Evaluating A Systemic Therapy Psoriasis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluating A Systemic Therapy Psoriasis

Description:

Dr. Robert Stern ' Lets pass on the PASI' (not a compliment to the PASI) Dr. Mark Lebwohl ' Now I entirely agree with Dr. Stern, we have to pass on the PASI. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: mcom3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluating A Systemic Therapy Psoriasis


1
Evaluating A Systemic TherapyPsoriasis
  • Efficacy
  • Safety
  • Labeling

2
What patients want!!!
  • Effective
  • Clear or nearly clear is what patients want
  • Keeps on working
  • Patients do not wish to constantly use therapy
    when the disease returns treatment should work at
    least as well.
  • Convenient- limited trips to MD
  • Not messy
  • Does not require much time

3
What patients want contd.
  • Safe
  • Does not make patient uncomfortable (or worse)
    while being used
  • Safe long term / repeated use does not preclude
    or interact with other treatments

4
Psoriasis
  • Psoriasis is a chronic disease (average duration
    about 50 years!!!
  • Extent and impact vary greatly among patients and
    in the affected individual over time.

5
Questions for today
  • Does it work?
  • Does it keep working?
  • Is it safe?
  • Do its potential benefits outweigh its risks?

6
Does it work?
  • In what types of patients has efficacy been
    demonstrated?
  • How well/often does it work?
  • (statistically significant is not enough)
  • What are factors associated with success/failure?
  • ( Do available data help select patients for
    when the drug is most effective?)

7
Does it keep working?
  • Psoriasis is a chronic disease.
  • If a treatment has risks, its utility depends on
  • Low incidence of rebound
  • Length of remission
  • Efficacy (by patient criteria)

8
Is it safe?
  • Short time and long term safety with use repeated
    must be assessed
  • Concerns for this class
  • Infection
  • Cancer especially lymphoma and SCC
  • Immunologically mediated diseases (LE, MS, etc).
  • Immunologic reaction to the drug (I.e.
    antibodies)
  • May decrease efficacy
  • May be a health risk

9
Is it safe contd
  • Do we have sufficient and robust data?
  • Is it likely PMS will provide timely and Robust
    date? (I.e can we rely on Phase IV commitments?)

10
Do its benefits outweigh its risks?
  • Short term perspective insufficient.
  • A long term view is needed
  • Do available data allow us to recommend approval?
  • What labeling will put the drug in proper
    perspective given when we know?

11
PASI
  • This meeting is not about the PASI ( or what
    percentage improvement represents significant
    clinical improvement.)
  • The PASI is a flawed scale.
  • We could (and have) spent many hours extolling
    its virtues and condemning its shortcomings.

12
Past Comments about the PASI at Advisory
Committee Meetings
  • Dr. Joseph McGuire I think no one is satisfied
    with the clinical fidelity of PASI.
  • Dr. Robert Stern Lets pass on the PASI
  • (not a compliment to the PASI)
  • Dr. Mark Lebwohl
  • Now I entirely agree with Dr. Stern, we have to
    pass on the PASI..

13
The Literature
  • Dr. Michael Bigby ( JAAD, 1996)
  • The major problem with indices ( PASI) is that
    they confound area of involvement with extent of
    disease.
  • Until better scales are developed trials with
    the simplest and most objective outcome variables
    are best. ( Bigby, JAAD, 1996)

14
A Proposal
  • Acknowledging the limitations of the evaluation
    metrics utilized in the studies we will review
    today, let us agree to utilize the agreed upon
    two primary end points today.
  • PASI 75 improvement
  • Clear or almost clear
  • And try not to complicate the discussion of
    this product with debate about how to measure
    psoriasis.

15
Current Labeling (Indication) of Systemic
Therapies for Psoriasis.
16
Caution Methoxsalen is a potent drug.
  • Photochemotherapy (Methoxsalen with long wave UVA
    radiation) is indicated for the symptomatic
    control of severe, recalcitrant disabling
    psoriasis not adequately responsive to other
    forms of therapy and when the diagnosis has been
    supported by biopsy.

17
Soriatane
  • Soriatane is indicated for the treatment of
    severe psoriasis.
  • Because of significant adverse effects
    associated with its use, Soriatane should be
    prescribed only by physicians knowledgeable in
    the systemic use of retinoids.
  • Methotrexate is indicated in the symptomatic
    control of severe, recalcitrant, disabling
    psoriasis that is not adequately responsive to
    other forms of therapy, but only when the
    diagnosis has been established, as a biopsy
    and/or after dermatologic consultation.

18
Neoral
  • Psoriasis Neoral is indicated for the treatment
    of adult, nonimmunocompromised patients with
    severe (I.e extensive and/or disabling)
    recalcitrant, plaque psoriasis who have failed to
    respond to at least one systemic therapy.

19
Amevive
  • Amevive is indicated for the treatment of adult
    patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque
    psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy
    or phototherapy.

20
Todays Task
  • Answers FDAs questions.
  • Judge if benefits outweigh Risk
  • Suggest Additional Data Needs for Judging Long
    Term Role
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com