Some Issues in Accounting and Implications for FSA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Some Issues in Accounting and Implications for FSA

Description:

Inventory cost-flow assumption. Accounting for fixed assets. Accounting for intangible assets ... Ending inventory at older prices ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Amy38
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Some Issues in Accounting and Implications for FSA


1
Some Issues in Accounting and Implications for FSA
  • Lecture 6

2
Topics
  • Revenue and expense recognition
  • Inventory cost-flow assumption
  • Accounting for fixed assets
  • Accounting for intangible assets

3
Revenue recognition
  • Considered one of the most important issues in
    financial reporting by policy makers
  • Despite many rulings, firms appear to have some
    discretion on when and how they recognize
    revenues
  • Important to an analyst because an analyst has to
    determine the quality and the sustainability of
    revenues over time

4
Regulatory concern
5
Revenue recognition
  • Under the accrual basis of accounting, the
    principles are clear Recognize revenue when
  • Services are provided (all or substantial
    portion), and
  • Benefits are realized or realizable
  • Issues arise with respect to the determination of
  • What constitutes a service
  • When services (or a substantial portion of
    services) have been provided
  • What is considered realizable
  • Analyst must assess whether these determinations
    are appropriate
  • Time of sale recognition most common

6
Issues with time of sale recognition
  • May be too early if
  • High uncollectible receivables
  • Increase in receivable days outstanding
  • High returned goods
  • Excessive warranty expenses
  • The practice is to book sales upon receipt of a
    customer order, and not the delivery of the
    product

7
Expense recognition
  • The matching principle
  • Expense costs directly associated with revenues
    in the period in which revenues are recognized
  • Otherwise, treat them as period expenses
  • Again, firms have some latitude with respect to
    many items such as
  • Depreciation
  • Bad debt expense
  • Warranty expense

8
Book examples
  • Xerox
  • Bundles
  • Revenues from leasing copiers
  • Revenues from maintenance services
  • Photocopying paper (up to minimum usage)
  • Financing
  • What should Xerox be doing?
  • Analyst must have a good understanding of a
    companys revenue recognition methods
  • Metropolitan Life Insurance company
  • Receive cash from premiums and investments
  • Invest in readily marketable securities
  • Issues
  • When to recognize revenue and what to do with
    unrealized gains/losses from marketable
    securities?
  • Expenses are selling and administrative costs and
    the face value of the policy. How should these
    expenses be recognized?

9
Examples
  • Microstrategy (Software company)
  • Providers of customized software
  • Two revenue components
  • Use of software over the contract period
  • Service in the form of training
  • What are the revenue recognition issues?
  • Walgreen
  • Recognition of rebates from suppliers
  • Recognize rebates when realized or based on
    estimates?

10
Revenue recognition when cash collectibility is
uncertain
  • Typically delay revenue recognition when the cash
    is received, or when the uncertainty goes down
    substantially. Examples
  • Installment method
  • Cost recovery method

11
Income recognition other than at the time of sale
  • Income recognition for long-term contractors
  • Percentage-of-completion method
  • Income recognition spread over the period that
    the contract spans
  • Contract in process account reflects this income
    recognition
  • Completed contract method
  • Income recognition at the end of the contract
    period
  • Contract in process account valued at cost
  • When to use each method?

12
More on managing revenues
  • Analysts often issue both earnings and revenue
    forecasts. Market appears to focus on both of
    them
  • Earnings announcements that provide a discussion
    of both earnings and revenue performance are easy
    to find. The following are two such examples
  • ..At 21 billion, IBMs first quarter revenue
    rose 8.8 percent from the 19.3 billion it
    reported during the same period a year earlier
    and was slightly above the 20.8 billion analysts
    had generally expected, according to the First
    Call survey. (IBM meets the Street, CNNFN,
    April 18, 2001, 439PM ET).
  • ..HP posted sales of 12.0 billion in the
    year-ago quarter, and 11.9 billion in its first
    fiscal quarter. First Calls forecast had called
    for the companys revenues to rise to 12.2
    billion in the current quarter. (HP warns about
    2Q results, CNNFN, April 18, 2001, 1115AM ET).
  • Evidence indicates that
  • Typically, market reacts positively if firms meet
    earnings forecasts, but not always!
  • Electronic Data Systems announced a significant
    increase in 4th quarter earnings relative to the
    previous year. The earnings exceeded the
    analysts consensus earnings forecast by two
    cents per share. However, on the day of the
    announcement when the DJIA increased 119 points
    (1.2), the companys stock price decreased 4.7
    percent. The reason stated by analysts was that
    revenues increased by only 13 percent, which was
    below expectations of 17 percent.

13
More on managing revenues
  • Rees and Sivaramakrishnan (2005)
  • There is a significant increase in market
    response to meeting earnings forecasts when
    revenue forecasts are met.
  • There is a significant reduction is market
    response to meeting earnings forecasts when
    revenue forecasts are not met.
  • There is a significant attenuation in market
    penalty to missing earnings forecasts when
    revenue forecasts are met.
  • There is a significant increase is market penalty
    to missing earnings forecasts when revenue
    forecasts are not met.
  • No wonder managers are worried about meeting
    revenue benchmarks

14
Regulatory response
  • Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 101 issued by SEC
  • To curb premature recognition of revenues as a
    mechanism for managing earnings to meet Wall
    Street Expectations
  • Improper revenue recognition is the largest
    single issue in restatements of financial
    statements
  • Requires restatements by focusing on revenue
    recognition practices

15
Regulatory response
16
Regulatory response
17
Regulatory response
  • Question Is there a detectable difference in a
    firms ability to manage earnings before and
    after the implementation of SAB 101?
  • A study by Altumoro, Beatty and Weber (2002)

18
Altumoro, Beatty and Weber (2002)
  • Study a sample of firms that recorded cumulative
    effects adjustments because of SAB 101
  • Compare with sample of firms matched on industry
    and assets that did not have to restate (control
    firms)
  • Find that
  • Restating firms had greater analyst following
  • Restating firms had a stronger incentive to
    engage in earnings management
  • Restating firms were less likely to miss
    important earnings benchmarks prior to SAB 101
  • Approximately one third of the firms might have
    missed the earnings benchmark.
  • Suggests that these firms were prematurely
    recognizing revenues
  • Interestingly, the predictive ability of earnings
    with respect to future cash flows decreased after
    the implementation of SAB 101!

19
Firms response to SAB 101
  • Evidence indicates that
  • Managers delay recognition of revenue using both
    accounts receivable and deferred revenue when
    pre-managed earnings exceed earnings benchmarks
    by a large margin
  • Managers accelerate recognition of revenue when
    pre-managed earnings miss earnings benchmarks by
    a lit
  • It appears there is still a lot of grey area
    subsequent to SAB 101!

20
Inventory cost-flow assumptions
  • Why do we need to make an assumption about
    inventory cost flows?
  • FIFO, LIFO, Weighted average
  • FIFO
  • Ending inventory closest to current replacement
    costs
  • COGS is understated
  • LIFO
  • COGS stated using more recent prices
  • Ending inventory at older prices
  • SEC requires footnote disclosure of the extent to
    which LIFO inventory valuation is less than
    inventory valuation using FIFO or current cost.
  • In periods of rising prices income will be higher
    under FIFO than under LIFO, but ending inventory
    will be valued higher under LIFO than under FIFO,
    but for one exception (?)
  • Firms prefer LIFO for tax purposes, but if they
    choose LIFO for tax purposes, they must also
    choose LIFO for financial reporting purposes.
  • Yet, many firms adopt FIFO.

21
What do LIFO adopters look like?
  • Firms which face rapidly increasing prices of
    inputs
  • Firms facing cyclical demand patterns and have to
    manage inventory accordingly. LIFO, by matching
    current inventory price to sales, helps more in
    smoothing fluctuations
  • Motivated by tax savings
  • Industry practice
  • Larger firms tend to adopt LIFO
  • Why would firms adopt FIFO? Why would LIFO firms
    switch to FIFO?

22
How does the market react when firms change
cost-flow assumptions?
  • Recall that if a firm chooses LIFO for tax
    purposes, it must also choose LIFO for financial
    reporting purposes
  • A switch to LIFO results in potential tax
    savings. This should evoke a positive market
    reaction
  • A switch to LIFO results in a lower income. If
    the market is fixated on income to evaluate
    companies, this may be viewed negatively
  • Mixed evidence on this issue. The best answer
    perhaps is, it depends?

23
Points for analysis
  • How should we calculate inventory turnover
    ratios? Using FIFO or Using LIFO?
  • Be careful when comparing inventory turnover
    ratios across firms if they use different
    assumptions
  • Inventory cost-flow assumption also affects the
    current ratio

24
Earnings quality and cost flow assumption
  • Cost of goods sold is computed using more recent
    prices under LIFO
  • Thus, LIFO COGS is more closely related to
    replacement costs
  • It is a better measure of the opportunity cost
    which is especially relevant for a going concern
    COGS represents the cost of replacing resources
  • Market return seems to more closely follow LIFO
    based income that FIFO based income
  • This indicates that the market views LIFO based
    earnings as being of higher quality
  • On the other hand, FIFO inventory values in the
    balance sheet are of higher quality. Why?
  • Difference is not much when
  • Inventory is fast moving
  • Prices are stable over time
  • Analysts should be aware enough
  • To eliminate holding gains arising from dipping
    into LIFO LAYERS

25
Accounting for intangibles
  • Intangible assets include trade name, brand name,
    patents, customer base, goodwill
  • Expense immediately costs incurred to develop
    intangibles
  • Capitalize expenditures made to acquire
    intangible assets
  • Amortize assets known to have finite useful lives
    (such as when specified in contractual
    arrangements)
  • Goodwill recognized only through acquisitions. No
    amortization of goodwill. Subject to impairment
    tests.
  • Typically, balance sheet understates the value of
    intangible assets.

26
Accounting for RD Software development
  • Research and development
  • As we know, RD needs to be expensed.
  • There is never an asset on the balance sheet
    indicating potential future benefits
  • Why?
  • For some companies RD expenses can be extremely
    high
  • In steady state it may not matter
  • For growing firms, this may be troublesome.
  • Software development
  • The rules are quite fuzzy for software
    development costs
  • Expense until technological feasibility is
    established
  • Amortize any additional development costs
    subsequently
  • Allows room for discretion
  • IBM, Microsoft, Adobe examples in the book.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com