Proposal to Study Alternative CO2 Methods for Possible Mars Extravehicular Activities Using Permeabl - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Proposal to Study Alternative CO2 Methods for Possible Mars Extravehicular Activities Using Permeabl

Description:

Limited to 50 adsorb/desorb cycles. Summary and Problem Statement ... Zeolites: Adsorb CO2. Technical Objectives and Methodology ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: donat163
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Proposal to Study Alternative CO2 Methods for Possible Mars Extravehicular Activities Using Permeabl


1
Proposal to Study Alternative CO2 Methods for
Possible Mars Extravehicular Activities Using
Permeable Membranes and Molecular Sieves
  • Daniel Carvajal
  • Adam Darrow
  • Matthew Estes
  • Greg Pang
  • Vitaliy Vatkovsky

2
Abstract
  • Goal To develop and test a membrane/zeolite
    based CO2 removal system

3
So why do we need CO2 removal?
  • Wouldnt it be easier just to dump the gasses the
    astronaut breathes out?
  • It would make the PLSS simpler, and it would be
    lighter.
  • So, lets get rid of the CO2 removal device..
    Right?

4
Not So Fast!!
  • Astronauts only consume somewhere between 3 to 5
    of the O2 in each breath.
  • We need the CO2 removal device to be able to
    reuse all this oxygen.
  • If not astronauts would have to carry somewhere
    between 25 to 30 times the oxygen they normally
    carry!!!

5
Introduction
  • Current Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA) CO2
    removal systems
  • Lithium Hydroxide (LiOH)
  • Metal Oxides (Metox)

6
LiOH
  • So we need CO2 removal, what now?
  • We use LiOH 2LiOH(s)CO2(g)?Li2CO3(s)H20(s)
  • Very High Efficiency, 92.
  • Non-Regenerable.
  • You need 1 kg per 8 hour EVA.
  • This will NOT work for Mars!!!

7
Metox
  • So what has NASA looked into as alternatives?
  • Metal Oxides looked promising.
  • AgO is the most promising.
  • Less efficient, only 18.9.
  • Regenerable, but what is the cost?
  • 1.865 kJ/gCO2

8
Problems With Current CO2 Removal Systems
  • LiOH
  • Relatively non-regenerable
  • Metox
  • Weight considerations
  • Limited to 50 adsorb/desorb cycles

9
Summary and Problem Statement
  • Remove CO2 from closed Portable Life Support
    Systems (PLSS)
  • More efficient/Longer-lasting
  • Lighter
  • Membranes Offer differing permeabilities for CO2
    and O2
  • Zeolites Adsorb CO2

10
Technical Objectives and Methodology
  • Combination of permeable membranes and molecular
    sieves creates a highly desirable system for CO2
    removal
  • The research will focus on designing and
    optimizing such a system

11
Phase 1 Data Collection
Variables to Measure
  • Composition of O2/CO2 mixture
  • Temperature
  • Pressure
  • Rate of feed gas
  • Amount of water vapor

12
(No Transcript)
13
Phase 2 Evaluation of Efficiency
  • Find the optimal settings for the five variables
  • Balance comfort with efficiency

14
Phase 3 Implementation of Design
  • Further refinement of settings.
  • Adjustment to meet engineering restrictions of
    PLSS and Martian conditions.

15
Phase 4 Further Application
16
Timeline
  • August - September 2002 Assembly Period
  • October - November 2002 Stage 1 Testing
  • December 2002 Analyze data
  • February 2003 Optimize Stage 2 design
  • March - April 2003 Stage 2 Testing
  • May 2003 Analyze Stage 2 data and construct
    report

17
Management Structure
  • Principal Investigator
  • Industrial Liaison
  • Academic Liaison
  • Chief Researcher
  • Researchers
  • Machine Shop Technician
  • Outreach Coordinator/Instructors

18
Outreach
  • Waste Removal Class at Washington Elementary
    School
  • Interactive lectures and exercises

19
Conclusion
  • Improve EMU for a terrestrial exploration of Mars
  • Further application in other fields
  • Air purification
  • Hazardous Materials (suits)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com