Design for Reliability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Design for Reliability

Description:

Product Lifecycle Management Center of Excellence. Butler County Community College ... passenger car, but it virtually '0' for use at the Daytona 500 stock car race. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: brandon82
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Design for Reliability


1
Design for Reliability
Unit 3 Defining Reliability
Mike Robinson CMfgE, CQE Natural Science
Technology Manufacturing Technology
2
Introduction
  • While there is no universally accepted definition
    of reliability, there are key elements,
    including probability, performance, operating
    conditions, and time.
  • First and foremost, reliability is the
    probability that a part or system will
    successfully complete its mission.
  • For most products, the time-to-failure in the
    constant failure rate portion of the bathtub
    curve can be represented by the exponential
    distribution.
  • Generalized formulas exist for the calculation of
    quantitative reliability metrics.

3
Definition of Reliability
  • There is no universal definition of
    reliability.
  • But all definitions in use share common
    elements.
  • One definition (based on IEEE-90)

The probability that a system or component will
perform its required function under stated
conditions for a specified period of time.
4
Definition of Reliability - Probability
  • Reliability is first and foremost defined as a
    probability
  • A numerical value between 0 and 1 (unity).
  • The ability to express reliability in numerical
    terms allows for the direct comparison between
    different design alternatives for products.
  • For example, a reliability of 0.97 indicates
    that, on average, 97 of 100 items will perform
    their intended function for a given period of
    time under given operating conditions.

5
Example Reliability as a Probability
Applying this definition, the reliability of a
standard equipment automobile tire is essentially
1 for 10,000 miles of normal operation on a
typical passenger car, but it virtually 0 for
use at the Daytona 500 stock car race.
Reliability 0
Reliability 1
6
Definition of Reliability - Performance
  • Performance is the second element of the
    definition and refers to the object for which the
    product or system was designed.
  • The term failure is used when the expectations
    of performance are not met.

A failure can be defined as any incident that
prevents the mission from being accomplished, or
any incident requires unscheduled maintenance.
http//todayinspacehistory.wordpress.com/category/
tragedy/
7
Example Hard Disk Drive Performance
Maxtor Atlas 10K V 75GB HDD
http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ImageHard_disk_platt
er_reflection.jpg
1.4 Million Hour Mean Time to Failure (MTTF)
http//www.darklab.rutgers.edu/MERCURY/t15/disk.pd
f
8
Definition of Reliability Operating Conditions
  • The third aspect of the definition is operating
    conditions, which involves the type and amount
    of usage and the environment in which the product
    or system is used.
  • Operating conditions include such considerations
    as operating temperatures, storage temperatures,
    altitude, humidity, chemical exposure, shock,
    vibration, transportation/handling.
  • Reliability often must include extreme conditions
    in addition to ambient environments.

9
Example Hard Disk Drive Operating Conditions
Maxtor Atlas 10K V 75GB HDD
http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ImageHard_disk_platt
er_reflection.jpg
1.4 Million Hour Mean Time to Failure (MTTF)
http//www.darklab.rutgers.edu/MERCURY/t15/disk.pd
f
10
Definition of Reliability - Time
  • The final aspect of the definition of reliability
    is time.
  • All products must operate for a given lifetime.
  • While long life is typically a design
    requirement, some products only need to operate
    for a relatively short time frame (ie., Mars
    rovers)
  • Clearly, a device having a reliability of 0.97
    for 1,000 hours of operations is inferior to one
    having the same reliability for 5,000 hours,
    assuming that the mission of the device is long
    operating life.

11
Example Time
Mars Rover
Cardiac Pacemaker
http//www.techshout.com/science
http//www.heartzine.com/
High Reliability over Long Time Period
High Reliability over Relatively Short Time
Period
12
Failure Distribution
  • In most cases, the distribution of failure times
    follows the classic bathtub curve.
  • Frequently in the reliability evaluation of an
    item, only the middle portion of the bathtub
    curve is taken into consideration. It is in this
    portion that the failure rate is essentially
    constant.

http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathtub_curve
13
Mathematical Basis of Reliability
  • The mathematics of reliability is based in
    probability theory, which deals with the
    uncertainty of random events.
  • In most reliability applications, we are dealing
    with quantitative measures such the
    time-to-failure of a part, where the random
    variable is time ( t ).
  • Because a product can be found failed at any time
    after time 0 (i.e. at 12.4 hours or at 100.12
    hours, etc.), the random variable (time) can take
    on any value in this range. In this case, the
    random variable is said to be a continuous random
    variable.

14
Mathematical Basis of Reliability
  • All random events (including failures) have an
    underlying probability function.
  • Given a continuous random variable, we denote
  • the probability density function (pdf) as f(t),
    and
  • the cumulative distribution function (cdf) as
    F(t).
  • The pdf and cdf give a complete description of
    the probability distribution of the random
    variable.

15
The Exponential Function
  • The majority of reliability (failure rate)
    prediction standards assume that the underlying
    distribution of failures is exponential.
  • Even if individual components fail according to
    other distributions, in a long run, the
    successive times of a repairable series system
    follows the exponential distribution.
  • The exponential function is NOT the normal
    distribution (bell curve) that most people are
    familiar with.

16
The Probability Density Function
  • The probability density function (pdf) of the
    exponential function is given generically as
  • f(x) ?e -?x x 0
  • where ? is the parameter.
  • For reliability applications, the parameter is
    the constant failure rate of the item (?) and the
    random variable ( x ) is operating time.

17
The Probability Density Function
The Probability Density Function (pdf) of the
Exponential Function
f(x) ?e - ?x x 0
Probability Density (frequency of occurrence)
Continuous Variable
18
The Cumulative Density Function
  • The cumulative density function (cdf) of the
    exponential function is given as
  • F(x) 1 - e -?x x 0
  • where ? is the parameter.
  • For reliability applications, the parameter is
    the constant failure rate of the item (?) and the
    random variable ( x ) is operating time.

19
The Cumulative Density Function
The Cumulative Density Function (cdf) of the
Exponential Function
F(x) 1 - e - ?x x 0
Probability Of Failure
Continuous Variable
http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_distribut
ion.
20
Quantifying Reliability
  • The reliability (probability of mission success
    for a given operating time) is mathematically
    derived from the exponential distributions pdf
    and cdf
  • Reliability R(t) e -?t
    t 0
  • Using this simple formula, the numerical
    reliability for any amount of operating time can
    be calculated if the constant failure rate (? )
    is known.

21
Quantifying Failure Probability (Unreliability)
  • Similarly, the unreliability (the probability of
    failure during a given operating time) can be
    expressed as
  • Unreliability P(t) 1 - e -?t
    t 0

22
Mean Time Between Failures
  • The expected value of the time to failure of a
    non-repairable system is known as the Mean Time
    to Failure (MTTF).
  • If the equipment is repairable, the expected
    value of the time between repaired failures is
    commonly described as Mean Time Between Failure
    (MTBF).

23
Mean Time Between Failures
  • Thus, the mean waiting time between successive
    failures can be found by the fraction
  • or the reciprocal of the constant failure
    rate.
  • Thus, reliability can be defined in terms of the
    average or mean time a device or item will
    operate without failure, or the average time
    between failures for a repairable item.

24
Mean Time Between Failures
  • Like any mean or average value, the MTTF or MTBF
    of a particular system is an average and it is
    unlikely that the actual time before a failure
    occurs will exactly equal the MTTF.
  • Over a very long time or for a very large number
    of systems, the times to failure will average out
    to the MTTF. The MTTF is neither a minimum value
    nor a simple arithmetic average.
  • If we impose the condition that every time a
    repairable item fails we restore it completely
    (back to the t 0 state), MTTF and MTBF can be
    used interchangeably.

25
Summary
  • While there is no universally accepted definition
    of reliability, there are key elements,
    including
  • probability,
  • performance,
  • operating conditions, and
  • time
  • First and foremost, reliability is the
    probability that a part or system will
    successfully complete its mission.
  • The mathematics of reliability is based in
    probability theory, which deals with the
    uncertainty of random events.

26
Summary
  • Constant failure rates are assumed to exist
    during the useful life portion of the bathtub
    curve.
  • The majority of reliability (failure rate)
    prediction standards assume that the underlying
    distribution of failures during this period of
    time is exponential.
  • Reliability is quantified using the exponential
    distribution function and is a function of the
    constant failure rate and time.
  • The mean waiting time between successive failures
    is equivalent to the reciprocal of the constant
    failure rate.

27
References
  •  
  •  

National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) Engineering Statistics Handbook.
Retrieved in December 2007 from
http//www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/ IEEE
90 Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers. IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary A
Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries.
New York, NY 1990. Operating specification
for Maxtor Atlas 10KV Ultra 320 Hard Disk Drive.
Retrieved in January 2008 from
http//www.darklab.rutgers.edu/MERCURY/t15/disk.pd
f. US Army TM 5-698-1, Reliability/Availability
of Electrical Mechanical Systems for Command,
Control, Communications, Computer, Intelligence,
Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C4ISR)
Facilities. US Army Corps of Engineers -
Technical Manuals). Retrieved in January 2008
from http//www.usace.army.mil/publications/armyt
m/tm5-698-1/a-b.pdf.
28
References
  •  
  •  

Exponential Distribution. Retrieved in January
2008 from http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentia
l_distribution. Kales, Paul. Reliability for
Technology, Engineering and Management. Upper
Saddle River Prentice Hall, 1998. Neubeck,
Ken. Practical Reliability Analysis. Upper
Saddle River Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.
29
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to acknowledge the support from
the National Science Foundation Advanced
Technology Education Program, NSF Grant 0603362
for Midwest Coalition for Comprehensive Design
Education.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com