MEMO Minimizing Error, Maximizing Outcome The Physician Worklife Study II - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

MEMO Minimizing Error, Maximizing Outcome The Physician Worklife Study II

Description:

MEMO Minimizing Error, Maximizing Outcome The Physician Worklife Study II Mark Linzer, UW, Principal Investigator Mark Schwartz, NYU, Co-PI Linda Baier Manwell, UW ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:111
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: LindaM58
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MEMO Minimizing Error, Maximizing Outcome The Physician Worklife Study II


1
MEMO Minimizing Error, Maximizing Outcome The
Physician Worklife Study II
  • Mark Linzer, UW, Principal Investigator
  • Mark Schwartz, NYU, Co-PI
  • Linda Baier Manwell, UW, Project Director

2
Learning Objectives
  • To better understand how the work environment
    affects physicians and patients
  • To learn more about the MEMO project
  • To see how gender, race, and ethnicity interact
    with working conditions
  • To realize the impact of a hectic or chaotic work
    environment

3
Background
  • Physician Worklife Study I (PWS)
  • Funded by Robt Wood Johnson Found, 1995-1998
  • National, random sample of 5,704 MDs
  • Stratified by five specialties
  • Findings
  • Time pressure is major source of
    stress/dissatisfaction
  • Stress and dissatisfaction predict burnout and
    intent to leave
  • Work control is powerful predictor of
    satisfaction
  • Burnout is 60 higher in women MDs

4
What is MEMO?
  • Funded by AHRQ, 2001-2005
  • Effect of primary care working conditions on MDs
    and quality of care
  • Funded by Robt Wood Johnson, 2005-2006
  • Effect of workplace on health care disparities
  • 101 clinics in Chicago, Madison, Milwaukee, New
    York City, rural/small town Wisconsin
  • 420 MDs, 1785 patients

5
MEMO Conceptual Model
6
MEMO Data Collection Points
7
Measuring Quality
8
Determining Errors
  • Clinicians reported errors in disease management
    during past year
  • Clinicians rated their stress predicted
    likelihood of making future errors on the OSPRE
    (Occupational Stress and PReventable Error)
    instrument
  • Researchers performed confidential chart reviews

9
Physician Participants
  • 420 primary care physicians (85.2 of target 500)
  • 59.2 of those surveyed responded
  • 51 GIM 49 FP
  • 44 female
  • 83 white
  • 83 full-time
  • Age 44 (range 29-89)

10
MEMO Results Measures
Organizational Culture Domains alpha
Quality emphasis (.86) Leadership/governance (.
86) Organizational trust (.79) Information/commu
nic. (.68) Cohesiveness (.66) Stress
Scale alpha (.84) Feel stress due to to
job Few stressors at work Job is extremely
stressful Almost never stressed at work
Prediction of Preventable Error (OSPRE)
alpha (.85) High BPs missed dx of
HTN No depression screen w/sympts No ACE for
diabetic No aspirin for diabetes w/CAD Missed
drug-drug interaction No diabetic eye exam
referral No alcohol screen for HTN
11
MEMO Results MD Outcomes
  • Of 420 physicians...
  • 79 highly satisfied with their jobs
  • 61 said jobs were stressful
  • 53 need more time for physical exams
  • 27 burning out or burned out
  • 31 moderately or more likely to leave job within
    2 years

12
MEMO Results Organizational Culture
  • Predict job satisfaction
  • Work control (.001)
  • Trust in the organization (.001)
  • Resource availability (.001)
  • Less clinic chaos (.001)
  • Predict poorer MD mental health
  • Fewer resources (.001)
  • Less work control (.006)
  • More clinic chaos (.001)
  • Predict future error
  • Less clinic emphasis on information (.017)
  • Less clinic emphasis on diversity (.001)
  • Predict intent to leave
  • Less trust in the organization (.001)
  • Fewer resources (.001)

13
MEMO Results Chaos in the Clinic
  • Describe the atmosphere in your office

Calm Busy, but Hectic,
reasonable chaotic 1
2 3 4 5
  • Chaos ratings similar between MDs and their
    clinic managers (r0.30, plt.001)
  • 46 of MEMO physicians rated their practices as
    chaotic (4 or 5)

14
MEMO Results Chaos in the Clinic
  • Chaotic offices are associated with
  • More minority patients
  • More patients with public or no insurance
  • Fewer exam rooms
  • Fewer staff
  • Less practice emphasis on communication
  • Less practice emphasis on information technology

15
Impact of Chaos on MDs
16
MEMO Results Organizational Culture
  • Perceived Leadership Integrity Index (PLII)
  • Attitudes of organizational leaders to (e.g.)
  • physicians core values
  • controlling costs vs. quality
  • Negative perceptions about perceived integrity
    correlated with physician stress, burnout, and
    intent to leave the practice

17
MEMO Results Gender Differences
18
Background
  • The 1995-98 Physician Worklife Study found
  • Women MDs have more
  • female patients
  • complex patients
  • managed care, uninsured, and Medicaid patients
  • Women MDs have less work control
  • All MDs need more time than allotted to see
    patients, but women need a greater percentage
  • Burnout was 60 higher in women physicians

19
MEMO Results Gender Differences
Workplace characteristics Women MDs Men MDs p-value
Job control (1none, 4great) 2.35 2.69 lt.001
Trust in the organization (1none, 4great) 2.47 2.69 lt.001
Values aligned w/organization (1no, 4great) 1.97 2.39 lt.001
20
MEMO Results Gender Differences
Physician characteristics Women MDs Men MDs p-value
Stress (1low, 5high) 3.45 3.23 lt.003
Burnout (1none, 5completely) 2.32 2.07 lt.001
21
MEMO Results Gender Differences
  • Despite widespread dissemination of similar data,
    assessments of organizational climate and
    worklife by women MDs continue to be lower
    compared to males, and in many areas have
    worsened.
  • Non-alignment of values may explain lower
    perceptions of work control and higher levels of
    stress and burnout among women MDs.
  • Women MDs and their patients remain at higher
    risk for the effects of stress and poor working
    climates.

22
MEMO Results Effect of the Workplace on
Healthcare Disparities
23
Minority Practices
24
MEMO Results Disparities
CLINIC VARIABLES Minority clinics Non-minority clinics
Minority MDs 39 12 plt.001
Adequate access to supplies, equipment, referral specialists 42 70 plt.001
Exam rooms per MD 2.1 2.7 plt.001
Staffing ratio RNLPNMA MDDOPANP 0.9 1.2 p.018
25
MEMO Results Disparities
MD VARIABLES Minority clinics Non-minority clinics
Feel time pressure 57 39 plt.001
Burning or burned out 32 23 p.030
Clinic atmosphere (1calm, 5chaotic) 3.8 3.2 plt.001
Amount of work control (1none, 4great) 2.3 2.7 plt.001
26
MEMO Results Disparities
PATIENT VARIABLES Minority clinics Non-minority clinics
Average number of medications per patient 2.7 2.1 p.003
Uninsured and Medicaid patients 58 19 plt.001
Patient satisfaction with care (1very, 5not at all) 1.44 1.40 p.423
Patient trust in the physician (1 not at all, 5complete) 4.54 4.47 p.373
27
MEMO Results Disparities
  • Clinics that serve many minority patients have
    difficult working conditions that pose a special
    challenge to our health care system.
  • Improvements may be achieved if remediable
    factors are addressed at the organization,
    system, and policy levels.

28
MEMO Current Activities
  • Patient outcomes (n1785, ave 4/MD)
  • Focus groups in minority clinics to identify
    factors that create barriers to quality care and
    exacerbate disparities
  • Focus groups in high quality clinics to identify
    factors/processes that facilitate quality care
    and minimize disparities.
  • Development of Office and Work Life (OWL) tool

29
(No Transcript)
30
Next Steps for MEMO
  • Analyses
  • Patient outcomes
  • Regression analyses
  • Research Practice Redesign
  • Preventing burnout
  • Ameliorating chaos
  • Improving work control
  • Facilitating communication (language, literacy)

31
Modifiable Factors
  • Find ways to better manage resources to reduce
    disparities and improve physician and patient
    health.
  • Assess methods to reduce clinic chaos.
  • Study practices that accomplish a lot with few
    resources. Develop a tool kit for other
    practices to use.

32
Upcoming MEMO Papers
  • MEMO main results paper!
  • Impact of the work environment on care quality
    and errors
  • Other upcoming papers
  • Errors in primary care prediction relationship
    to quality
  • Role of physician gender in quality errors
  • Effect of physician burnout on quality errors
  • Managing an ambulatory practice lessons from
    MEMO
  • Separate but unequal where minority and
    non-minority patients receive primary care

33
MEMO Limitations
  • Only primary care practices enrolled
  • Only 5 regions included (NYC and upper Midwest)
  • Self-reported data

34
MEMO Team
  • Consultants
  • Eric Williams
  • Bob Konrad
  • Elianne Riska
  • Bill Scheckler
  • Stewart Babbott
  • JudyAnn Bigby
  • Peggy Leatt
  • Said Ibrahim
  • Jacqueline Wiltshire
  • MEMO Staff
  • Jim Bobula
  • Marlon Mundt
  • Roger Brown
  • Carolyn Egan
  • Chicago Region
  • Anita Varkey
  • Bernice Man
  • Elizabeth Arce
  • Milwaukee Region
  • Ann Maguire
  • Barb Horner-Ibler
  • Laura Paluch
  • Rural/Small Town WI
  • Mary Beth Plane
  • John Frey
  • Jessica Grettie
  • Mary Lamon-Smith
  • Madison Region
  • Julia McMurray
  • Jessica Sherrieb
  • James Gesicki
  • New York Region
  • Mark Schwartz
  • Joe Rabatin
  • Karla Felix
  • Debby Dowell
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com