Fuzzy logic based congestion control - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Fuzzy logic based congestion control

Description:

Andreas Pitsillides, Department of Computer Science, University of Cyprus. 1 ... ( Need for gateway control realised early; e.g. see [Jacobson, 1988], where for ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:644
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: andreaspi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fuzzy logic based congestion control


1
Fuzzy logic based congestion control
  • Andreas Pitsillides,
  • Department of Computer Science
  • University of Cyprus

Ahmet Sekercioglu, Department of Informatics
Swinburne University of Technology
2
Congestion control problem
  • Generally accepted that
  • network congestion control remains critical issue
    and high priority, especially given growing size,
    demand, and speed (bandwidth) of the increasingly
    integrated services networks.
  • Despite research efforts spanning few decades
    and large number of different schemes proposed,
  • no universally acceptable control solutions in
    fight against congestion (a control strategy, a
    control system, or a package of control
    solutions).
  • Current solutions in existing networks
  • increasingly becoming ineffective, and
  • generally accepted that these cannot easily scale
    up even with various proposed fixes.

3
congestion
  • Definition
  • network state in which performance degrades due
    to saturation of network resources,
    (communication links, network switches, processor
    cycles, and memory buffers).
  • E.g. if communication link delivers packets to
    queue at higher rate than its service rate, then
    size of queue grows. If queue space finite then
    in addition to delay, losses occur
  • Control
  • refers to set of actions taken by network to
    minimise intensity, spread, and duration of
    congestion.
  • optimal control of networks of queues
  • well-known, much studied, and notoriously
    difficult problem, even for simplest of cases.
    E.g. Papathemetriou and Tsitsiklis show problem
    of optimally controlling simple network of queues
    with simple arrival and service distributions and
    multiple customer classes is complete for
    exponential time (i.e. provably intractable).

4
Congestion control
  • effect of network congestion is degradation in
    the network performance.
  • user experiences long delays in delivery of
    messages, perhaps with heavy losses caused by
    buffer overflows.
  • Thus degradation in quality of delivered service,
    with need for retransmissions of packets (for
    services intolerant to loss). In event of
    retransmissions, drop in throughput, eventually
    leading to network throughput collapse.
  • Congestion is a complex process to define.
  • felt by degradation of performance.
  • loss, delay and throughput deterioration good
    indicators of congestion.
  • A good congestion control system should be
    preventive, if possible. Otherwise should react
    quickly and minimise spread of congestion and its
    duration.

5
Congestion can be sensed (or predicted) by
  • packet loss
  • sensed by the queue as an overflow,
  • sensed by destination (through sequence number)
    and acknowledged to a user,
  • sensed by sender due to lack of acknowledgment
    (timeout mechanism) to indicate loss
  • packet delay
  • can be inferred by the queue size,
  • observed by destination and acknowledged to user
    (e.g. with time stamps in packet headers)
  • observed by sender, e.g. by packet probe to
    measure Round Trip Time (RTT)
  • loss of throughput
  • observed by the sender queue size(waiting time in
    queue)
  • other calculated or observed event through which
    congestion can be inferred
  • increased network queue length and its growth
  • calculated from measured data, e.g queue inflow
    and its effect on future queue behaviour.

6
potential problems of control
  • Large scale
  • Distributed nature
  • Large geographic spread (at its limit it covers
    globe)
  • Increasingly processing delay at nodes gets
    smaller, in comparison to propagation delay in
    links. Large-bandwidth delay product makes
    control of congestion through feedback
    potentially difficult
  • Diverse nature and behaviour of carried traffic
    (voice, video, www, ftp, e-mail, .)
  • Unpredictable and time varying user behaviour
  • Lack of appropriate dynamic models for control
  • Expectation of the need for guaranteed levels of
    performance to each user, which can be negotiated
    with the network

7
(lack of) modelling of network system
  • To design control system necessary to model input
    and output cause and effect of system.
  • difficulty of deriving such model
  • Several factors affect model, and some are time
    varying. Take model of traffic behaviour as
    example
  • diverse user (human) behavior affects way traffic
    is generated (can be time varying and different
    for different humans, even for same interactive
    services).
  • inherent fuzzines, e.g, in
  • definition of contract between user and network
    and its policing,
  • in the controls (declared objectives of controls
    and observed behaviour of the system).
  • Data generation, organisation and retrieval (long
    range dependance shown for both source
    generation, as well as storage of data)
  • Traffic aggregation process is a very complex
    onestudies suggest self-similarity preserved
    under variety of network operations and network
    conditions
  • Network controls (speculation that fractal
    features in network traffic remain even after
    network controls).
  • Network evolution (self-similarity appears robust
    to network changes, eg. upgrades).

8
control theoretic concepts
  • Making use of control theoretic concepts has
    potential benefits, including
  • Simpler an/or more effective algorithms with more
    predictable properties.
  • Better understanding of performance of controlled
    system (including dynamic behaviour).
  • Better understanding of existing non-linear
    algorithms, including need for any fixes
    (jacketing software).
  • Better analysis techniques for large systems of
    interacting algorithms.
  • A major difficulty in control system design is to
    reconcile the large-scale, fuzzy, real problems
    with the simple well-define problems that control
    theory can typically handle
  • good understanding of fundamental control theory
    (which can be sophisticated and complex), as well
    as deep understanding of system under control
    (not necessarily in form of accurate mathematical
    model).

9
Existing approaches to congestion control and
trends
  • For historical reasons, and due to fundamental
    philosophical differences earlier approach to
    congestion control, differed between TCP/IP and
    ATM
  • However some convergence between classical TCP/IP
    and ATM approach evident, (RFC2309, RFC2481, ATM
    Forum).
  • become clear that existing TCP congestion
    avoidance mechanisms (RFC2001), while necessary
    and powerful, not sufficient.
  • Basically, there is a limit as to how much
    control can be accomplished from edges of network
  • Some mechanisms needed in routers to complement
    endpoint congestion avoidance mechanisms. (Need
    for gateway control realised early e.g. see
    Jacobson, 1988, where for future work gateway
    side advocated as necessary).
  • Evolutionary, for TCP/IP and ATM we see
  • progressive shift of controls from edges of
    network (initially open loop then edge binary
    feedback) to inside network. Feedback also
    shifting from implicit to explicit, from pure
    binary to multivalued and explicit.

10
Network controls
  • network system
  • large distributed complex system, with difficult
    often highly non-linear, time varying and chaotic
    behaviour.
  • inherent fuzziness in definition of controls
    (declared objectives and observed behaviour).
  • Dynamic or static modelling of such system for
    (open or closed loop) control is extremely
    complex.
  • Measurements on the state of the network are
    incomplete, often relatively poor and time
    delayed.
  • Its sheer numerical size and geographic spread
    are mind-boggling. E.g. customers (active
    services) in 10s of millions, network elements in
    100s of million, and global coverage.
  • Computational intelligence to handle complexity
    and fuzziness present in network system surely
    has an essential role to play here. We should
    exploit tolerance for imprecision and uncertainty
    to achieve tractability, robustness and low cost

11
Computational Intelligence (CI)
  • area of fundamental and applied research
    involving numerical information processing (in
    contrast to symbolic information processing
    techniques of Artificial Intelligence (AI)).
  • Nowadays, CI research is very active and
    consequently its applications are appearing in
    some end user products.
  • definition of CI can be given indirectly by
    observing the exhibited properties of a system
    that employs CI components
  • A system is computationally intelligent when it
    deals only with numerical (low-level) data, has a
    pattern recognition component, and does not use
    knowledge in the AI sense and additionally, when
    it (begins to) exhibit
  • computational adaptivity
  • computational fault tolerance
  • speed approaching human-like turnaround
  • error rates that approximate human performance.
  • The major building blocks of CI are artificial
    neural networks, fuzzy logic, and evolutionary
    computation.

12
Fuzzy Explicit Rate Marking (FERM) for congestion
control
  • Basic idea
  • measure queue length and queue growth rates
    (hence providing rudimentary prediction of future
    behaviour) at the output buffer of a switch,
  • calculate and send explicit rate control signals
    to traffic sources to avoid or alleviate
    congestion.
  • explicit rate control signals calculated
    periodically by fuzzy inference engines located
    in switches, and sent to traffic sources in
    resource management (RM) cells.
  • analyzed and compared performance of FERM with
    EPRCA in detail regarding fairness,
    responsiveness, resource utilization and cell
    loss in LAN and WAN environments. FERM has been
    further refined (FERM2) and as an adaptive scheme
    which has self tuning capabilities (A-FERM).

13
FERM2 explicit rate congestion control scheme
  • Note desired queue length is explicit, can be
    set by a higher level control module to provide
    more dynamic resource utilization across switches
    utilised by VC

14
FERM 2 Operation
  • Overall operation compliant with ATM Forum
    Traffic Management Specification, Version 4.
  • Source Cell rates adjusted by Explicit Rate (ER)
    carried by RM cells.
  • RM cells periodically generated by traffic
    sources, transmitted towards destination end
    systems, and initial ER information is set by the
    ICR.
  • Destination end systems bounce RM cells back to
    sources.
  • During return path, when RM cell passes through
    ATM switch, its ER value is examined and possibly
    modified.
  • Data source, upon receiving RM cell, adjust cell
    rate ER. If ERgtPCR, cell ratePCR. Similarly,
    cell rateMCR if ERltMCR.
  • ER provided to all active VCs at all time so
    congestion and undesired resulting behavior can
    be avoided.
  • does not need to keep state of current VC
    connections sharing switch.
  • Periodical ER calculations are performed by the
    Fuzzy Congestion Controllers (FCCs) located in
    each ATM switch.

15
implementation of FCC
  • Chosen most widely used and computationally
    lighter methods, which are
  • singleton fuzzification
  • t-norm algebraic product for the mathematical
    representation of the connective and
  • Larsen's product rule of implication
  • sup-product compositional rule of inference
  • weighted mean of maximums defuzzification.

16
Control surface
if queue length and queue then flow rate
too short decreasing fast increase
sharply slowly
moderately not
changing
increasing slowly decrease moderately
fast
acceptable decreasing
fast increase moderately
slowly
not changing no
change increasing slowly
decrease moderately increasing
fast too high
decreasing fast no change
slowly
not changing decrease moderately
increasing slowly
sharply fast

Set of linguistic rules defining the control
surface of the FCC
17
network model for performance analysis
simulation of ATM WAN (1500 km between switches)
backbone and LAN backbone (10 km)
Real time sources
ABR sources 3-hop
10/1500 km
ABR sources 1-hop
18
simulated ATM LAN under FERM2 congestion control
average end-to-end ABR cell delay vs. useful
throughput
19
simulated ATM WAN under FERM2 congestion control
average end-to-end ABR cell delay vs. useful
throughput
20
Time evolution of Explicit Rate for case of LAN
calculated by the FCC
21
Time evolution of the queue length for the case
of a LAN. Note that the reference value set at
400 cell places.
22
Time evolution of Explicit Rate for the case of
the WAN calculated by the FCC
23
Time evolution of the queue length for the case
of a WAN. Note that the reference value is set at
400 cell places.
24
Conclusions and recommendations
  • congestion control in communication networks is a
    real challenge, especially supporting video,
    voice and data applications simultaneously.
  • Computational Intelligence techniques expected to
    play central role, especially in large scale,
    geographically distributed network systems.
    Hybrids also expected to supplement these
    techniques and prove useful, especially in
    optimising overall network objectives.
  • challenges include
  • Agreement on structured approach to congestion
    control for network. Control theoretic concepts
    and techniques have essential role to play.
  • Engineer network system with network control
    system together in order to add another degree of
    flexibility.
  • Theoretical advances in handling large scale
    complex systems are required, including
    decomposition and organisation of controls.
  • Globally optimise overall network objectives.
  • Agreement in common simulative framework and
    common test bed framework for testing congestion
    control algorithms
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com