Title: Regionalism: Policy Options For India
1Relative Importance of North-South and
South-South Trade Bipul Chatterjee Deputy
Executive Director, CUTS International
(www.cuts-international.org) Director, CUTS
Centre for International Trade, Economics
Environment (www.cuts-citee.org) Presented at
the OECD Global Forum on Trade A Trade Policy
Dialogue on the Multiple Dimensions of Market
Access and Development Organised by OECD Trade
Directorate, World Bank and the Government of
Mexico Mexico City, 23-24 October 2006
2Introduction
- Currently there is more trade between North and
South (N-S), but South-South (S-S) trade is
rising though it is lopsided - There is a growing realisation in the South to
enhance cooperation among themselves (through
bilateral preferential trade agreements (PTAs)
and regional integration) - Political and macroeconomic structure of many
developing countries do not permit deep
integration free trade agreements (FTAs) and/or
comprehensive economic cooperation agreements
(CECAs) strong political will and institutional
apparatus for policy-making and implementation
are required
3South-South Cooperation
- PTAs are mostly focusing on increasing
merchandise trade by minimising exclusions,
adopting less restrictive rules of origin
provisions and trade facilitation at the border - However, many of these countries suffer from
their small market size and similar economic
conditions rarely provides incentives for more
trade - Monitoring mechanism (impact assessment) are
often inadequate and do not receive sustained,
high-level political attention - The effectiveness is severally constrained by
negative list, complicated rules of origin
provisions, inverted duty structure, less
awareness among consumers, etc (other than high
tariffs) - Services cross-border projects help deeper
cooperation (e.g. Highway Project in the GMS
Region) requires huge political will -
4North-South Cooperation
- These agreements are expected to score better on
implementation - They can integrate economies with different
technological capabilities and different factor
endowments - However, tighter rules of origin, more
restrictive exclusion of particular sectors can
reduce benefits especially for Southern
producers and Northern consumers - Many developing countries feel that such
cooperation will bring increased investment in
their economies, but empirical evidence is
unconvincing investment (especially FDI) is a
different game -
5Domestic Preparedness
- Negotiations and implementation of initiatives
like India-Sri Lanka, India-Thailand FTAs show
inadequate preparation on issues like rules of
origin, negative list of products - Protection through the so-called negative list
needs to be reduced significant scope for
rent-seeking - Vulnerability of specific sectors are to be
factored into the process of negotiations through
sustainability impact assessment (economic,
social, environmental and political
sustainability of PTAs, including sectoral
studies) before an agreement is entered into
force and also during the process of
implementation (for taking appropriate measures
for changes through renegotiations as an
in-built mechanism) systematic collection,
storage and analysis of data is required, so that
there is less scope for rhetoric
6Options for Developing Counties
- Promote multilateral trade liberalisation
-
- Promote policy coherence trade ministry should
have a separate unit on policy coherence - Promote regional trade integration by harmonising
rules and procedures with concomitant reduction
of MFN tariffs regional economic communities
should be institutionally strengthened and
involve local communities - Promote awareness among the actors involved in
cross-border informal trade formalisation of
informal trade will be a win-win situation for
those engaged and the governments - Relatively more flexible attitude (greater
political will) at national and regional level is
required for services liberalisation focus on
those sectors, which benefit the poor most
7Conclusions
- Whether PTAs/FTAs between North-South and/or
South-South contribute or undermine the MTS
depends on specific content of each agreement
should be made WTO-compatible before an agreement
comes into force - The original motive for economic cooperation
between countries (whether N-S and/or S-S) was
political (and will remain so) and these
agreements have become a tool to pursue some
significant political strategies by some major
players, including a developing country like
India - Large developing countries should provide
duty-free, quota-free access to products from
least developed countries with a minimum number
of items in the negative list
operationalising South-South trade cooperation
8 - Trade liberalisation should be benchmarked with
domestic preparedness (a dynamic process)
relationship between trade liberalisation and
domestic regulatory reforms should be looked at
closely (policy coherence) - Liberalisation of services should be done first
at the regional level for instance, there is a
huge scope for cooperation in transport and
logistic services, energy services in South Asia
largely untapped and could be a significant
source of pro-poor growth in future involve
civil society with the process of liberalisation
so as to have a better political buy-in,
especially at the local level