TDC 363 Local Area Networks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

TDC 363 Local Area Networks

Description:

TDC 363 Local Area Networks Metropolitan Area Networks (MAN) MAN Definition Not a precise definition available Somewhere between a LAN and a WAN with some features of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: Cur9150
Category:
Tags: tdc | area | forklift | local | networks

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TDC 363 Local Area Networks


1
TDC 363 Local Area Networks
  • Metropolitan Area Networks (MAN)

2
MAN Definition
  • Not a precise definition available
  • Somewhere between a LAN and a WAN with some
    features of each
  • Serves a geographic area larger than a LAN, such
    as a city or metropolitan region

3
Definition Continued
  • MANs can interconnect various sites for one
    company, or interconnect many companies
  • MANs transfer data at LAN speeds (and higher) but
    often use more complicated protocols

4
MAN Application Areas
  • Interconnection and consolidation of corporate
    data centers
  • Transparent extension of the LAN by
    interconnecting distributed corporate locations
  • Support of SAN (storage area networks)
  • Server-less offices

5
MAN Application Areas
  • Real-time transaction backups
  • High-speed disaster recovery
  • Interconnection between corporate data center and
    ISP
  • Government, business, medicine and education
    high-speed interconnections

6
SANs
  • Latest evolution of mass data storage for large
    corporations and institutions
  • Normally data storage is attached to the LAN via
    a server
  • But with a SAN high-volume disk arrays and tape
    storage occupy a network separate, but connected
    to, a LAN

7
MAN Features
  • Why use a MAN?
  • Very high speeds (Gbps possible)
  • Self-healing networks
  • Bandwidth on demand
  • MANs cover distances that LANs cannot
  • But MANs often provide a lower level of
    complexity than many WANs

8
MAN Topologies
  • Point-to-point
  • Characterized by very high speeds (10 to 40 Gbps)
  • Often DWDM over fiber
  • Redundancy is provided at the card level -
    parallel fiber links with redundant equipment at
    the endpoints

9
MAN Topologies
  • Ring
  • Most common architecture
  • Can span tens of kilometers
  • Data rates range from 622 Mbps to 10 Gbps per
    channel
  • SONET rings a typical example
  • Multiple rings with very fast failover provide
    stability

10
MAN Topologies
  • Mesh
  • The future of MANs?
  • A natural extension of point-to-point MANs
  • Can also connect to established rings
  • High speeds, long distances, good redundancy

11
Support Technologies
  • SONET/SDH
  • ATM
  • Gigabit Ethernet
  • IP
  • Fibre Channel
  • FDDI

12
Support Technology - SONET
  • Currently most MANs are supported by SONET rings
  • SONET is the fundamental transmission technology
    for both TDM-based circuit switched networks, and
    most overlay data networks
  • Unfortunately, SONET has a number of shortcomings

13
Support Technology - SONET
  • SONET disadvantages
  • Still fairly expensive
  • Problems adapting data services to the
    voice-designed and voice-optimized hierarchy
  • Inflexible multiplexing hierarchy (SONET
    increments in terms of DS-0s / DS-1s)
  • SONET cannot be provisioned dynamically

14
Support Technology - ATM
  • Favored by many service providers because it can
    support different protocols and different traffic
    types into a common protocol format for
    transmission over SONET
  • Unfortunately, ATM is complex, costly, and
    provides an extra layer of complexity

15
Support Technology - Gigabit Ethernet
  • A very interesting newcomer to MAN technology
  • A very common and well-understood technology
  • Can scale from 10 Mbps, 100 Mbps, 1000 Mbps, to
    10 Gbps easily
  • Low cost
  • No need for ATM or SONET

16
Support Technology - IP
  • Almost entire data world uses IP
  • Also well known, widely adopted, reasonably
    flexible, relatively simple
  • IP is a layer 3 protocol, so question is IP over
    ATM over SONET? IP over SONET? IP over Ethernet?

17
Support Technology - Fibre Channel
  • Predominant data link technology used in SANs
  • Economical replacement for SCSI
  • Interfaces available at 100 MBps with 200 MBps
    soon and 400 MBps testing
  • Does not have a short distance limitation like
    SCSI
  • Found in point-to-point, mesh, and arbitrated
    loops

18
Support Technology - FDDI
  • Basically a legacy technology
  • Being replaced by Gigabit Ethernet or ATM
  • Can be transparently transported over the optical
    layer using DWDM

19
SONET vs. Gigabit Ethernet
  • Lets examine the two more interesting support
    technologies
  • Why more interesting?
  • SONET is the ruler
  • Gigabit Ethernet is trying to dethrone that ruler

20
SONET vs. Gigabit Ethernet
  • Ethernet is 10 times less expensive than current
    SONET technology
  • Ethernet is a simple and widely understood
    technology
  • Ethernet is the best technology for carrying IP
    traffic - IP and Ethernet have matured together

21
SONET vs. Gigabit Ethernet
  • Optical Ethernet can support links in the network
    range from 3 to 6 miles using single mode 1310
    nm wavelength and up to 43.4 miles for 1550 nm
    wavelength
  • Optical Ethernet can segregate traffic of
    different users and deliver the particular
    service level each user purchases

22
SONET vs. Gigabit Ethernet
  • Traffic segregation is accomplished by using the
    IEEE 802.1pQ VLAN standard
  • With this standard, each users frame is marked
    with a VLAN tag as it enters the network
  • This tag keeps each users traffic separate as it
    crosses the network

23
SONET vs. Gigabit Ethernet
  • Optical Ethernet can also deliver guaranteed
    levels of latency, jitter, and bandwidth
  • To provide these levels of latency and jitter,
    IETF created the Differentiated Services
    (Diff-Serv) project
  • Diff-Serv - as each frame enters a network,
    information from the frame is used to assign it
    to a particular class of service

24
SONET vs. Gigabit Ethernet
  • User contracts also specify bandwidths, which
    network operators guarantee by limiting the
    aggregate of guarantees to network capacity
    (similar to frame relay and ATM)

25
(No Transcript)
26
SONET vs. Gigabit Ethernet
  • One of the big advantages of Gigabit Ethernet
    over SONET is the levels of complexity
  • SONET has multiple layers - the router network
    running over the ATM network running over the
    SONET network running over a collection of
    point-to-point DWDM links

27
SONET vs. Gigabit Ethernet
28
SONET vs. Gigabit Ethernet
  • Gigabit Ethernet, however, does not have all the
    levels, making the technology much simpler and
    much less expensive

29
SONET vs. Gigabit Ethernet
30
Yipesthats fast!
  • 15 months old (as of Fall 2000)
  • Up and running in 20 cities
  • A disruptive approach to networking
  • The first fully managed, all-IP regional optical
    networks using Gigabit Ethernet for linking
    businesses to eadch other and to the Internet

31
Yipesthats fast!
  • Fully scalable bandwidth-on-demand from 1 Mbps up
    to 1 Gbps in 1 Mbps increments
  • Busting the regional bandwidth bottleneck between
    corporate LANs and cross-country fiber networks
    to drive a new generation of bandwidth-intensive
    applications
  • Unprecedented levels of customer control via the
    Yipes Care Service Portal

32
Yipes - Typical Regional Network
  • Diversely sourced dark fiber
  • Concatenated local access loops
  • Less than 10 ms latency regional ring
  • Multiple peering arrangements
  • Several WAN connections
  • 24x7 redundant monitoring

33
Yipes - Extending the LANExperience
  • Fiber to business locations
  • Familiar computing environment
  • Granular bandwidth increments - 1 Mbps to 1 Gbps
    in 1 Mbps increments
  • Scalability on demand - no forklift upgrade -
    upgrade with a phone call, and soon with via a
    Web site

34
Yipes - QoS
  • Traffic engineering
  • know bandwidth at access points and in metro
    network for all customers
  • no over subscribing
  • IEEE standard (802.1pQ) for VLANs
  • identify customer packets with different tags
  • prioritize packets

35
Yipes - QoS
  • Hardware
  • equipment has separate queues and can prioritize
    frames
  • Can prioritize at IP layer
  • Based on IETFs Diff-Serv

36
Yipes - Security, Survivability and Reliability
  • Security
  • Layer 2 switching using VLAN tags based on IEEE
    802.1q/p
  • Survivability
  • Dual fiber entrance to customer premises
  • Failover
  • 2-3 seconds for layer 3 routing
  • 30 - 40 seconds for layer 2 bridging/switching (5
    seconds in future)
  • Reliability
  • 99.99 migrating to 99.999 by mid 2001

37
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com