Status report of the L2Cal upgrade for the L2Cal team Chicago, Fermilab, Madrid, Padova, Penn, Pisa, Purdue - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Status report of the L2Cal upgrade for the L2Cal team Chicago, Fermilab, Madrid, Padova, Penn, Pisa, Purdue

Description:

Observe large increase of jet/met based trigger cross sections ... New PCs (2-dual core AMD opteron processors; Gentoo 2006.1 & gcc 4.1.1) Threaded software ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: anadic
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Status report of the L2Cal upgrade for the L2Cal team Chicago, Fermilab, Madrid, Padova, Penn, Pisa, Purdue


1
Status report of theL2Cal upgradefor the L2Cal
team Chicago, Fermilab, Madrid, Padova, Penn,
Pisa, Purdue
2
Motivation
  • Observe large increase of jet/met based trigger
    cross sections
  • Reach limit of available bandwidth
  • Efficiency of multi-jet triggers decreases
  • Cause ?
  • (True/fake) jets merged together
  • Low ET jets promoted to high ET jets
  • Multi-jet events ? single jet events
  • Temporary solution
  • PS or DPS
  • Long term solution
  • Modification of the L2 calorimeter trigger

Project approved on September 14th 2006 As vital
for preserving and improving the sensitivity for
Higgs searches
3
System Overview
  • Current Pacman
  • uses 8-bit resolution for tower energies
  • finds a seed (gt 3 GeV) from lowest ??
  • attaches any shoulder (gt 1 GeV)
  • defines cluster centroid as lowest ??
  • How can we improve ?
  • Calorimeter trigger tower information available
    to the L2 Decision with 10 bit resolution
  • New algorithm in L2 CPU
  • Jet clustering (cone based)
  • Met calculation
  • Install parallel L2CAL hardware path
  • to be tested in fully parasitic mode

4
Hardware Configuration
Muon XTRP L1 SVT XCES
Global L2 Decision
New Hardware path
  • Set of Pulsar boards to
  • receive,
  • preprocess
  • merge
  • send to L2 decision CPU

8-bits
10-bits
Calorimeter
5
Pulsar Setup
  • SERIALIZER
  • Filar boards are interface between SLINK and PC
  • RECEIVERS
  • Mezzanine cards are interface with LVDS cable

7 ?s (132 towers X2)
144 cables
Pulsar Merger
144 cables
12 ?s (312 towers)
SLINK 32-bit _at_ 40 MHz
6
Clustering Software
  • Ouline of clustering
  • Orders trigger towers in ET (using min ET 0.125
    GeV)
  • Cluster ET in code around the seed ET gt ET,MIN
    GeV ( ?R 0.7)
  • Flag towers as used
  • Sort clusters in ET (max 20)
  • Cluster ? and ? are weighted by ET

7
Clustering Pass
Pass 0 Seed 2 GeV
Pass 0 Shoulder 1 GeV
Pass 0 One tower per cluster One tower per cluster
Pass 1 Seed 8 GeV
Pass 1 Shoulder 7.5 GeV
Pass 2 Seed 3 GeV
Pass 2 Shoulder 1 GeV
Pass 4 (alpha) Seed From Pass 1 Had/Em lt 0.125
Pass 4 (alpha) Energy from Pass 0 Had/Em lt 0.125 Central 1? wedge ?1 ? wedge Plug 3 x 3 box No crossing in ? Energy from Pass 0 Had/Em lt 0.125 Central 1? wedge ?1 ? wedge Plug 3 x 3 box No crossing in ?
  • New Clustering Algorithm
  • Pass 0 not changed
  • Pass 1 replaced by Pass 4
  • Pass 2 cone based NEW
  • Pass 4 not changed
  • New Isolation Algorithm
  • Starts from the seed position
  • Finds iso 3x3 and (4)3x4
  • Uses the smallest of the 5 sums
  • Calculated for Pass 1

8
FER Monitoring put
  • Modification of the FER code
  • Needed for backward compatibility
  • Energy of towers retrieved from Dirac and print
    out in TC2D format
  • New temporary bank TUPD
  • Will replace the TC2D from DCAS when DCAS removed
  • Monitoring of the cable occupancy and real E vs
    simulated one

G.Cortiana
9
Timing performances
?t between L1A and the arrival of first fragment
to the L2TS
  • Optimization
  • Hardware
  • Pulsar setup
  • Data volume reduced by sending 3 20-bit towers in
    2 32-bit words
  • Exploit LUT for tower position
  • Other possibilities, zero suppression
  • Software
  • New PCs (2-dual core AMD opteron processors
    Gentoo 2006.1 gcc 4.1.1)
  • Threaded software
  • Clustering 5 ?s (on demand)

D.Krop
Low luminosity data Unbiased (previous) events
10
Commissioning
  • Hardware
  • All in place and tested
  • Interface Software
  • Code for decision interface, finalized
  • ready to build trigger tables for L2Cal
  • Clustering Software
  • Finalized
  • FER Monitoring
  • Almost finalized
  • System successfully run in parasitic mode
  • at the end of store and in between stores
  • Next, compare decision between main and upgraded
    system
  • (Pass 0 and Pass 4 expected to be identical)

11
Summary
  • The L2Cal upgrade is close to completion
  • (scheduled by end of May)
  • Cone based clustering is performed at L2
  • MET is calculated with 10 bit full resolution
  • With the new L2 Calorimeter,
  • better estimate of MET
  • better estimate of the cluster E location
  • improve efficiency ? improve acceptance
  • rate reduction in jet/met based trigger
  • Could implement dijet mass cut, angular cuts, SVT
    matching, isolation, etc.

M.Schmidt
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com