Fitting and Evaluation of FM Systems for Cochlear Implant Users - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Fitting and Evaluation of FM Systems for Cochlear Implant Users

Description:

Fitting and Evaluation of FM Systems for Cochlear Implant Users Linda M. Thibodeau Cochlear Implants and FM Systems THREE BASIC WAYS TO USE FM SYSTEMS WITH CIs Audio ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:121
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: LindaTh1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fitting and Evaluation of FM Systems for Cochlear Implant Users


1
Fitting and Evaluation of FM Systems for
Cochlear Implant Users
  • Linda M. Thibodeau

2
Cochlear Implants and FM Systems
  • THREE BASIC WAYS TO USE
  • FM SYSTEMS WITH CIs
  • Audio Coupling
  • Desktop Soundfield FM systems
  • Electrical Coupling
  • Patch cords connect FM Receiver to CI
  • Direct Plug-in of FM Receiver
  • T-Coil Coupling
  • Processor has t-coil to receive electromagnetic
    signal from the Body-worn FM system with Neckloop

3
Electrical Coupling- FM and CI
  • BODY-LEVEL PROCESSORS
  • COCHLEAR
  • IMPLANTS EAR-LEVEL
  • PROCESSORS
  • BODY-LEVEL
  • FM RECEIVERS RECEIVERS
  • EAR-LEVEL
  • RECEIVERS

4
Body-worn Speech Processor
Ear-level Speech Processor

Body-Worn FM Receiver
Miniature Direct-Connect FM Receiver

Miniature Cord-Connect FM Receivers
5
T-Coil Coupling- FM and CI
Requires Speech Processor with T-Coil such
as Nucleus 3G

6
Verification Procedures for the CIFM Interface
  • 1) Informal Testing
  • 2) Behavioral Testing
  • 3) Electroacoustic Testing

7
Verification Procedures for the CIFM Interface
  • 1) Informal Testing

8
Informal Testing
Informal Testing
  • Can be performed by the classroom teacher
  • Quick and easy way to determine that CI and FM
    are functioning
  • 3 Types
  • 1. Using a speaker
  • 2. Using monitor earphones
  • 3. Performing a listening Check subjective
    response required from child

9
Speaker for Cord-Connect and Direct Connect
Receivers
Informal Testing
  • Plug the FM receiver into an amplifier speaker
  • Radio Shack Mini Amplifier Speaker
  • (Cat. No. 277-1008C)
  • Speak into the transmitter microphone
  • Listen to the output through the amplifier
    speaker

10
Monitor Earphones
Informal Testing
  • Can hear output from CI mic. before it is
    processed and sent to the electrode array
  • Can hear output for input to CI and FM
    simultaneously
  • Available for Nucleus Processors
  • 1. ESPrit 3G BTE
  • 2. SPrint Body-Worn

ESPrit 3G with Monitor Earphones
SPrint with Monitor Earphones
  • --Can listen to output from input to CI
    microphone for ESPrit 22
  • and 24 BTEs, but cannot listen to or plug in the
    FM at the same time

11
Monitor Earphones
Informal Testing
  • Other BTE speech processors that have monitor
    earphones
  • ESPrit 22
  • ESPrit 24
  • Can listen to output when there is input to CI
    microphone via the earphone, but
  • cannot plug in the FM Receiver at the SAME time!

12
Procedure for Using Monitor Earphones
Informal Testing
  • Connect FM and monitor earphones
  • Turn on Speech Processor, FM transmitter, FM
    receiver
  • Speak into both CI and FM microphones separately

13
Listening Check
Informal Testing
  • KEY TO LISTENING CHECKS
  • Must give input to both microphones separately
  • Have the child repeat or act out what you say
  • 1. Ling ah, oo, ee, sh, ss, mm
  • 2. Numbers one, two, three
  • 3. Count syllables ba, ba, ba
  • 4. Long or short baaaaa, ba ba ba
  • 5. Simple commands Hide your face
  • 6. Speech awareness with play rings, blocks,
    etc

www.cochlearamericas.com
14
Verification Procedures for the CIFM Interface
  • 2) Behavioral Testing

15
Behavioral Testing in the Booth
Behavioral Testing
  • A modified ASHA procedure is used for behavioral
  • testing with FM systems
  • ?Speech recognition is the most effective way to
    measure behavioral benefit with an FM system

16
Testing Equipment for Speech Recognition
Behavioral Testing
  • Soundbooth with soundfield
  • speaker and seating at a
  • zero degrees azimuth
  • Audiometer that allows
  • for live voice speech recognition (SR)
    testing
  • Appropriate SR material with multiple lists

17
Setup for Testing a Child with a CI
Behavioral Testing
  • ?Seat the child at 0 degrees azimuth
  • Check CI functioning with monitor earphones or
  • informal listening check
  • ?Select presentation level for stimuli that is
    appropriate
  • for the childs hearing thresholds -Ideally
    35 dBSL

18
Acronyms
  • Cochlear Implant Alone
  • BCI55
  • BCI55/50
  • Cochlear Implant FM System
  • BFMCI55/50
  • BFMCI55

19
Measure Speech Recognition with CI alone
Behavioral Testing
  • BCI55
  • Measure SR in quiet with the CI alone
  • BCI55/50
  • Measure SR in noise with the CI alone at a
  • 5 SNR

20
Measure Speech Recognition with CI Interfaced
with FM System
Behavioral Testing
  • Attach the FM system and verify functioning
  • BFM/CI55/50
  • Measure SR in noise with the CIFM at 5 SNR
  • BFM/CI55
  • If time permits, measure SR in quiet with the
    CIFM

21
Compare Conditions
Behavioral Testing
  • Compare percent correct scores with and without
    use of the FM System
  • Two most important conditions for comparison are
  • BCI55/50 and BFM/CI55/50
  • Case studies for Two Children Using Nucleus 3G
    Processors and Phonak MLxS Receivers

Stimuli PBK words Presentation levels case 1,
65/60 case 2 55/50
22
Behavioral Results Thibodeau, Schafer, Overson,
Whalen, Sullivan (2005)
Behavioral Testing
  • BCI55/50 45.50 (CI alone)
  • BCIFM55/50 75.25 (CI FM)
  • The average improvement when adding the FM system
    in noise was
  • 29.75
  • BCI55 76.00
  • BCIFM55 75.24
  • The difference between CI alone and CIFM in
    Quiet was minimal.

23
Verification Procedures for the CIFM Interface
Electroacoustic Testing
  • 3) Electroacoustic Testing

24
ELECTROACOUSTIC PROCEDURESto Evaluate FM systems
with Cochlear Implants
  • New Monitoring Earphones provide a convenient way
    to monitor the output of the CI microphone
    relative to that of the FM microphone prior to
    being delivered to the electrode array.
  • Only Nucleus 3G and Sprint Processors allow this
    earphone to be attached AT THE SAME time as the
    FM Receiver

25
Purpose of Electroacoustic Testing with CIs and
FM Systems
Electroacoustic Testing
  • Verify output for input to
  • -CI microphone, and
  • -FM transmitter microphone
  • Determine FM advantage

www.frye.com
26
Electroacoustic Testing
Electroacoustic Testing
  • Acoustic output from a CI monitor earphone is
    used to verify functioning and to measure the FM
    advantage
  • Currently available on Nucleus ESPrit 3G and
    SPrint
  • A modified ASHA procedure is used for testing the
    FM systems electroacoustically

27
Equipment for Electroacoustic Testing
Electroacoustic Testing
  • Speech processor
  • Monitor earphones
  • Hearing aid analyzer Fonix FP40
  • Coupler ½ to 1 inch adaptor OR
  • Adaptor cord from Speech Processor to
    analyzer

28
Equipment for Electroacoustic Testing
Electroacoustic Testing
  • ESPrit 3G One Control either programmed for
    Sensitivity or for Volume
  • Units today are set
  • P1-Sensitivity (Range 1-7)
  • P2-Volume (Range 1-7)
  • SPrint
  • Separate Controls for
  • Volume Middle no. on display (Range 1-9)
  • Sensitivity Right no. on display (Range 1-20)

29
Processor Knob Control
  • Sensitivity
  • The quietest sounds that the speech processor
    will detect from the microphone and convert into
    stimulation
  • Volume
  • Modifies the intensity to the listener of that
    which has already been detected

G
Adapted from Nucleus 24 Technical Bulletin
December 1998-Febuary 1999 / Issue No. 6
30
Equipment for Electroacoustic Testing
Electroacoustic Testing
  • FM Transmitter Phonak Campus S
  • FM Receivers-Set to Double Dots to get FM M
    Adaptor set to FMM

31
Connections for Testing Procedure
Electroacoustic Testing
  • Connect the CI speech processor and the FM
    receiver
  • 2. Plug the monitor earphones into the speech
    processor
  • 3. Connect the ½ to 1 inch adaptor to the test
    microphone or use adaptor cord

32
Connections for Testing Procedure
Electroacoustic Testing
  • 4. Fit one earphone into the coupler or plug into
    analyzer
  • 5. Place the coupler and earphone in a stable
    location outside the analyzer
  • 6. Turn on the processor, receiver, and
    transmitter

33
Measurement Steps
Electroacoustic Testing
  • Part I Input to CI mic
  • Part II Input to FM mic
  • Part III Compare Outputs

34
Part IMeasuring RMS for Input to CI
Electroacoustic Testing
  • 1. Position processor in test box and close lid
  • 2. Present 65 dB SPL complex signal ECI/FM65
  • 3. Place transmitter in quiet location
  • 4. Record RMS for that Setting

35
Part II Measuring RMS for Input to the FM
Transmitter
  • 1. Place transmitter microphone in test
  • box and close lid
  • 2. Present 80 dB SPL complex signal EFM/CI80
  • 3. Place processor in quiet location
  • 4. Record RMS for that Setting

36
Part III Calculate FM Advantage
  • FM Advantage EFM/CI80-ECI/FM65 (RMS Difference)
  • Ideal FM advantage is at least 10 dB
  • If speech processor is set for sensitivity,
    adjust sensitivity knob to improve FM advantage
    if necessary

37
FM Advantage as a Function of Sensitivity Setting
on the 3G
MLxS programmed to 10 and 24 Advantage
via Toasting
Volume programmed to default (100 of
Electrical Dynamic Range, equivalent to 9 on
SPRINT) FM Advantage RMS Difference between
EFM/CI80 and ECI/FM65
38
SUMMARY
  • FM Fittings must be verified in one or more ways
  • Informal Testing
  • Behavioral Testing
  • Electroacoustic Testing

39
SUMMARY
  • Informal Testing
  • Should be part of daily routine when FM is
    connected to CI
  • Students should be reinforced when they alert
    adult that system is not working

40
SUMMARY
  • Behavioral Testing
  • Recall that if using Percent Correct scores,
  • large differences are needed to be
  • significantly different
  • Necessary to verify FM advantage when
  • electroacoustic testing cannot be performed

41
SUMMARY
  • Electroacoustic Testing
  • Can be done for those systems that allow the
    addition of the monitoring earphone while the FM
    is connected
  • Necessary to verify FM advantage

42
SUMMARY
  • Given the risks, costs, and commitment associated
    with obtaining a Cochlear Implant
  • It only makes sense that one would do everything
    possible to provide the most optimal signal.
  • THEREFORE-------------

43
  • CONSIDER FM SYSTEMS FOR EVERY EAR OF EVERY
    CHILD AND
  • VERIFY FM FITTINGS
  • WITH
  • COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
  • SO THAT..
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com