Planning for the Cost of Quality - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Planning for the Cost of Quality

Description:

Quality Management Systems and Strategic Planning. Presented by Rick Panning, MBA, CLS(NCA) ... Whole blood and apheresis collections. Blood product manufacturing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: swr97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Planning for the Cost of Quality


1
Planning for the Cost of Quality
  • CLSI Global Health
  • Quality Management Systems and Strategic Planning
  • Presented by Rick Panning, MBA, CLS(NCA)
  • April 2, 2009

2
Building in the Cost of Quality a journey
  • My career journey last three employers
  • Fairview Health Services
  • Making the case to add quality resources
  • Understanding the relationship between process
    improvement, quality and patient safety
  • American Red Cross-Blood Services
  • The building blocks for quality management
    existed, but
  • needed to embed quality into day-to-day
    operations (primarily collections and
    manufacturing)
  • Allina Hospitals and Clinics
  • Quality and operations integrated
  • Quality essentials at the core
  • Moving to the next level

3
The cost of a lack of quality
  • Understanding the incremental costs in the system
    if quality is not at the core of operations
  • Impact on patients time delays, repeat testing,
    incorrect results/incorrect diagnosis
  • Impact on resources rework related to errors,
    lost productivity opportunity, wasted supplies,
    measuring for measurings sake
  • Lost revenue opportunity lost or potential
    business, impact on revenue (P4P)
  • Accreditation risks CAP, AABB, Joint Commission
    deficiencies

4
A process improvement journey
  • Fairview Introduction of 6 Sigma / DMAIC in
    2002-2003
  • Improve consistency of performance by reducing
    defects
  • Turnaround time
  • Reaching a 6 Sigma level of performance results
    in reduced cost. Defectscost
  • Beginning the LEAN journey in 2003.
  • Reducing waste in all processes / reduce the
    noise
  • Decrease TAT and improved consistency
  • One-piece flow reduced opportunities for error
  • Reduced resource needs (lower cost) and improve
    quality performance
  • Embedding process improvement in the culture
  • seeing with new eyes

5
Red Cross changing the culture to understand
that quality is the job
  • Quality assurance and quality management
    comprised many policies and procedures, as well
    as many resources in the organization, but
  • The organizations quality performance had
    resulted in significant FDA issues and media
    attention.
  • Why? Organization did not mandate standard
    practice AND quality was viewed as something
    extra we have to do by operations.
  • Whole blood and apheresis collections
  • Blood product manufacturing

6
Red Cross-North Central Blood Services
  • Quality performance Quality report card
  • FY2006 28th out of 36 regions in performance
  • FY2008 9th out of 36 regions in performance
  • Consequences of poor quality performance
  • Decreased collections (decreased revenue, not
    meeting patient needs, cost per unit collected
    was high)
  • Higher percentage of collected units needed to be
    quarantined or discarded

7
Red Cross What changed?
  • Had to change the culture which regarded quality
    requirements as something extra and as
    something required by the quality department (as
    opposed to being core to operations and part of
    the job)
  • Changes includes
  • Message from the top of the organization
    President, Division VP, Region CEOs, regional
    management
  • Re-education about quality requirements
  • Sharing data on performance quality
    deficiencies by team and individual
  • Setting performance expectations
  • Adding non-operational supervisor to all drives
    to monitor performance and provide 11 support
  • Lean processes introduced in collections and
    manufacturing

8
Red Cross What were the outcomes?
  • Quality profile improved steadily (2006-08)
  • Quarantined/discarded units decreased
  • Collections goal performance improved 3 straight
    years
  • Units collected per FTE improved
  • Revenue improved
  • Cost per unit collected decreased

9
Allina
  • Dedicated quality staff as part of corporate
    administrative team
  • 2 administrative FTEs (director, staff) with one
    administrative assistant
  • Director part of corporate quality management
    team
  • Plan to expand by 2.0 FTEs during 2009 and 2010
    as new organizational is developed to include
    metro and regional hospitals, outreach program
    and 70 clinics
  • Goal of pursuing ISO 15189
  • Responsible for
  • Coordination of system accreditation activities
  • Establish and maintain quality management
    infrastructure (based on CLSI Quality System
    Essentials)
  • Assure that Quality essentials are integrated
    into the budget and strategic planning process
  • With input of operations, develop quality goals
    and indicators/measurements

10
Prior to 2009
  • Current State
  • Each metro lab leader is accountable for
    reporting at least one quality indicator.
  • Each metro lab leader presents an annual report
    at the Quality Committee.
  • The status of each indicator is to be reported
    quarterly.
  • There are varying degrees of compliance with
    providing the quarterly reports.
  • Regional labs participate in some indicators, but
    not all labs are represented.
  • Indicators did not consistently integrate with
    overall operational performance.

11
2009 and going forward
  • Identify system-wide aspects of the laboratory
    performance that need focused attention - patient
    safety, patient service, regulatory requirements,
    or inconsistent or inadequate past performance.
  • Projects formally endorsed by the Quality
    Committee and Operational Leadership team.
  • Form teams for each project to focus on making
    improvements service, financial, quality, pt
    safety.
  • Each lab leader expected to participate in at
    least one improvement project.
  • System-wide projects - representation from metro
    labs, regional labs, and clinic labs (when
    applicable).
  • Each team identifies goals and associated
    measures. Each performance measure should be
    linked to an associated financial measure
  • Each team compiles a quarterly status report,
    identifying progress toward goals and barriers
    impeding progress.

12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Quality Indicators
  • Balance scorecard
  • All must be linked to one of Allinas strategic
    focus areas.
  • Care
  • Service
  • Growth
  • Financial Health
  • People

15
Rick PanningVice President, Laboratory
ServicesAllina Hospitals and ClinicsMinneapolis,
MN612-262-5012rick.panning_at_allina.com
16
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com