Bernd Carsten Stahl - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Bernd Carsten Stahl

Description:

Deontology as the foundation of ethics. Morality as practice, ethics as theory ... No final foundation (such as reason) Duty is not the central idea ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: berndcars
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Bernd Carsten Stahl


1
Bernd Carsten Stahl
2
(No Transcript)
3
Ethics and Morality
  • The German Approach
  • Deontology as the foundation of ethics
  • Morality as practice, ethics as theory
  • Reason as the basis of ethics
  • Representatives Kant and Habermas
  • The French Approach
  • No final foundation (such as reason)
  • Duty is not the central idea
  • Ethics aims as the good life, moral rules
    enforces freedom
  • Representatives Montaigne and Ricoeur

4
Responsibility
  • Social construct of ascription
  • Ascribes an object to a subject
  • Aims to promote the good life
  • Other relevant dimensions
  • Authority
  • Type (moral, role, legal,)
  • Temporal dimension (ex ante ex post)
  • Reflexive vs transitive ascription
  • Excuses / Exemptions

5
Problems of Responsibility
  • Conditions
  • Freedom
  • Causality
  • Power
  • Personal qualities
  • Subject
  • Individual / collective
  • Machines as subjects
  • Object
  • Uncertainty / risk / contingency
  • Side effects
  • Collective effects

6
Reflective Responsibility
  • Commonalities of responsibility
  • Openness (procedure and outcome)
  • Affinity to action (implies manifest results)
  • Consequentialism (good life consequences count)
  • Reflective responsibility
  • Applies responsibility to itself is the use of
    responsibility responsible is it open, does it
    lead to action, promote the good life?
  • Requires a formal approach
  • Normative and factual claims are debated
    simultaneously
  • Overcomes the problems of responsibility
    ascriptions

7
Consequences of Reflective Responsibility
  • Theoretical consequences
  • Clarity of the notion
  • Pragmatism in ascriptions
  • Modesty of aims
  • Recognition of constructivist / constructionist
    nature
  • Acceptance of inevitability
  • Prudence / phronesis
  • Accommodates uncertainty
  • Mediates theory and practice ethics and morality

8
Consequences of Reflective Responsibility
  • Realisability
  • Accountability
  • Institutions
  • Imputation
  • Discourse ethics
  • Stakeholder approach

9
Pros and Cons of Reflective Responsibility
  • Disadvantages
  • Practical realisability
  • Risk of failure
  • Unclear ethical evaluation of outcome of
    ascription
  • Advantages
  • Mediates ethics and morality
  • Facilitates normative and factual discussions
  • Realises inevitability of ascriptions and
    attempts to optimise them
  • Offers a formal, procedural, and realisable
    approach to info ethics

10
International Journal of Technology and Human
Interaction
  • www.ijthi.net
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com