Chiral Tunneling and the Klein Paradox in Graphene M.I. Katsnelson, K.S. Novoselov, and A.K. Geim Nature Physics Volume 2 September 2006 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Chiral Tunneling and the Klein Paradox in Graphene M.I. Katsnelson, K.S. Novoselov, and A.K. Geim Nature Physics Volume 2 September 2006

Description:

Chiral Tunneling and the Klein Paradox in Graphene M.I. Katsnelson, K.S. Novoselov, and A.K. Geim Nature Physics Volume 2 September 2006 John Watson – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:196
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: JohnWa155
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chiral Tunneling and the Klein Paradox in Graphene M.I. Katsnelson, K.S. Novoselov, and A.K. Geim Nature Physics Volume 2 September 2006


1
Chiral Tunneling and the Klein Paradox in
GrapheneM.I. Katsnelson, K.S. Novoselov, and
A.K. GeimNature Physics Volume 2 September 2006
  • John Watson

2
Outline
  • Background, main result
  • Details of paper
  • Authors proposed future work
  • Reported experimental observations
  • Summary

3
Background
  • Klein paradox implied by Diracs relativistic
    quantum mechanics
  • Consider potential step on right
  • Relativistic QM gives
  • Dont get non-relativistic exponential decay

Calogeracos, A. Dombey, N.. Contemporary
Physics, Sep/Oct99, Vol. 40 Issue 5
4
Main result
  • Graphene can be used to study relativistic QM
    with physically realizable experiments
  • Differences between single- and bi-layer graphene
    reveal underlying mechanism behind Klein
    tunneling chirality

5
Brief review of Dirac physics
6
Graphene and Dirac
  • Linear dispersion simplifies Hamiltonian
  • Electrons in graphene like photons in Dirac QM
  • Pseudospin refers to crystal sublattice
  • Electrons/holes exhibit charge-conjugation
    symmetry

7
Solution to Dirac Equation
Right Transmission probability through 100 nm
wide barrier as a function of incident angle for
electrons with E 80 meV.
V0 200 meV V0 285 meV
8
Bilayer Graphene
  • No longer massless fermions
  • Still chiral
  • Four solutions
  • Propagating and evanescent

9
Klein paradox in bilayer graphene
  • Electrons still chiral, so why the different
    result?
  • Electrons behave as if having spin 1
  • Scattered into evanescent wave

V0 50 meV V0 100 meV
Right Transmission probability through 100 nm
wide barrier as a function of incident angle for
electrons with E 17 meV.
10
Conclusion on mechanism for Klein tunneling
Tunneling amplitude as function of barrier
thickness
  • Different pseudospins key
  • Single layer graphene chiral, behave like spin ½
  • Bilayer graphene chiral, behave like spin 1
  • Conventional no chirality

Red single layer graphene Blue bilayer
graphene Green Non-chiral, zero-gap semiconductor
11
Predicted experimental implications
  • Localization suppression
  • Possibly responsible for observed minimal
    conductivity
  • Reduced impurity scattering

Diffusive conductor thought experiment with
arbitrary impurity distribution
12
Proposed experiment
  • Use field effect to modulate carrier
    concentration
  • Measure voltage drop to observe transmission

Dark purple gated regions Orange voltage
probes Light purple graphene
13
Graphene Heterojunctions
  • Used interference to determine magnitude and
    phase of T and R
  • Resistance measurements not as useful
  • Used narrow gates to limit diffusive transport

Young, A.F. and Kim, P. Quantum interference and
Klein tunneling in graphene heterojunctions.
arXiv 0808.0855v3. 2008.
14
Fabry-Perot Etalon
  • Collimation still expected
  • Oscillating component of conductance expected
  • Add B field

15
Conductance
16
Observed and theoretical phase shifts
17
Summary
  • Katsnelson et al.
  • Klein tunneling possible in graphene due to
    required conservation of pseudospin
  • Single layer graphene has T 1 at normal
    incidence by electron wave coupling to hole wave
  • Bilayer graphene has T 0 at normal incidence by
    electron coupling to evanescent hole wave
  • Suggests resistance measurements to observe

18
Summary
  • Young et al.
  • Resistance measurements no good need phase
    information
  • Observe phase shift in conductance to find T 1

19
Additional References
  • Calogeracos, A. and Dombey, N. History and
    Physics of the Klein paradox. Contemporary
    Physics 40,313-321 (1999)
  • Slonczewski, J.C. and Weiss, P.R. Band Structure
    of Graphite. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 272 (1958).
  • Semenoff, Gordon. Condensed-Matter Simulation of
    a Three-Dimensional Anomaly. Phys. Rev. Lett.
    53, 2449 (1984).
  • Haldane, F.D.M. Model for a Quantum Hall Effect
    without Landau Levels Condensed-Matter
    Realization of a Parity Anomaly. Phys. Rev.
    Lett. 2015 (1988).
  • Novselov, K.S. et al. Unconventional quantum
    Hall effect and Berrys phase of 2p in bilayer
    graphene. Nature Physics 2, 177 (2006)
  • McCann, E. and Falko, V. Landau Level
    Degeneracy and Quantum Hall Effect in a Graphite
    Bilayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 086805 (2006)
  • Sakurai, J.J. Advanced Quantum Mechanics.
    Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. Redwood
    City, CA. 1984.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com