Challenges of non-leptonic weak decays on the lattice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Challenges of non-leptonic weak decays on the lattice

Description:

Recapitulate: Crutches are unavoidable. Key idea - common path to several crutches ... effort played a pivotal role in attaining a milestone in our ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: physikUni
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Challenges of non-leptonic weak decays on the lattice


1
Challenges of non-leptonic weak decays on the
lattice
  • Amarjit Soni
  • HET,BNL
  • (soni_at_bnl.gov,adlersoni_at_gmail.com)

2
Outline
  • Introduction Motivation
  • Recapitulate Crutches are unavoidable
  • Key idea -gt common path to several crutches
  • Lattice considerations
  • HLChPT its implications
  • Outlook

3
Introduction Motivation
  • Via the UT, Lattice Weak Matrix Elements
  • effort played a pivotal role in attaining a
    milestone in our understanding of CPV phenomena
  • For the future,though, exceedingly limited menu
    is/should be a very serious concern

4
Youngjoon Kwon
5
Youngjoon Kwon
6
Past performance future prospects
  • Some gloating over the past is justified.
  • Note, though, that program all initiated in 80s
  • Refinements therein are certainly useful
  • But expt/phenom needs are NOT frozen in
  • time.moves often speedily (esp.expt)

7
Focus on B-gtDM
8
(No Transcript)
9
ILLUSTRATES power of B decays
  • For 2 or more common modes of D0 ,
  • \bar D0 both weak and strong phases
  • can be extracted
  • 2 modes mean 4 observables versus
  • 4 unknowns rBM ,wk phase ?,dstrong (mode1),
  • dstrong (mode2). Thus FOR THE FIRST TIME
  • a data driven method is able to tame DIRECT CPV.
  • Availablity of dozens of FS allows for
  • numerous similar useful applications

10
M K, K, pi, rho. For charged and neutral B are
of interest
11
Special note Br(B-gt\barD0 M),is very difficult
to measureexperimentally due to
technical(exptal) complications
12
(No Transcript)
13
Crutches are unavoidable
  • I. Infinite volume.lessons learned via
  • D-gtK piBernard, Simone,A.S.90
  • Abada et al, 90
  • Maiani Testa,90
  • Ciuchini,Franco,Martinelli,Silvestrini,96
  • II. Finite volume (K).Lellouch, Luscher,00
  • Lin,Martinelli,Sachrajda,Testa,01
  • Christ, Kim, Yamazaki ,06
  • Kim, Sachrajda, Sharpe,06

14
Useful crutches
  • QCDF
  • pQCD
  • SCET
  • HLChpt
  • .

Key idea common to all these crutches is that

15
Application of HLChPT to BgtDM(Christopher Aubin
A.S)
  • For HL mesons, (following WiseDonoghueBurdman)
    marry HQET ChPT.Now U(2m) spin-flavor symmetry
    on
  • the HQ side and standard SU(n)LXSU(n)R
  • for m heavy and n light flavors.
  • For definiteness m2 n3
  • For now, just to provide a concrete,though crude,
    0th order step use LO HLChPT.NLO clearly highly
  • desirable (i.e need a good student!)
  • Meantime

16
(No Transcript)
17
Weak NL Decays of Q(path analogous now to
BDSPW85)
18
For B-gtD only the scalar piece is relevant in
LO leads to the very simple (expected) relation
Similar relations in LO for the B-gt \bar D
case. An important diference is that for p -gt
K B0 -gt BS
19
B-gtD (M) decays -gt New B-parameters to avoid
confusion call B1-params (for decays)
Qi from Heff ?B1, b-gtcu l OR b-gtu bar-c l
D0
B,BS
For MK , use BS also i1,2 Vac Sat leads to
(e.g. for MK) 1(or 1/3) MBs f Bs MD f D
contrast with (8/3)M2 f2 for the ?B 2
20
Some Lattice Considerations
  • Relevant important decays involve no
  • quark loops, no mixing with LDO -gt less
    worrysome even with mixed action approaches
  • However, partial cancellationa la GL74
    AM74 between contributions of Q1 Q 2 puts
    more demand on accuracy.
  • B1s are simultaneously (along with the usual
    Bs) accessible represent basically a new
    application

21
Hand-waving estimate
  • Sqrt(rBM) Vub /(Vcb Vus) 0.4/Neff
  • THUS what is relevant for (L)QCD
  • is a precise determination of Neff in
  • the above.
  • . Neff c2 (c1/N)/ (c2/N) c1

22
How well are rBM currently known?
  • Sqrt(rBK ) (VS) 0.16 - 0.08 CRUDE GUESS
    ( Large N partial cancellation)
  • Direct experimental determination (so far)has
    gotten the 1-s error on rBK to be 130 , i.e rBK
    0.012-0.015 (See hep-ex/0607065 /or HFAG07)
  • Since of central interest is ratio which
  • scales as 1/N (in amplitude), concern
  • reg. HLChpt may be addrssed by varying
  • the momentum of M and/or lattice masses

23
Possible Impact
  • Lattice determination of Neff can help
  • in improving constraint on ? (using input
  • value of Vub )
  • Of course,eventually,experimentalist will
    simultaneously extract both ? rBK , as is
  • guaranteed by the method, then with input
  • from the lattice of Neff , exptal knowledge of
    rBK allows a new way to determine Vub /(Vcb Vus)

24
Summary OUTLOOK
  • .Non-leptonic weak decays continue to
  • be challengingHUGE POTENTIAL
  • Specific example B-gtD0 (\bar D0) K very useful
    for UT phase ? and also for Vub possibly
    providing a new (NL) avenue to Vub
  • HLChPT provides a starting point LOChPT
  • gives all relevant decay ?B1 amplitudes in
    terms of charcteristic two fig. 8 (B1) parameters
  • . Simulateously accessible along with usual
    mixing ( ?B2) B-parameters
  • Numerous continuum ideas and tons of available
    data should provide useful bridges.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com