Title: Socioeconomic WellBeing of Washington State: Who Attends Community and Technical Colleges
1Socioeconomic Well-Being of Washington State
Who Attends Community and Technical Colleges
House Higher Education Committee January 22,
2007 Washington State Board for Community and
Technical Colleges
2A Census Based Proxy for Student Socioeconomic
Status and Income
- Based on census data for income, education (BA or
higher) and occupation (professional/managerial) - Student address matched to census
- Student assigned average and household income SES
for area mapped
3Washington State Socioeconomic Status Quintiles
1990 and 2000
4Race still matters
5Our colleges mirror the state - providing access
and opportunity for all
6Young adults in low SES quintiles are less likely
to go directly to college than those in high SES
quintiles.
- Young adults (18-24 yrs old) from the two lowest
income households are less likely to go directly
to college than young people in middle and higher
income households. - Instead low income people come to college when
they are older (25 years). - Typically they come for job skills training and
re-training. Often they begin in basic skills
programs. - This trend rate is increasing.
7Participation for Younger and Older Students by
SES Quintiles - 2000
8The issue is more compelling when we consider
that more than ever before our future adults are
being born and raised in low SES households.
9Students socioeconomic differences magnified by
college communities
10AffordabilityTuition hikes vs. growth in
household income
- Tuition increases on average have outpaced
household income growth more than 21 between
1989 and 2005. - Tuition as percent of income ranges from 6.5 for
lowest income households to 1.5 for highest.
11It is reasonable to presume that increasing
tuition is having an effect on students
- Younger Students (18-24 years old) in lower SES
households - median income just under 40K, may
be the tip of the iceberg for families that feel
the strain. - We dont know if it is due to actual costs,
perceptions of cost, or perceived benefits vs.
cost.
12Conclusions
- The question to ask about participation is not
only who, but when. - The social policy question we need to keep asking
is, Do the children from every socioeconomic
level in our state have the same opportunities to
prepare for and go directly to college? - Next step - student outcomes and socioeconomic
status
13Statewide Strategies
- Vision Raise educational attainment for all
- Opportunity Grants
- Financial aid for low income working adults
- Freeze tuition, analysis, propose policy
- Integrated basic skills and workforce education
IBEST - Transfer pathways for technical degree graduates
14Acknowledgements
- The State Board for Community Colleges wishes to
thank the Ford Foundations Bridges to
Opportunity Program, Columbia Universitys
Community College Research Center, and the
Washington State College Spark Foundation for
their support for this project. - Full report available at http//www.sbctc.ctc.edu/
college/d_socioeconomicstudy.aspx