Using HRTS Data in TRANSP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

Using HRTS Data in TRANSP

Description:

... HRTS data can then be interpolated onto this grid at each ... Then re-interpolate onto fine grid which is constant with time. Write new PPF of re-mapped data ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: chal3
Category:
Tags: hrts | transp | data | using

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Using HRTS Data in TRANSP


1
  • Using HRTS Data in TRANSP
  • I. Jenkins

2
HRTS Data in TRANSP I
  • HRTS data now routinely available giving much
    higher resolution esp. at plasma edge.
  • However, trajectory of the laser is further from
    the plasma midplane data needs remapping before
    use in TRANSP (this was not an issue for LIDAR)
  • Initial attempt used an EFIT equilib. (one time
    point) and used FLUSH routines to remap R vector
    of HRTS. OK for pulses where equilib. Relatively
    stable during period of interest, but still not
    using correct equilib. (FLUSH does not work with
    TRANSP equilib.)

3
HRTS data in TRANSP II
  • Remapping onto TRANSP equilibrium requires
    initial run with un-mapped data
  • This eq. is stored in the .cdf file as a series
    of flux contours (normalised poloidal flux) which
    can be reconstructed
  • Then create a 2D (R,z) grid of flux using IDL
    function
  • The (R,z) vector of HRTS data can then be
    interpolated onto this grid at each time point
  • Then re-interpolate onto fine grid which is
    constant with time
  • Write new PPF of re-mapped data

Z (cm)
76063T33 _at_44.718s
R (cm)
4
HRTS data in TRANSP III
  • Difference in input data to leads to different
    kinetic profiles in TRANSP run
  • Here T04 (raw data) compared with T42 (fully
    re-mapped and smoothed)

5
HRTS in TRANSP IIII
  • Comparison of measured Wdia vs TRANSP calculation

After re-mapping
Before re-mapping (T04)
6
Effect on BS Current
  • Re-mapping data will have effect on position and
    magnitude of Te,Ne gradients effect on
    calculated bootstrap current

Te,Ne and CURBS _at_6.0s fot 78085 T02 (raw HRTS)
and T11 (remapped) show the difference in
calculated CURBS (bootstrap profile) When
this is integrated can lead to substantial
difference in total BS current
7
Conclusions
  • Re-mapping HRTS data required for TRANSP
  • IDL code developed to do this using equilibrium
    from initial TRANSP run
  • Results show improved agreement with measured
    Wdia and better match of kinetic/magnetic plasma
    edge
  • Code is available to JET TRANSP runners as
    required
  • Ti re-mapping does not cause such big difference
    (not usually strong gradient at edge) but
    re-mapping methods are being investigated
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com