Title: Controlled Clinical Trials: Practical Knowledge You Can Use in Your Practice
1Controlled Clinical Trials Practical Knowledge
You Can Use in Your Practice
- Kyle Cheatham, O.D., F.A.A.O
- Heartland Eye Consultants
- FCO Conference, November 5, 2010
2Disclosures
- The content of this COPE Accredited CE activity
was prepared independently without input from
members of the ophthalmic community. - I have no direct financial or proprietary
interest in any companies, products or services
mentioned in this presentation. - The content and format of this course is
presented without commercial bias and does not
claim superiority of any commercial product or
service.
3Relative Risk Reduction (RRR)
- Untreated Treated RRR
- 90/100 45/100
50 - 40/1000 20/1000 50
- 2/1,000,000 1/1,000,000 50
4Absolute Risk Reduction
- Untreated Treated RRR ARR
- 90/100 45/100 50
45/100 -
- 40/1000 20/1000 50
20/1000 - 2/1,000,000 1/1,000,000 50
1/Million
5Number Needed to Treat (NTT)
- ARR NTT
- 45/100 1/.45
1.5 -
- 20/1000 1/.02 50
- 1/1,000,000 1/Huge gt 1,000,000
6Statistics
- There are 3 Kind of Lies
- Lies, Darn Lies Statistics
-
- Mark Twain
7Ocular Hypertension Treatment Trial
- Main Question.
- Does lowering IOP in patients with Ocular
Hypertension reduce the risk of development of
glaucoma?
8Ocular Hypertension Treatment Trial
- Answer YES
- After 5 years
- Untreated Treated
RRR - 9.5 4.4
50 - Number Needed To Treat (NTT ).
- 1 / ARR 20
9Thoughts on the OHTT
- Remember, 90 of patients will NOT go on to
develop EARLY glaucoma over 5 years. - Recall the endpoint in this study.
- Saying 5 benefit is possibly an overstatement
of how much we help these patients.
10Glaucoma Philosophy
- "We constantly have to remind ourselves of what
business we're in. We are not in the business of
lowering intraocular pressure. We are not in the
business of preventing further disc damage. We
are not in the business of stopping visual field
defects. We are in the business of keeping a
patient functioning visually at a level that
doesn't hamper or impede the highest quality of
life possible. In addition, we should accomplish
the above in the most effective and economical
manner." - Zimmerman, Thon, Journal of Glaucoma 1996 5 299
11QUESTIONS?....
12Diabetes What matters to us?
- What are the two threats to vision?
- Proliferative and Macular Disease
- Proliferative Preretinal/Vitreous Hemorrhage,
NVG, Retinal Detachment - Macular Disease Ischemia and Edema
- Which of these can you treat..
13Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS)
- Question How effective is PRP in patients with
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy?
14DRS Results
-
- -Patients with PDR and HRCs
- 26 of untreated reached endpoint
- 11 of treated reached endpoint
- 15 ARR / NTT 7
- -Patients with PDR and no HRCs
- 7 vs. 3 (4 ARR) / NTT 25
15Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)
- Three Goals PRP, Macular Edema, Aspirin
16ETDRS
- How effective is PRP in patients with Severe
NPDR? - Answer PRP NOT effective in NPDR
- 3.7 of Untreated Patients had VA lt 5/200
- 2.6 of Treated Patients had VA lt 5/200
- ARR 1.1 / RRR 30 / NTT 91
17Results of ETDRS
- How effective is photocoagulation in preventing
vision loss (lt3 lines) in CSME? - PHOTOCOAGULATION FOR CSME.
- At 3 Years
- 33 Untreated Pts lost 3 or more lines of
VA - 13 Treated Pts lost 3 or more lines of
VA - ARR 20 / NTT 5
18ETDRS
- Does aspirin have any harmful or beneficial
effects in patients with Diabetic Retinopathy? - Aspirin does not alter the progression of
- diabetic retinopathy. It did not increase
- vitreous/preretinal hemorrhages.
19Summary of DM.
- Which threats to vision in DM are treatable?
- How does this evidence impact the way we manage
our diabetics?
20(No Transcript)
21BRVOs... What matters to us?
- What are the Threats to Vision?
- 1. MACULAR Edema, Ischemia, Intraretinal
hemorrhage. - 2. PROLIFERATIVE Preretinal/Vitreous
Hemorrhage.
22BRANCHED RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION STUDY (BVOS)
- THREE MAIN QUESTIONS
- Can PRP prevent neovascularization after a BRVO?
- Can PRP prevent vitreous hemorrhage after a BRVO?
- Can grid laser photocoagulation of the macula
improve VA in patients with macular edema whose
VA is 20/40 or worse.
23BVOS
- Group One 319 total eyes / Patients had
- NO current neovascularization
-
- Untreated 35/159 (22) developed
neovascularization. -
- Treated 19/160 (12) developed
neovascularization
24BVOS
- 82 total eyes / Patients had Neovascularization
-
- Untreated 25/41 (61) developed vitreous
hemorrhage - Treated 12/41 (29) developed vitreous
hemorrhage - ARR 32 so NTT 3
25BVOS
- Should we refer for PRP right away, or can we
wait for neovascularization before referring for
PRP? - (12) X (29) 3.5 get a V-heme if treated
with PRP right away. - (22) X (29) 6.4 get a V-heme if treated
with PRP only after presence of - neovascularization.
26Macular Edema from BRVO.
-
- 139 total eyes / Patients had macular edema with
20/40 vision or worse and were 3 months past
onset of BRVO. - Control 37 improved 2 or more lines of VA at 3
yrs - Treated 65 improved 2 or more lines of VA at
3 yrs - ARR 28 so NTT 3.4
27What are Your First Thoughts?
28CRVOs What matters to us?
- What are the Threats to Vision?
- 1. MACULAR Edema, Ischemia, Intraretinal
hemorrhage. - 2. PROLIFERATIVE NVG, Preretinal/Vitreous
Hemorrhage.
29Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Study (CVOS)
- Does macular grid laser therapy help macular
edema in CRVO patients? - Does prophylactic PRP (before the presence of
anterior segment NV) prevent the presence of
anterior segment NV and resultant NVG?
30Macular Edema in CRVOs
- Macular Edema 155 patients,
- all with 20/50 VA or worse.
- Grid therapy did not help. Statistical
significance was not found at 4 months, - 1 year, 2 years or 3 years.
31Non-Ischemic CRVOs.
- Non-ischemic 547 patients (none treated),
followed every 4 months to see what percentage
progressed to ischemic. - Answer 15 became ischemic 6 of this group
developed anterior segment NV.
32Ischemic CRVOs.
- Ischemic 181 patients (90 received immediate
PRP, 91 followed and received PRP only if
anterior segment NV developed). - Prophylactic PRP reduced the risk of anterior
segment NV from. - 35 (untreated group) to 20 (prophylactic PRP
group).
33Ischemic CRVOs.
- However, 2 months later, the control and treated
groups had the same percentage (15) likelihood
of anterior segment NV. - And, most importantly, the groups had equal
likelihood of developing neovascular glaucoma
(4).
34Ischemic CRVOs.
- Based on the results of the study, is
prophylactic PRP necessary to prevent
neovascularization of the angle and resultant
glaucoma? - NO!
35What about steroid injections?
- Standard Care vs. COrticosteroid for Retinal Vein
Occlusion (SCORE) study - Goal Improve acuity by 15 or more letters
- Results At 12 months, 27 of patients with 1 mg
triamcinolone acetonide intravitreal injections
achieved goal. - Only 7 of patients in the observation group
achieved goal.
36CRVO SUMMARY.
- How do we use this evidence to manage our CRVO
patients? -
- Recall the threats to vision. which are
treatable, and on what timetable?
37Summary of CRVOs and BRVOs
- Neovascularization.. when do PRP?
- Macular Edema - evidence on grid laser
photocoagulation.
38Final Thoughts.
- --Thoughts on evidence based medicine
- --Knowing how to apply the statistics
39Recommended Trials
- ARMD TRIALS
- Visudyne
- Macugen
- AREDS
- Lucentis
- DIABETES TRIALS
- Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (DRS)
- Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study
(ETDRS)
40Recommended Trials.
- GLAUCOMA TRIALS
- Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS)
- Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study
(CNTGS) - Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study
(CIGTS) - Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial (EMGT)
- Glaucoma Laser Treatment (GLT) Study
- Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study
- VEIN OCCLUSION TRIALS
- BRANCHED RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION STUDY
- CENTRAL VEIN OCCLUSION STUDY
41More Trials.
- OTHER TRIALS
- THE OPTIC NEURITIS TREATMENT TRIAL
- HEDS -1 THE HERPETIC EYE DISEASE STUDY
- HEDS-2 HERPETIC EYE DISEASE STUDY- II
42THANK YOU!