ProblemSolving Tools - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 55
About This Presentation
Title:

ProblemSolving Tools

Description:

Items identified and ordered on common scale in decreasing ... lines assembly; leave disassembly. Materials: left horizontal lines assembly; right disassembly ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 56
Provided by: nathan80
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ProblemSolving Tools


1
Chapter 2
  • Problem-Solving Tools

2
Exploratory Tools
  • Pareto Analysis
  • Fish Diagrams
  • Gantt Chart
  • PERT Chart
  • Job / Worksite Analysis Guide

3
Pareto Analysis
  • Items identified and ordered on common scale in
    decreasing frequency, creating a cumulative
    distribution
  • 80/20 Rule 20 of the items account for 80 of
    the problems
  • Allows the company to concentrate resources on
    the jobs with the most problems

4
Pareto Analysis
5
Fish-bone Diagrams
  • Cause-and-effect diagrams
  • Identified problem or undesirable result is the
    head
  • Contributing factors are the bones
  • Typical categories include Human, machine,
    methods, materials, environment, and
    administrative
  • Estimates associated probabilities

6
Fish-bone Diagrams
7
Gantt Chart
  • Used for planning of complex projects
  • Shows expected start and completion times, also
    duration of events
  • Similarly, major events can be broken into
    smaller sub-tasks
  • Shade the bars to show actual completion time

8
Gantt Chart
  • Example Diagram

9
PERT Chart
  • Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) is
    a planning and control tool
  • Also known as Network Diagram or Critical Path
  • Graphically portrays the optimum way to obtain a
    desired objective with respects to time
  • Optimistic, average, and pessimistic time
    estimates utilized

10
Critical Path Method
  • Critical path the longest path
  • A job (i,j) is non-critical if (LCj-ESi)gtDij
  • Forward path calculate ESi maxESiDij, ?i
  • Backward path LCi minLCj-Dij, ? j
  • Where Dij is job(i,j) duration ES0
    Earliest start time at the beginning node (node
    0) LCnESn, latest completion time at the
    end node n
  • An activity (i,j) lies on the critical path
    if ESiLCi ESjLCj ESj-ESiLCj-L
    CiDij

11
Example of PERT Chart
12
Illustrative Calculations
  • Forward calculations
  • ES1 0
  • ES2 maxES1 D1,2 max044
  • ES3 maxES1 D1,3 max022
  • ES4 maxES1 D1,4 max033
  • ES5 maxES2 D2,5 ES3 D3,5 max41257
  • ..
  • ES12 LC12 27
  • Backward calculations
  • LC11 min LC12 D11,12 min 27 -2 25
  • LC10 min LC11 D10,11 min 25 -1 24
  • LC9 min LC12 D9,12 LC10 D9,10 min 27
    -4 24-4 20
  • .
  • LC1 0
  • Critical jobs identification
  • Job A ES1 LC1 0 (satisfied)
  • ES2 ? LC2 (not satisfied) ? job A is
    non-critical job
  • Job B ES1 LC1 0 (satisfied)
  • ES3 ? LC3 (not satisfied) ? job B is
    non-critical job

13
Job / Worksite Analysis Guide
  • Identify problems within a particular area,
    department, worksite
  • Perform a walkthrough observing the area, worker,
    task, environment, administrative constraints,
    etcbefore collecting data
  • Develop an overall perspective of the situation
  • Particularly useful in workstation redesign

14
Job / Worksite Analysis Guide
  • Example Guide

15
Recording and Analysis Tools
  • Operation Process Chart
  • Flow Process Chart
  • Flow Diagram
  • Worker and Machine Process Charts
  • Gang Process Charts

16
Operation Process Chart
  • of all operations,
    inspections, time allowances, materials
  • Depicts of all
    components and sub-assemblies and products
  • Provides information on the
    , required for jobs and
    inspections
  • Construction
  • Circle operation
  • Square inspection
  • Vertical lines processes horizontal lines
    material
  • Parts enter vertical lines ? assembly leave ?
    disassembly
  • Materials left horizontal lines ? assembly
    right? disassembly
  • Time values ? operations, inspections

17
(No Transcript)
18
Operation Process Chart
  • Example Diagram

19
Flow Process Chart
  • More detailed, fit for closer observation of
    components or assemblies
  • Shows all (distances) and storage
    (times) for product movement in plant
  • Aids in the of hidden costs
  • Can be beneficial for
    suggestions
  • Types product/material, operative/person
  • Construction
  • Symbol ? step move
  • Start, end store
  • Numbers ? symbols
  • Diagonal lines join the symbols ? flow
  • Additional column additional information
  • The summary section at the top of the form

20
(No Transcript)
21
Flow Process Chart
  • Example Diagram

22
Flow Diagram
  • Pictorial representation of the
  • Good supplement to the Flow Process Chart
  • Construction
  • The symbols/numbers activity ?corresponding to
    those appearing on the flow process chart
  • The flow ? charted ? movement of a single object
    is being followed

23
Flow Diagram
  • Example Diagram

24
Worker and Machine Process Charts
  • Used to study, analyze, and improve
    workstation
  • operator serve machines
  • Shows the time relationship between working cycle
    of and the operating cycle of the
  • Reveals for both machines and workers

25
Worker and Machine Process Charts
  • Example Diagram

26
Gang Process Chart
  • An adaptation of Worker and Machine chart
  • workers serve machine
  • Shows and of machine and
    workers ? reduce idle operator time and idle
    machine time

27
Gang Process Chart
  • Example Diagram

28
Gang Process Chart
29
Quantitative Tools
  • Three types of a worker and machine relationship
  • Synchronous servicing
  • Completely random servicing
  • Combinations of random and synchronous servicing
  • Line balancing

30
Synchronous Servicing
  • Assigning more than one machine to an operator
  • Where
  • N number of machines assigned to operator
  • l service time per machine (load and unload)
  • m machine running time

31
Synchronous Servicing
32
Synchronous Servicing
  • When N is not an integer number ? round up idle
    machine, round down idle worker ? justify ? ?
    use the of the product as a guideline
  • Estimate the number of machines assigned to the
    operator
  • Where w total worker time (not directly
    interacting with the machine, e.g. walking time
    to the next machine)
  • Calculate total expected cost of production per
    cycle from one machine
  • Where K1 operator rate (/unit time)
  • K2 cost of machine (/unit time)
  • N N1 ? cycle_time (l m)
  • N N2 ? cycle_time N2(l w)

33
Machine Idle Time and Worker Idle Time
W M1 M2 M3
W M1 M2 M3 M4
w l
w l
Cycle_time l m
m
Cycle time N2(lw)
m
Worker idle time
Machine idle time
N N2
N N1
34
Synchronous Servicing Example
  • It takes an operator 1 to service a machine and
    0.1 to walk to the next machine. Each machine
    runs automatically for 3, the operator earns
    10/h and the machine cost 20/h to run. How many
    machines can the operator service?

35
Synchronous Servicing Example
  • It takes an operator 1 to service a machine and
    0.1 to walk to the next machine. Each machine
    runs automatically for 3, the operator earns
    10/h and the machine cost 20/h to run. How many
    machines can the operator service?
  • Solution
  • Estimate the number of machines assigned to the
    operator N (lm)/(lw) 3.6 ?N1 3 and N2
    4
  • With N1 3 TEC1 (lm)(K1 N1K2)/N1
    (13)/60( )/3
    1.556/unit
  • With N2 4 TEC2 (lw)(K1 N2K2)

    (10.1)(10 x20)/60 1.65/unit

36
An Alternative Solution
  • With N1 3
  • The production rate per hour
    45units/hr
  • The expected cost TEC1 (K1 N1K2)/R

    (103x20)/45 1.556/unit
  • With N2 4
  • The production rate per hour
    54.54 units/hr
  • The expected cost TEC2 (K1 N2K2)/R

    (104x20)/54.54 1.65/unit
  • If l 0.9 (10 decrease in loading /unloading
    time), what will the result be affected?
  • R increase 10 (from 54.54 to 60 units/hr)
  • TEC decrease 3.6 (from 1.556 to 1.5/unit)
  • A reduction of idle time from 0.7 min for the
    operator
  • Check?

37
Random Servicing
  • The case when
  • Do not know when the machine needs to be serviced
  • How long the service takes ?
  • The probability of M (out of N) machines down
  • Total expected cost
  • Where K1 hourly rate of operator
  • K2 hourly rate of machine
  • N number of machines assigned
  • R rate of production (units from N
    machine/hour)

38
Random Servicing
39
Random Servicing Example
  • An operator is assigned to service 3 machines
    that have an expected downtime of 40. When
    running, each machine can produce 60 units/h. The
    operator is paid 10/h, and a machine costs 60/h
    to run. Is it worth hiring another operator to
    keep the machines running?
  • Solution
  • One operator
  • machine down (n) probability machine hour
    lost/8-hr day
  • 0 0.216
    0
  • 1 0.432 0
  • 2 0.288 0.288x8 2.304
  • 3 0.064 0.064x16 1.024

  • Total 3.328
  • Total production time
    - 3.328 20.672 (hours)
  • Total number of products to be produced 20.672
    x60 12430.3 units.
  • Average rate 1240.3/(8) 155.04 ?TEC
    1.23/unit

40
Solution
  • two operators
  • machine down (n) probability machine hour
    lost/8-hr day
  • 0 0.216 0
  • 1 0.432 0
  • 2 0.288 0
  • 3 0.064 0.064x8 0.512

  • Total 0.512
  • Total production time - 0.512
    23.448(hrs)
  • Number of products to be produced 23.448x60
    1409.28units
  • Average rate 1409.28/( ) 1176.16 ?TEC
    1.14/unit
  • Three operators TEC (3x103x60)/180
    1.17/unit

41
Combinations of random and synchronous servicing
  • When
  • Servicing time constant
  • The machines are serviced randomly
  • Breakdowns follow a certain distribution
  • Approaches
  • N 6 Use the empirical curves
  • N gt 6 Wrights formula
  • If TBF ? exponential distribution Ashcrofts
    method
  • Calculate k l/m ?using table A3-13 ?machine
    interference
  • and c m l i
  • Where k service ratio, c total cycle time
  • l servicing time, i machine
    interference time
  • ( )
  • I inference ( mean servicing time)
  • X mean machine running time/mean
    machine servicing time,
  • N number of machines/operator

42
Example
In a quilling production, an operator is
assigned 60 spindles. The mean machine running
time/ package determined by stopwatch study, is
150. The standard mean servicing time/package is
3. Calculate the machine interference using the
Wrights formula and the Ashcrofts method?
43
Solution
  • Wrights formula
  • Thus, we would have
  • machine running time 150.0 min
  • servicing time 3.0 min
  • machine interference time 11.6 x 3 34.8 min
  • Ashcrofts method
  • From Table A3-13, Appendix 3, with exponential
    service time and k l/m 3/150 0.02 N 60,
    we have a machine interference time 16.8 of the
    cycle time. i 0.168c
  • c m l i 150 3 0.168c ? 0.832c 153
  • ?c 184 min
  • i 0.168c 30.9 min

44
(No Transcript)
45
Line Balancing
  • Helps to determine the ideal number of workers to
    be assigned to a production line
  • Computer software is available to eliminate the
    calculations

46
Line Balancing Problem 1
  • Given
  • Operation times
  • Cycle time
  • Requirement determine number of operators needed
    for each operation
  • The rate of production is dependent on the
    slowest operator
  • Where E efficiency
  • S.M. standard time per operation
  • A.M allowed standard time per
    operation
  • Idle100 - E

47
Line Balancing Problem 1
  • Procedure
  • Calculate total number of operators required
  • Where N number of operator needed in the line
    R Desired rate of production
  • Find time required for producing one unit
  • Number of operators needed for each operation
    (standard time of operation/allowed time to
    produce one unit)
  • Find the slowest operation operation time
    (standard time/number of operators in the
    operation)

48
Example
  • Assume that we have a new design for which we
    are establishing an assembly line. 8 distinct
    operations are involved. The line must produce
    700units/day (or 700/4801.458 units/min), and
    since it is desirable to minimize storage, we do
    not want to produce many more than 700units/day.
    The 8 operations involve the following standard
    minutes based on existing standard data 1.25
    min, 1.38 min, 2.58 min, 3.84 min, 1.27 min, 1.29
    min, 2.48min, 1.28 min. To plan this assembly
    line for the most economical setup, we estimate
    the number of operators required for a given
    level of efficiency say, 95 .

49
Solution
  • total number of operators required at 100
    efficiency N 1.458(1.25 1.381.28)/1 22.4
  • total number of operators required at
    95efficiency
  • 22.4/0.95 23.6 24 (operators)
  • time required for producing one unit
    480/7000.685 minutes
  • Number of operators need on each operation
  • Operation standard minutes no. of operators
  • Operation1 1.25 1.25/0.685 2
  • Operation2 1.38 1.38/0.685 2
  • Operation3 2.58 2.58/0.685 4
  • Operation4 3.84 3.84/0.685 6
  • Operation5 1.27 1.27/0.685 2
  • Operation6 1.29 1.29/0.685 2
  • Operation7 2.48 2.48/0.685 4
  • Operation8 1.28 1.28/0.685 2
  • Total 15.37 24

50
Solution
  • Slowest operation
  • Operation Time
  • Operation1 1.25/2 0.625
  • Operation2 1.38/2 0.690
  • Operation3 2.58/4 0.645
  • Operation4 3.84/6 0.640
  • Operation5 1.27/2 0.635
  • Operation6 1.29/2 0.645
  • Operation7 2.48/4 0.620
  • Operation8 1.28/2 0.640
  • Output of the line 2 operators x 60 min/ 1.38
    87 pieces/hour or 696 piecs/day

51
Line Balancing Problem 2
  • Given
  • Maximum allowable cycle time
  • Maximum allowable number of workstations
  • Precedence constraint
  • Processing time for each job
  • Requirement how to assign jobs to
    workstation?minimize number of workstations

52
Line Balancing Problem 2
  • Procedure
  • Step1 Calculate positional weight for each job
    sum of processing time of that job and the
    processing time of jobs that follow the
    considered job.
  • Step 2 Sort positional weight in decreasing
    order. Set W1
  • Step 3 Assign job Jk to workstations according
    to
  • Its positional weight
  • Processing time tW tk C, assign job Jk to
    workstation W if not W W1
  • Precedence constraint
  • Step 4 repeat step 3 until all jobs are assigned
  • Where tW total assigned time at work station W

53
Line Balancing Example
  • Assume that the required production per
    450-minute shift is 300 units. The cycle time of
    the system is 450/300 1.5 minutes

54
Solution
  • Positional weights
  • Sorted jobs positional weight
    Immediate predecessors
  • 0 0.460.250.221.10.870.280.721.320.49
    0.556.26 -
  • 1 4.75 -
  • 3 4.40 0,1
  • 4 4.18 3
  • 2 3.76 0
  • 5 3.51 2
  • 6 2.64 5
  • 8 2.36 4,6
  • 7 1.76 4
  • 9 1.04 7,8
  • 10 0.55 9

55
Solution
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com