Due to family background, thinking is rigid,
    dichotomous, and stereotyped (i.e., the closed
    mind )

12
Development of stereotypesValidity of
psychodynamic approach
  • Original studies promising, but...
  • 1958 southern state study
  • White subjects showed high levels of anti-Black
    prejudice, regardless of whether or not
    personality was authoritarian.
  • 1952 Virginia mine study
  • 80 of white miners exhibited friendship and
    solidarity toward Black co-workers at work
  • Out of the mines, lt 20 of the white miners
    maintained friendly relations with Black
    colleagues
  • Individual personality differences cannot explain
    why prejudice is almost uniform in some cultures
    or predict which target will be chosen and when.

13
Development of stereotypesSocio-cultural
approach
  • Social Learning Theory stereotypes are learned
    through direct observation of group differences
    or from exposure to media and other information
    (remember the Bobo doll studies?)
  • Illusory Correlationstendency to see
    relationships between events that are unrelated
    (e.g., Jane Elliots exercisewe will watch this
    in class Thursday)
  • Most likely to happen when an event stands out
  • Woman who is a very aggressive CEO
  • You may then notice women who are in positions of
    power and who are aggressive
  • Leads to illusory correlation between women
    leaders and aggressiveness

14
Development of stereotypesSocio-cultural
approach (cont.)
  • Kernel of Truth Hypothesis considers whether
    stereotypes that people commonly hold may in fact
    be partially accurate
  • Racial stereotypes are formed in part due to
    group SES differences In the U.S., Blacks can be
    observed more often than whites in roles that
    imply less competence and less power. Due to
    conflation of race and class, class differences
    are attributed to race
  • Stereotypes of Jews as cheap and as trying to
    make money
  • Whats the kernel of truth?
  • Where does the kernel come from?
  • Whats the rest of the truth?

15
Development of stereotypesSocio-cultural
approach (cont.)
  • Cognitive dissonance theory tendency for
    individuals to seek consistency between behaviors
    and beliefs as well as among their different
    beliefs and opinions.
  • Information in conflict with belief system is
    unpleasant something must change to relieve
    dissonance
  • Information in contrast to belief is avoided,
    actively refuted, or seen as an exception
  • Stereotypes are reinforced

16
Development of stereotypes Socio-cultural
approach
  • Mass media
  • Man bites dog standard of what is newsworthy
    leads to illusory correlations even in
    politically unbiased media
  • Black on white crime
  • Palestinians throwing rocks at armed Israelis
  • Most media outlets are not politically neutral

17
Support for the Sociocultural theory
  • Large numbers of observers share similar
    stereotypes of a given target group and these
    stereotypes are relatively stable over time but
    also somewhat adaptive
  • Example Katz Braly (1952/1933)--Princeton
    students stereotypes of the Japanese
  • In 1933 intelligent, industrious, progressive
  • In 1951 sly, shrewd
  • In 1969 same as in 1933

18
The Role of Social Cognition
19
Categorization
  • Categorization is the classification of persons
    into groups, often on the basis of common
    attributes.
  • Unintentional, effortless, automatic activity of
    the mind
  • Culturally shared
  • Assimilation vs. differentiation
  • Key Points
  • We create the categories categories are not an
    essential part of the natural world
  • How we categorize tends to be culturally
    influenced and shared and has social and
    political implications
  • Items grouped together tend to be viewed more
    alike than actuality items in different
    categories may have their differences
    exaggerated.
  • Once person is categorized into a group (e.g.,
    gender, race), we bring into play knowledge
    contained in the category (our schemas, our
    stereotypes)
  • Leads to ingroup/outgroup dynamics.

20
In-group Out-group Dynamics
  • In-group group with which an individual
    identifies and feels a member of (ILL-INI)
  • Out-group group with which an individual does
    not identify (Muck Fichigan)
  • In-group bias Positive feelings and special
    treatment for people defined as part of our
    in-group

21
Class Demonstration
  1. Distribute 1000
  2. Rate how much you like group members
  3. Rate group members personality, academic
    performance
  4. Distribute unpleasant task (e.g., transcribing
    video)

22
Tajfel (1982) Minimal Group Experiment
  • Placed complete strangers in groups based on
    trivial criteria (e.g., a coin toss). Results
    indicated
  • More liking for members of own group
  • Rated ingroup members more positively (on
    personality and work performance)
  • Gave more money and rewards to ingroup members
  • Why?

23
Drawbacks to Social Categorization
  • Outgroup homogeneity the perception that
    individuals in the outgroup are more similar to
    each other than they really are
  • Leads us to overestimate the difference between
    groups and underestimate the differences within
    groups
  • Reinforces stereotypes
  • Reinforces Us versus Them mentality

24
The Cognitive Miser Hypothesis
  • Bodenhausen (1990)
  • 189 students Considering only your own feeling
    best rhythm, at what time would you get up if
    you were entirely free to plan your day? (6
    AM, 8 AM, 11 AM)
  • Students divided into two groups Morning-type
    person or evening-type person
  • Morning types High attention early in day Low
    attention later in day
  • Evening types Low attention early in day High
    attention later in day

25
Cognitive Miser Hypothesis (cont.)
  • Students asked to read about a campus crime in
    which the evidence was mixed and then rate the
    guilt of the suspect who was either White or
    Latino. Ratings occurred either early in the day
    or late in the day.
  • What would we expect based on the cognitive miser
    hypothesis in terms of when stereotyping would
    occur?

26
Who should stereotype more late in the day?
27
Who should stereotype more early in the day?
28
Are stereotypes automatic?
  • Groups can prime stereotypical thoughts and
    thoughts can prime stereotypical groups
  • Automatic processing occurs when stimulus is
    encountered causing the stereotype to be
    accessed. Happens without conscious awareness
  • Controlled processing occurs with awareness
    conscious choice to disregard or ignore the
    stereotyped information
  • Hard choice (Fiske, 1989)

29
2002 Institute of Medicine Report
  • When Latinos and African Americans were treated
    by physicians for a broken bone in their leg,
    they received pain medication significantly less
    often than white patients with the same injury.
    Minorities are less likely to be given
    appropriate cardiac medications or to undergo
    bypass surgery, and are less likely to receive
    kidney dialysis or transplants. By contrast, they
    are more likely to receive certain less-desirable
    procedures, such as lower limb amputations for
    diabetes and other conditions.

30
The Implicit Association Test
  • Every man has reminiscences which he would not
    tell to everyone but only his friends. He has
    other matters in his mind which he would not
    reveal even to his friends, but only to himself,
    and that in secret. But there are other things
    which a man is afraid to tell even to himself,
    and every decent man has a number of such things
    stored away in his mind (Dostoyevsky)

Take the IAT at https//implicit.harvard.edu/impli
cit/
  • Demonstration video at http//www.youtube.com/wat
    ch?v2RSVz6VEybk

31
IAT results
32
IAT over the lifespan
Replicated with preferences for flowers vs.
insects
33
Stereotypes and Biased Processing
  • Stereotypes impacts processing of new information
  • Biased information seeking
  • Biased attention to information
  • Biased memory for information
  • Biased attributions for behavior
  • Confirmatory biases
  • Stereotypes resistant to change

34
Stereotype Suppression
  • Stereotype suppression trying to consciously
    avoid using a stereotype.
  • Suppression can be counter-productive
  • Macrae et al. (1994) Participants wrote
    5-minute stories
  • Phase 1 write a story about a day in the life of
    a skinhead
  • Group 1 told to suppress stereotypes ? wrote less
    stereotypic passages
  • Group 2 no instructions about stereotypes
    (control group)
  • Phase 2 Tell another story about a day in the
    life of a skinhead
  • Participants who had suppressed wrote more
    stereotypic second passages ? A rebound effect

35
Review
  • Stereotypes are often inaccurately stereotyped
  • Stereotypes have negative and positive features
  • No single pathway to stereotype development
  • Psychodynamic theory (authoritarian personality)
  • Social learning theory (illusory correlations)
  • Sociocultural theory (kernel of truth)
  • Social categ./identity theories (minimal groups)
  • Cognitive miser (early birds vs night owls)
  • Stereotypes are automaticbut can be rejected
  • Stereotypes are self-reinforcing (cog.
    dissonance)
  • Stereotype-suppression can lead to rebounding

36
The issue of internalization
  • The big issue Do targets of prejudice and
    stereotyping accept the negative evaluations and
    beliefs directed toward them?
  • 1. Do internalized evaluations and beliefs
    interfere with individual achievement and lower
    self-esteem?
  • 2. Can being a target of racial stereotypes
    elicit actual stereotypical behavior from
    targets?
  • 3. Do internalized evaluations and beliefs lead
    members of subordinate groups to accept their
    subordinate position?

37
The long-term effects of exposure to prejudice
and stereotypes
  • Common Assumption Negative stereotypes should
    result in lower self-esteem among members of
    stigmatized groups.
  • BUT
  • Crocker and Major (1989) reviewed 20 years of
    research and found no evidence that members of
    stigmatized or subordinate groups had lower
    self-esteem.
  • Targets of prejudice and stereotyping can defend
    themselves in three ways
  • By making ingroup comparisons only
  • By attributing negative outcomes to
    discrimination rather than personal failure
  • Through disidentification

38
Stereotype Threat
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?vtjn6ZSU_zS0

39
Stereotype Threat
  • Stereotype Threat (Steele Aronson, 1995) The
    threat of confirming as self-characteristic, a
    negative stereotype about ones group.
  • Steele Aronson (1995)
  • White and Black students took a brief test based
    on GRE
  • Randomly assigned to three conditions
  • Diagnostic condition The test is diagnostic of
    intellectual ability
  • Non-diagnostic condition The test is a tool for
    studying problem-solving
  • Non-diagnostic challenge condition The test is
    problem solving and challenge

40
Steele and Aronson (study 1)
41
Steele and Aronson (Study 3)
57 items about things you enjoy (e.g., rap,
classical music, basketball, tennis)
1. _ _ CE 2. _ _ ACK 3. MI_ _ _ _ _ _
1. DU_ _ 2. SHA_ _ 3. _ _ _ ERIOR
42
Steele and Aronson (Study 3, cont.)
43
Steele and Aronson (Study 4)
  • Question
  • Is it sufficient simply to prime race in a
    context in which racial stereotype threat is
    thought to exist?

44
Ryan and Anthony (2006)
  • Question
  • Would stereotype threat also emerge on actual IQ
    tests?

45
Martens, Johns, Greenberg, Schimel (2006)
  • Question
  • Is it possible to reduce stereotype threat?

Study 1
Study 2
46
Implications of stereotype threat
  • Racial disparities in IQ and academic achievement
    may be PARTLY explained by negative racial
    stereotypes
  • Programs designed to help disadvantaged groups
    may also present threats to self
  • Affirmative action programs imply that its
    recipients are inferior and cant get by without
    special help (Shelby Steele, 1990)
  • Evidence
  • Schneider et al. (1996) Compared to those who
    didnt, Blacks who received unsolicited help from
    a White student reported depressive feelings and
    lower self-esteem.
  • Nacoste (1985) Women who gained access to a
    group simply because they were women expressed
    fewer positive emotions and thought the admission
    procedure was less fair.
  • BUT
  • Pratkanis and Turner (1996) Effect of
    affirmative action on recipients depends on how
    program is framed. If presented as a way of
    removing or offsetting past discrimination, it
    doesnt lower recipient self-esteem.

47
The issue of internalization
  • The big issue Do targets of prejudice and
    stereotyping accept the negative evaluations and
    beliefs directed toward them?
  • 1. Do internalized evaluations and beliefs
    interfere with individual achievement and lower
    self-esteem?
  • 2. Can being a target of racial stereotypes
    elicit actual stereotypical behavior from
    targets?
  • 3. Do internalized evaluations and beliefs lead
    members of subordinate groups to accept their
    subordinate position?

48
Stereotypes Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
  • Person X has stereotype of out-group member
  • Person X interacts with out-group member based on
    stereotype
  • Out-group member responds to Person X
  • Person X interprets out-group members behavior
    as consistent with stereotype
  • Snyder (1984) Men who anticipated talking with
    an attractive woman perceived the woman to be
    more sociable and tended to act in a warm and
    friendly manner
  • Men who spoke to an unattractive woman behaved in
    a more cold and reserved manner

49
Racial stereotypes and the self-fulfilling
prophesy
Word, Zanna, Cooper (1974)
  • White participants interviewed both Black and
    White interviewees.
  • The White interviewers sat farther away,
    conducted shorter interviews, and made more
    speech errors when interviewing Blacks.
  • As a result, Black interviewees were seen as more
    nervous and less effective.
  • But in a second study, both Black and White
    interviewees did worse when interviewers were
    told to sit farther away, conduct shorter
    interviews, and so on.

50
Limits of the self-fulfilling prophecy
  • Hilton and Darley (1985) self-fulfilling
    prophecy effects go away when the target knows of
    the perceivers stereotypical expectations
  • Jussim and Fleming (1996)
  • Reviewed all published studies of the
    self-fulfilling prophecy
  • The effect occurs reliably, but it is weak
    accounts for only about 4 of stereotype-confirmin
    g behavior.

51
The issue of internalization
  • The big issue Do targets of prejudice and
    stereotyping accept the negative evaluations and
    beliefs directed toward them?
  • 1. Do internalized evaluations and beliefs
    interfere with individual achievement and lower
    self-esteem?
  • 2. Can being a target of racial stereotypes
    elicit actual stereotypical behavior from
    targets?
  • 3. Do internalized evaluations and beliefs lead
    members of subordinate groups to accept their
    subordinate position?

52
Disidentification
  • Disidentification as a social problem
  • Disidentification protects self-esteem, but
    undermines academic success.
  • This can reinforce inequalities already produced
    by a history of discrimination.
  • How can it be dealt with? Steele suggests
  • Optimistic guidance
  • Challenge over remediation
  • Stressing the expandability of intelligence
  • Affirming domain belongingness and role models

53
Political responses to being a target of
prejudice and stereotyping
  • Theories of internalization suggest that targets
    should accept their subordinate position, but
    this doesnt always happen.
  • e.g., Schuman et al (1997) Blacks are far less
    likely to endorse negative evaluations of their
    own group and are far more supportive of policies
    aimed at reducing racial inequality
  • A stronger sense of group identification and
    acts of political resistance are just as
    likely.
  • When do members of subordinate groups accept
    their fate, and when do they resist?

54
Political responses to being a target of
prejudice and stereotyping
  • Doosje and Ellemers (1997)
  • Highly-identified members are more likely to
    stick with the ingroup and take collective action
    when others attribute low status to their group.
  • Low identifiers individually dissociate
    themselves from the ingroup when faced with low
    status.

55
Stereotypes in the news
  • Ok or not Ok?

56
A marketing campaign
  • "Wong Brothers Laundry Service -- Two Wongs Can
    Make It White." 
  • "Abercrombie and Fitch Buddha Bash -- Get Your
    Buddha on the Floor"

57
Halloween Displays
58
More displays
59
The news coverage
  • http//video.msn.com/video.aspx?mkten-usbrandms
    nbcvid41d2a3de-9c97-493f-8322-10d18bac0541
  • http//www.truveo.com/Was-Halloween-noose-racist/i
    d/2554693601
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com