Which Research-Supported Practices Best Address the Social and Emotional Differences in Gifted Children? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Which Research-Supported Practices Best Address the Social and Emotional Differences in Gifted Children?

Description:

Which Research-Supported Practices Best Address the Social and Emotional Differences in Gifted Children? Karen B. Rogers, Ph.D. Gifted Education Research, Resource ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:207
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: CCS355
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Which Research-Supported Practices Best Address the Social and Emotional Differences in Gifted Children?


1
Which Research-Supported Practices Best Address
the Social and Emotional Differences in Gifted
Children?
  • Karen B. Rogers, Ph.D.
  • Gifted Education Research, Resource Information
    Centre
  • University of New South Wales
  • Sydney, Australia
  • k.rogers_at_unsw.edu.au

2
First Things First
  • Are there social and emotional differences in
    these children?
  • YES but there are many myths about these
    differences as well

3
Myths About the Gifted
  • They have no practical knowledge, common sense
  • They have a hard time socializing
  • All theyre interested in is memorizing facts and
    details on a specific topic
  • They could be normal if they tried to be BUT
  • They are more likely to suffer from depression,
    psychological disorders, and thoughts of suicide
  • They are difficult to raise
  • Their parents push them so that explains why they
    are so far ahead - this also puts loads of stress
    on them to achieve even when they dont want to

4
Reality One Common Sense
  • Jorgen on planning his own schooling
  • Brett on planning his own schooling
  • Sarina on planning her own schooling
  • Theresa on planning her own schooling
  • GDC Sample A significant percentage of the
    parents of those children described the practical
    problem solving skills of their children.

5
Reality One As a Part of Common Sense
  • They show a preference for competitive games,
    situations
  • Attempt to be socially acceptable requires a
    compromise that many gifted children are
    unwilling to offer, so they become loners,
    competing against themselves (Gross)
  • They strive very hard to be independent
  • Intense drive in gifted individuals, but not
    necessarily accompanied by skills to act
    appropriately (Delisle)
  • Tend to be nonconformist in thought and action
    (Silverman, Albert, Roeper)
  • Their asynchrony pushes them to find other
    answers
  • Discrepancies between cognitive developmental
    level and physical, social, emotional development
    may cause internal conflicts (Silverman,
    Morelock)
  • They produce McGyver-like solutions to everyday
    events
  • They may take inordinate amounts of time, at
    times, to come up with what should be a simple
    solution or behavior

6
Reality Two Social Difficulties
  • Sarah, Ellie, Samantha, Natalie have large groups
    of friends at school, love school, and get along
    well with most teachers. Among my sample only 1
    girl in 10 has any social or school
    difficulties.
  • Andrew, Ryan, Michael, David do not have many
    friends at school, and in fact are hazed or
    bullied by other boys. Approximately 1 boy in 2
    has social or school difficulties
  • GDC Sample Parents (85) reported these children
    as having very good relations with older
    children, all small groups, and good/very good
    relations with same aged peers.

7
Reality Two Socializing May Be in the Eye of the
Beholder
  • Need for solitude
  • Time alone is needed to regroup thoughts and
    perceptions to avoid stress (Webb, Silverman)
  • Tend to more likely be introverted than
    extraverted (Silverman, Webb)
  • Conflict between social and achievement needs
  • Much of the emotional trauma of gifted
    individuals arises from the conflict between
    psycho-social needs for intimacy and achievement
    (Gross)
  • Tedium and repetition in learning lead to
    frustration, anxiety, less wilingness to
    cooperate with others (Czikszentmihalyi, Hoekman)
  • Their sensitivity to peoples ideas, emotions, to
    events (Overexcitabilies) can make for additional
    socialization issues (Piechowski, Dabrowski,
    Lind)

8
Reality Two Socializing May Be in the Eye of the
Beholder
  • Level of psychosocial development is more highly
    correlated with mental age than with
    chronological age
  • Ability to think abstractly and reason
    conceptually leads to advanced development in
    social, emotional, and moral reasoning domains
    (Tannenbaum, Janos Robinson, Karnes)
  • Need for intimacy, special interactive
    relationships
  • Important component for development of potential
    (Silverman) and life satisfaction (Sears)
  • Individuals seek their like (other gifted
    youngsters or older-aged children) for such
    relationships (Schunk, Hollingworth, OShea)
  • When not with intellectual peers, social
    self-concept declines, and negative
    self-criticism increases (Foster, Gross)
  • Gifted are often looking for a different kind of
    friendship -- the sure shelter rather than a
    kid to hang out with (Gross)

9
Reality Three Facts and Details
  • Sarah Nursing Home songs
  • Natalie Writing contests
  • Michael Graphing equations
  • Ryan Lego constructions
  • My sample Two of every three children have a
    long standing interest in something that involves
    the learning of intricate facts and details, but
    most of these children do something with their
    learning maps, stories, plays, etc.

10
Reality Three Is There Something Wrong With
Lopsidedness?
  • It may be an intense need to be recognized that
    impels them toward single focused pursuits
  • Wish to be viewed as good at their area of
    expertise and to gain recognition for excellent
    work in that area --need to master content area
    (Coleman, Borland)
  • Possess entelechy (single minded motivation to
    pursue own goals, be best they can be) (Lovecky)
  • Or it may be their innate drive to excel that
    pushes them forward
  • Inborn trait (Galton) OR product of enriched home
    environment (Bloom) OR evolved developmental
    characteristic (Dabrowski)
  • May lead to perfectionism if external pressures
    are applied (Whitmore), if tasks given are too
    easy (Hoekman), or if individual is
    ego-involved, rather than task-involved (Dweck,
    Gross)
  • Is present in individuals with positive
    self-concept, inner locus of control (Foster)

11
Reality Four Abnormal Responses to Normal Events
are Rare
  • Less than 2 of the GDC Sample had issues with
    depression, trauma, night terrors, thoughts of
    suicide, despite the fact that the center is a
    counseling center for gifted children.
  • My sample -- no incidences of emotional disorders
    that require psychological counseling. About 1 in
    15 needs organizational skills training/counseling
    or help with underachievement issues. Several
    have had to deal with the effects of hazing or
    bullying, but without lasting psychological
    damage at this point.
  • Yet research has suggested they show the same
    amount of interest and enjoyment at school as
    others (Gentry et al), experience fewer
    life-changing events which could cause stress
    (Metha), and their emotional adjustment scores
    are in the normative range (Zigler)

12
Reality Four Even So, Abnormal Responses Can
Happen
  • Gifted children may be at risk for
    internalizing disorders (Robinson et al)
  • When forced into isolation and loneliness by the
    rejection of peers, this can lead to depression
    and anxiety reactions (Jackson)
  • Overt pressure by teachers and parents to achieve
    can lead to fear of failure and dysfunctional
    perfectionism (Weisse)
  • Intensities, sensitivities and emotionality can
    lead to anxiety, phobias, and interpersonal
    problems (Fiedler)
  • But they appear to be less at risk for
    externalizing disorders (Fiedler)
  • Are less physically aggressive, less restless,
    more respectful (Ludwig et al)
  • Research suggests they are no more likely to be
    referred for discipline problems that other
    students (Brody Benbow)
  • Tend to be no different in adolescence from their
    age peer in feeling different, being bored or
    being perfectionistic (Ford, Baker), perhaps
    because they have greater resilience (Bland et
    al), coping strategies, (Tomchin et al) and
    self-efficacy (Merrill et al) which buffer
    tendencies toward acting out, oppositional-defiant
    behavior, conduct disorder, or violence
    (Neihart).

13
Reality Five Difficult to Raise
  • GDC sample 20 of the parents reported their
    children as difficult to raise, which means 80
    were sometimes difficult or easy.
  • My sample None of the parents have reported
    their children as difficult although there are
    reports of a difficulty here or there, usually
    involving others tolerating their own child. Two
    children were reported as beginning to act out
    at school because of their treatment there, but
    at home issues are fairly mild.
  • Again, is difficulty to raise in the eye of the
    beholder and reflect just as strongly on
    parenting style as on something internal that
    might be connected with being gifted?

14
Reality Six Parents are Pushers
  • Among my sample, I had two parents (out of 250)
    who tended to push their children, but
    certainly not beyond what the child is capable of
    accomplishing. Neither of these children is
    unhappy with themselves or with their parents.
    The remainder of the parents tended to break
    down when they found out they had a gifted
    child, more out of panic that ego tripping.
  • In a follow up of the parents of my 250 children
    who were given IEPs to take to the schools, fewer
    than 20 did take the plans or advocated beyond a
    single discussion with the school. Parents were
    more often likely to change schools or home
    school than to advocate strongly for change even
    with the evidence in front of them!
  • Grost is probably representative of how parents
    of gifted children relate to their children.
    These parents dont push, they marshal resources
    as their children indicate willingness or
    interest.

15
Second Things Second
  • What can educators do to address the social and
    emotional issues that crop up for these learners
    as a result of their giftedness?

16
When the Curriculum is not Challenging...
  • Frustration and anxiety
  • Perfectionism
  • Lowered academic self-concept
  • Underachievement or Non-production

17
When Not Allowed to Work With Others of Like
Ability ...
  • Lack of psycho-social intimacy
  • Unrealistic academic self-concept
  • Lower social self-concept, self-worth
  • Increased self-criticism
  • Alienation

18
When There is No Perceived Progress in Learning...
  • Decline in social, emotional, and moral
    development
  • Existential depression
  • Frustration, stress
  • Non-production, underachievement

19
When the Work is Too Slow and Repetitive...
  • Loss of motivation, willingness to concentrate
  • Sloppiness, lack of caring about performance or
    product
  • Dislike of learning and school
  • Acting out, behavior disruptions

20
Educational Applications of the Social
Emotional Research and Giftedness
  • Appropriately challenging curriculum
  • Placement with others of like ability when the
    learning is serious and in-depth
  • Exposure to progressively more complex tasks in a
    pre-structured continuum of learning experiences
    based on mastery and readiness
  • Flexible progression at appropriately rapid pace
    (accelerative component)
  • Placement in a like ability social group to deal
    with social and affective issues that crop up in
    their lives (use of bibliotherapy, small group
    projects, discussion, etc.)

21
Last Words...
  • Its a daunting task, being an educator, bearing
    the responsibility for shaping both academics and
    attitudes No computer-scanned bubble sheet
    measures how our students feel about learning or
    their biases toward self and others. These
    indexes, the true value of learning and
    education, elude detection and measurement,
    sometimes for yearsSo, the brave educator
    wishing to enhance both students self-concepts
    and their achievements must be content with not
    knowing the immediate or long-term impacts of
    their actions.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com