Implementing Education Decentralization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Implementing Education Decentralization

Description:

MOE capitation grants. Hybrid: South Africa. Devolution to ... Block grants to provinces and capitation grants to schools. Increased access and. fiscal equity. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: rti69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Implementing Education Decentralization


1
Implementing Education Decentralization
  • Donald Winkler
  • RTI International
  • EGAT/ED Global Sector Training Workshop
  • August 8, 2005

2
Why Focus on Decentralization?
  • Decentralization is a dominant policy direction
    in many countries.
  • Questions about design and implementation.
  • Questions about impact Quality, equity,
    efficiency, and democratization.
  • Our EQUIP2 focus Implementation,
    accountability, finance.

3
EQUIP2 Activities
  • Knowledge sharing, development of analytic
    framework, tools to facilitate implementation.
  • Policy and Country Briefs Synthesis of good
    international practicesinformation, report
    cards, accountability, finance.
  • Decentralization Workshop Develop toolkit to
    facilitate implementation.

4
International Experience
  • Decentralization is global.
  • Long ago Federal Countries
  • Yesterday Latin America
  • Today Asia and Africa.

5
What is Education Decentralization?
  • Two basic types of education decentralization
  • School Autonomy Delegate responsibilities to
    schools
  • Devolution Devolve responsibilities to
    governments
  • Hybrid Model Devolution with Autonomy

6
Education Decentralization
  • DevolutionArgentina, Brazil, Indonesia,
    Pakistan, Spain
  • School AutonomyEl Salvador, Kenya, Nicaragua,
    Armenia, New Zealand
  • HybridEgypt, Peru

7
Devolution Argentina
  • Rapid devolution to provincial governments.
  • Continued centralized control at provincial
    level.
  • Slow transformation of central MOE.
  • No impact at school level despite major reform.

8
Autonomy El Salvador
  • Schools managed by community associations
    ACEsfull autonomy.
  • Rapidly increase access in remote areas.
  • Capacity not a constraint.
  • MOE capitation grants.

9
Hybrid South Africa
  • Devolution to provincial governments.
  • School Governing Boards manage budgets.
  • Block grants to provinces and capitation grants
    to schools.
  • Increased access and
  • fiscal equity.
  • Important role
  • of analysis.

10
Some Lessons Learned
  • Devolutionlittle impact on quality.
  • School autonomymore promising.
  • MOE--essential implementation role.
  • Critical role of information and standards in
    accountability.
  • Active participation of parents and
    teachersnecessary condition for quality.

11
Implementing Decentralization
  • Big Bang
  • Decentralization policy designed and implemented
    very quickly
  • E.g. Indonesia (2 years), Argentina (6 months)
  • Go Slow
  • Decentralization policy designed and implemented
    over many years
  • E.g. South Africa and Peru (4-5 years)
  • Spain (20 years)

12
Big Bang vs. Go Slow
  • Big Bang approach may result in poor policy
    design that makes implementation difficult but
    quickly creates a fait accompli.
  • Go Slow gives policy makers time to pay
    attention to details and gives reform opponents
    time to block significant change.
  • Either approach has significant risks for
    successful implementation.

13
Education Decentralization Toolkit
  • Three day workshop for key stakeholders.
  • Highly interactive exercises.
  • Tools to
  • Create a common vision
  • Link decentralization to quality
  • Identify obstacles to implementation
  • Re-engineer processes
  • Meet conditions for accountability
  • Set priorities for moving ahead

14
Toolkit Objectives
  • Identify obstacles to implementation
  • Foster communication and build consensus
  • Develop agreement about priority objectives
  • Put the focus on teaching and learning in the
    classroom
  • Understand international lessons learned
  • Create understanding of the complexity and size
    of the implementation task.
  • Realize the need to restructure the MOE to
    support decentralized education

15
Education Decentralization Matrix
Function National Regional Local School
Governance
Finance
Personnel
Students
Curriculum
Facilities
16
Examples of Tools
  • Reverse Process Engineering

17
Egypt Experience
  • Participants Ministries of Education, Higher
    Education, Finance, and Local Administration
    Governorates
  • Content Emphasis on design, focus on quality,
    communication,
  • international experience,
  • identify Egyptian successes.

18
Resources on Decentralization
  • Additional Resources
  • USAID web site EQUIP2
  • www.equip123.net
  • World Bank website
  • www1.worldbank.org/publicsector
  • RTI Education Finance Decentralization
    Conference Website
  • https//register.rti.org/EducationFinance/index.cf
    m

19
Implementing Education Decentralization
  • Three countries
  • Peru Fernando BolaƱos
  • Uganda David Bruns
  • Zambia Cornelius Chipoma
  • Three questions
  • Country setting and status of decentralization?
  • Key difficulties in implementation?
  • USAID assistance strategies?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com