Title: Impact of Government Policies and Investment Agreements on FDI Inflows to Developing Countries: Empirical Evidence
1Impact of Government Policies andInvestment
Agreements on FDI Inflows to Developing
Countries Empirical Evidence
- Rashmi Banga
- Associate Professor
- Indian Council for Research on International
Economic Relations Jesus and Mary College, - Delhi University, India
2Motivation of the Study
- Changing Attitudes of the Developing Countries
toward Inward FDI. - Increase in Competition for FDI Inflows.
- FDI Incentives Removal of Restrictions
Bilateral and Regional Investment Agreements. - Prof. Amartya Sens Third R, Reason Why are
we doing what we are doing?
3Changing Pattern of FDI Inflows(Source World
Investment Directory)
4 Composition of FDI Source World
Investment Directory(1986-87to1996-97)
5Number of Bilateral Investment Treaties Source
UNCTAD
6Number of BITs Signed with Developed and
Developing Countries in 1999-2000
7Questions Asked by the Study
- How important are Economic Fundamentals in
attracting FDI Inflows in the integrated world
economy? - How successful are Selective Government Policies
that aim at Inward FDI? - Do International Investment Agreements Matter?
- Do FDI from Developed Countries and Developing
Countries Differ respond differently to Economic
Fundamentals, Government Policies and Investment
Agreements?
8Earlier Research on Determinants of Inward FDI
- Economic Fundamentals Dunnings OLI Paradigm
(Root and Ahmed 1979, Schneider and Frey 1985,
Bhattacharya et al 1996, Bende Nende, et al 2000,
Trevino, et al 2002) - Government Policies Impact of Taxes, Tariffs,
Investment Incentives and Restrictions using time
series or cross-section data.(Grubert and Mutti
1991, Loree and Guisinger 1995, Taylor 2000,
Dunning 2002, Blomstrom and Kokko 2002 and Kumar
2002)
9Contributions to the Literature
- The Study estimates the Impact of International
Investment Agreements on FDI Inflows. - It also estimates the Determinants of FDI from
Developed and Developing Countries and their
response to Government Policies and Investment
Agreements. - It uses Panel data analysis to estimate the
Impact of Government Policies. A score between
0-2 is allocated to each country in each year.
10Model Estimated
- FDIit f (Economic Fundamental)it-1, (Tariff
Policies) it ,(FDI Incentives)it , (Removal of
Restrictions on FDI)it , (Bilateral Investment
Agreements)dgct, (Bilateral Investment
Agreements)dct, (Regional Investment Agreements)
it - where i stands for country and t stands for the
time period 1980-81, 1981-82..1999-2000
11Methodology Adopted
- Panel Data for Fifteen developing countries in
South, East and South East Asia for the period
1980-81 to 1999-2000. (Bangladesh, China, China-
Hong Kong, India, Korea, Malaysia, Nepal,
Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka,
China-Taiwan, Indonesia, Thailand and Viet Nam) - Panel data for Ten developing countries for the
period 1986-1987 to 1996-1997 uses FDI Approvals. - Random Effects and Fixed Effects Models are
estimated.
12Data Sources
- World Investment Directory (UNCTAD) Economic and
Social Survey of Asia and the Pacific, United
Nations (various issues), Asian Development
Outlook and Country Economic Review, Asian
Development Bank (various issues) and Country
Reports on Economic Policy and Trade Practice,
released by the Bureau of Economic and Business
Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
13Economic Fundamentals
14Government Policies
- Investment Incentives
- Tax Holidays
- Tax Concessions in number of industries
- Repatriation of Profits and Dividends.
- Tariff Policies Average Tariff Rates.
- Removal of Restrictions
- Access to Industries
- Foreign Ownership Restrictions
- Ease of Entry
- Performance Requirements
- Corporate Profits Tax Rate
15Bilateral and Regional Investment Treaties
- Bilateral Investment Treaties
- Specific Standards of Investment Protection and
Settlement of Disputes - Fair and Equitable Treatment.
- National Treatment.
- Most favoured Nation Treatment.
- Regional Investment Agreements
- APEC Countries Non-Binding Investment Principles
(NBIP) in 1994. - ASEAN Countries ASEAN Investment Area (AIA) in
1999
16Empirical Results Determinants of Aggregate FDI
17(No Transcript)
18Results Economic Fundamentals Government
Policies
- Large Market Size Low Efficiency Wages High
Skill Levels Low External Debt and Large Extent
of Electricity Consumed. - After controlling for Economic Fundamentals
Government Incentives are not found to have a
significant impact. - But Removal of Restrictions have a significant
positive impact. - Low Tariff Rates have a significant positive
impact.
19Results Investment Agreements
- An interesting finding is that the number of BITs
signed have a significant positive impact on FDI
inflows. - But it is number of BITs signed with Developed
Countries that are significant. - Number of BITs signed with developing countries
do not have a significant impact. - While NBIP (APEC) is a significant determinant,
AIA (ASEAN) does not have a significant impact.
20Empirical Results Determinants of FDI from
Developed and Developing Countries
21(No Transcript)
22Determinants of FDI from Developed and Developing
Countries
- FDI From Developed Countries are attracted to
Large Market Size, Higher Education Levels,
Better Financial Health, Greater Transport and
Communication and Lower Domestic Lending Rates
Removal of RestrictionsBITs. - FDI From Developing Countries are attracted to
Large Market Size, Potential Markets, Low Labour
Cost, Undervalued Exchange Rates, Transport and
Communication and Lower Lending Rates Lower
Tariff Rates FDI Incentives.
23Conclusions
- Along with Economic Fundamentals, Government
policies play an important role in attracting FDI
into Developing Countries, especially removal of
restrictions. - International Investment Agreements, especially
Bilateral can form important policy instruments
in attracting FDI from Developed Countries. - FDI from Developed and Developing Countries
respond differently to Economic Fundamentals,
Government Policies and Investment Agreements.
24(No Transcript)