Improving FDA/Industry Interactions: Suggestions from FDA/CDER Statisticians - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Improving FDA/Industry Interactions: Suggestions from FDA/CDER Statisticians

Description:

The views expressed in this presentation are those of the speakers and not ... Can YoU PRove Efficacy and Safety of curevir (CURES) Let's discuss ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: cde451
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Improving FDA/Industry Interactions: Suggestions from FDA/CDER Statisticians


1
Improving FDA/Industry Interactions Suggestions
from FDA/CDER Statisticians
  • Rafia Bhore, Ph.D.
  • Janice Derr, Ph.D.
  • FDA / CDER / Office of Biostatistics

The views expressed in this presentation are
those of the speakers and not necessarily of the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
2
CDER Office of Biostatistics
DB1 Cardiovascular Renal Neurological Psychiatric
DB2 Pulmonary Allergy Metabolism Endocrine Analgesics Anesthetics
DB3 Gastrointestinal Reproductive Urologic Dermatologic Dental
DB4 Anti-Infective Ophthalmology Anti-Viral Special Pathogen Transplant
DB5 Oncology Biologics Oncology Drugs Imaging Hematology
DB6 Generic Pharmacology Toxicology Chemistry Manufacturing Safety Special Projects Clinical Pharmacology
3
Communication Dynamics between FDA and Industry
Industry
Project Team
Project Manager
Regulatory Affairs
4
Interactions During Drug Development
Clinical Start
NDA/BLA Submission
NDA Review
Pre-clinical Research
Phase II
Phase III
Phase I
Pre-IND Meeting
EOP II Meeting
Pre-NDA Meeting
Labeling Meeting
5
Good Meeting Management Practices
  • GMMPs Facilitate input from review disciplines
  • Prior to internal meeting (draft responses to
    industry questions)
  • Internal meeting (preliminary comments to
    sponsor)
  • Formal meeting (moderated discussion)
  • Follow-up (meeting minutes, further discussion)

6
Suggestions from CDER Statisticians(Good Meeting
Practices)
  • Use a meeting with FDA as an opportunity to send
    in questions about statistical issues
  • Ask good questions that will give you useful
    answers
  • Provide sufficient detail to help us give useful
    statistical review comments
  • Use the channels of communication to get a
    response from FDA statisticians about statistical
    issues

7
Investigational New Drug Application (IND) Stage
  • Special Protocol Assessment
  • Statistical Analysis Plans

8
Special Protocol Assessment
SPA Guidance 2002
  • Sponsors can submit certain types of protocols
    with specific questions prior to start of study
    (Guidance recommends 90 days).
  • FDA determines if SPA process applies to the
    request, and if so, responds to questions within
    45 days (PDUFA goal).
  • Protocol agreements under SPA are part of the
    administrative record. Regulations describe the
    circumstances under which the agreements can be
    changed.

9
Suggestions from CDER Statisticians(Special
Protocol Assessment)
  • Ask good questions that will give you useful
    answers
  • Provide sufficient detail to help us give useful
    statistical review comments

10
Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Prospective plan of statistical methods not
    detailed in the Protocol
  • Protocol details design considerations vs. SAP
    details analysis considerations
  • Design Endpoints, type of control, planned
    comparisons, multiple testing, interim analyses
  • Analysis Statistical models, handling of missing
    data, nature of censoring, analysis populations,
    repeated measurements over time, study windows,
    etc.

11
Suggestions from CDER Statisticians(Statistical
Analysis Plan)
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) should be
    detailed and prospectively written
  • Prospectively submit to FDA for Phase 3 studies
    and Phase 2 supportive studies
  • Open-label studies submit before study begins
  • Blinded studies submit prior to last patient
    enrolled or first interim analysis (whichever
    comes first)

12
Suggestions from CDER Statisticians(Statistical
Analysis Plan contd.)
  • Identify critical issues at protocol design stage
    or at least Statistical Analysis Plan writing
  • Examples adjustment for multiplicity, interim
    analysis plan, non-inferiority evaluation,
    missing data,
  • Commercial Sponsors should encourage co-operative
    trialists to write a Statistical Analysis Plan

13
New Drug Application (NDA) Stage
  • Integrated Summary of Efficacy
  • Labeling

14
Integrated Summary of Efficacy (Suggestions from
CDER Statisticians)
  • Important component of New Drug Application
    Review
  • Provide clinically meaningful and logically tight
    argument whether drug has necessary evidence for
    efficacy claim
  • Provide side by side comparison of studies
  • NOT necessarily pooled or meta-analysis of
    efficacy
  • Discuss pooling study results with FDA

15
Integrated Summary of Efficacy Example Can YoU
PRove Efficacy and Safety of curevir (CURES)
16
Statistical Input on Labeling Text
  • FDA Statisticians review labeling text
  • Statistical support for study conclusions, claims
    and indications
  • Description of study results, summary statistics
    and inferential language
  • Information in tables and figures

17
Labeling Example 1 Statistical Input Provided
CLINICAL STUDIES The NAGLAZYME-treated group
showed greater mean increases in the distance
walked in 12 minutes (12-minute walk test,
12-MWT) and in the rate of stair climbing in a
3-minute stair climb, compared to the placebo
group (Table 2).
18
Labeling Example 2 Statistical Input Needed
  • Proposed text The combination of A and B is
    effective in lowering LDL-C levels beyond that
    achieved by either agent alone.
  • Statistical issue The study was not designed to
    support this conclusion. The study had two arms,
    (AB) combination product, and A monotherapy.

19
Labeling Example 3 Statistical Input Needed
  • Proposed table The symbol was used for
    plt0.05, and was used to indicate no
    statistically significant difference between the
    active treatment arm and the placebo arm.
  • Statistical issue This is not a typical way to
    depict this outcome and may be confusing to some
    readers.

20
Suggestions from CDER Statisticians(Labeling)
  • Provide your statistical perspective in the
    development of labeling text.
  • Labeling Guidance, 2006
  • Clinical Studies Section
  • Adverse Reactions Section

21
Improving Statistical Communication
Industry
  • Provide statistical input at all stages
  • Ask good questions
  • Provide detailed, timely information
  • Address critical statistical issues

22
Acknowledgments
  • FDA Statisticians from
  • Divisions of Biometrics 1, Biometrics 2,
    Biometrics 3, Biometrics 4, and Biometrics 5
  • Industry Statisticians /Programmers
  • for their promptness in responding to FDA
    questions!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com