Example of the Final Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Example of the Final Project

Description:

Newton s second law of motion Author: PHYSICS & ASTRONOMY Last modified by: feizhou Created Date: 9/21/2005 9:43:49 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: phy107
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Example of the Final Project


1
Example of the Final Project
  • Possible Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions by
    Replacing Incandescent Lights with Compact
    Fluorescent Lights (CFL)

2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • What are CFLs and why are they more efficient
    than incandescent bulbs?
  • How much energy can be saved per year in British
    Columbia of all incandescent light bulbs are
    replaced with CFLs?
  • What is the effect on the CO2 emissions?

3
Introduction
  • Government web pages and media suggest replacing
    incandescent light bulbs with compact fluorescent
    light bulbs to save energy.
  • We want to know how much energy is saved per
    household and estimate the energy savings in BC
    if all the home lights were replaced by CFLs.
  • We also estimate the corresponding reduction in
    CO2 emissions.
  • In our estimates, we take into account energy
    used to manufacture incandescent bulbs and CFLs.
    For the estimate of the BC energy savings, we
    assume that ½ of all lights could be replaced by
    CFLs on average.

4
What is a CFL?
  • Ordinary incandescent light bulbs emit light due
    to electrical heating of a thin tungsten wire.
    They convert only a few to visible light (Lab
    8). 90 95 of the electrical energy is
    converted into heat.
  • A CFL is based on light emission from a gas
    discharge An electric current is driven through
    a gas ionizing the gas molecules. The
    recombination of ions and electrons results in
    light emission.
  • For the same light output as a 60 W light bulb a
    CFL needs only 13 W of electrical power.
  • (Source Wikipedia)

5
How many light bulbs can we replace in BC?
  • Number of households in BC 1 600 000 (in 2004)
  • (http//www.env.gov.bc.ca/air/airquality/pdfs/wood
    _emissions.pdf)
  • Estimated number of lights 20 per household.
  • Estimate that due to the light quality issues,
    fixtures and so on, ½ of the light bulbs will be
    replaced 10 per household on average.
  • This includes the fact that some light bulbs were
    already replaced by CFLs in the past.
  • Total light bulbs that could be replaced 10
    bulbs per household ? 1 600 000 households 16
    000 000 light bulbs

6
How much energy would be saved annually due to
replacing these bulbs?
  • Assume each bulb is switched on an average of 4
    hours/day
  • Average power 60 W. Replaced by 13 W CFL
    Savings of 47 W per bulb replaced
  • Each home would save10 ? 47 W ? (4 h/d ? 3600
    s/h ? 365 d/y) 2.5?109 J per household per
    year.
  • For the whole province2.5?109 J ? 1 600 000
    households 4?1015 J per year

7
What would be the total reduction in CO2
Emissions?
  • CO2 emissions in the US are 1.34 pounds (0.608
    kg) of CO2 per kWh averaged over all methods of
    generating electricity
  • (1998 2000, Source US Government, DOE).
  • Conversion between kWh and J1kWh 1000 J/s ?
    3600 s/h ? 1h 3.6?106 J
  • Annual reduction in CO2 emissions is 4?1015 J
    per year ? (1kWh / 3.6?106 J) ? 0.705 kg/kWh
    8?108 kg of CO2 per year in BC

8
What would be the percentage decrease in energy
consumption?
  • Total BC power production 53 000 GWhours
    53?109kWh ? 3.6?106 J/kWh 2?1017 J
  • (http//www.bchydro.com/rx_files/info/info46749.pd
    f)
  • The savings of 4?1015 J by switching to CFLs
    would decrease our provincial energy consumptions
    by 2

9
Net Energy Savings
  • BC generates most of its power from hydro power
    and only 10 from fossil fuels. So is there less
    benefit?
  • Energy market is international and so is
    pollution Energy saved here will still impact
    global carbon emissions.
  • But we need to include energy needed to produce
    the CFLs and light bulbs. Hard to find numbers
    Higher manufacturing cost of CFL is offset by its
    much longer lifetime
  • Lifetime 10 000 h (CFL) vs 1000 h
    (incandescent) (Source Wikipedia)
  • So the raw energy savings we estimated in the
    previous slides are approximately equal to the
    net energy savings.

10
Negative Effects
  • CFLs and other fluorescent lamps have small
    amount of mercury ( 20 mg Hg) .
  • Since mercury is toxic, CFLs should be recycled.
    Ordinary fluorescent bulbs can be recycled and
    almost all of the mercury can be recovered.
  • (Source www.worldwise.com)
  • Heat?
  • Quality of light?
  • http//www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?story
    Id7431198

11
Conclusion
  • Replacing incandescent bulbs with CFL leads to
    significant savings in energy (and money).
  • BCs energy consumption would decrease by
    approximately 2 if all households would replace.
  • Higher production cost of CFLs are offset by much
    longer lifetime.
  • Concerns about mercury content in CFLs could be
    addressed by mandatory recycling programs.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com