Title: Complete Streets Michigans Approach
1Complete StreetsMichigans Approach
AASHTO SCODAnnual MeetingJuly 15, 2008
Mark A. Van Port Fleet
2- Why accommodate our non-motorized friends?
3Im a ped, youre a ped, wouldnt you like to be
a ped too?
4MDOTs Mission Statement
- Providing the highest quality integrated
transportation services for economic benefit and
improved quality of life
5Legislative Change
- Change to state law allowing the use of state
funds to construct sidewalks.
62007 Energy Bill
- includes a sense of Congress that Complete
Streets Design Techniques be considered when
constructing new roadways or rehabilitating
existing facilities. State and local governments
shall consider policies designed to accommodate
all users, including motorists, pedestrians,
cyclists, transit riders, and people of all ages
and abilities.
7(No Transcript)
8LIABILITY
- AGENCY liability risk low
- Repair and Maintain
- No design liability
- Road bed surface only
- EMPLOYEE liability risk also low
- Gross negligence standard
- The proximate cause requirement
9MDOT Non-Motorized Committee
- Created In 2006
- Meeting since October 2006
- The Committee will serve as forum for Staff to
discuss non-motorized topics and work with one
another on non-motorized issues by providing
input and resources to one another.
10Non-Motorized Committee Members Include
- Traffic Safety Non-Motorized Specialist
- Standards Engineer
- Region System Manager
- Economic Developments Specialist
- Environmental Planning Manager
- Senior Mobility Specialist
- Tort Liability Specialist
- Engineer of Design
- CSS Specialist
11Staff Training and Actions
- Conducted ADA Training in 2008
- 400 MDOT staff trained
- Held FHWA Designing Streets for Pedestrian Safety
- Over 50 MDOT staff trained
- MDOT Call for Projects to include
Pedestrian/Bicycle design features where
applicable. - Conducted Safety Audits
- Working with Schools along trunkline routes to
make more pedestrian and bike friendly
12(No Transcript)
13What can you do?
Photo Craig Allred (FHWA)
14A road safety audit also
- Considers the safety of all road users
- Considers interactions at the borders or limits
of the project - Examines the interaction of project elements
- Proactively considers mitigation measures
- http//drusilla.hsrc.unc.edu/cms/downloads/PedRSA.
reduced.pdf
15Master Promptlist
- Zones
- Streets
- Street Crossings
- Parking Areas / Adjacent Developments
- Transit Areas
- Subtopics
- Presence, Design and Placement
- Quality, Condition, and Obstructions
- Continuity and Connectivity
- Lighting
- Visibility
- Access Management
- Traffic Characteristics
- Signs and Pavement Markings
- Signals
16Detailed Promptlist
17Design
18Accessibility
19Lighting
20Visibility
21Access Management
22Continuity, Connectivity and Channelization
23Signs, Markings and Traffic Control Devices, Oh
My
24Traffic Characteristics
25Behavior and Conflicts with Other Road Users
26Ideally, Pedestrians would cross at a controlled
intersection
27But the reality is quite different
28Where is Ped at end of WALK Signal?
Adult (4 ft/sec) 32 to curb
Elderly (3 ft/sec) 48 to curb
29Use of Countdown Pedestrian Signals
Photo courtesy of tfhrc.gov
30Countdown Pedestrian Signals
- Countdown Signals
- Provides Additional
- Information to Ped
- Peds Adjust Speed
- Peace of Mind
- Target - 0.5 M
-
31Pedestrian Relief Islands
32Pedestrian Relief IslandUS-12 in Sturgis,
Michigan
33Pedestrian Relief IslandUS-12 in Sturgis,
Michigan
34Pedestrian Relief IslandUS-12 in Sturgis,
Michigan
35Pedestrian Relief IslandUS-12 in Sturgis,
Michigan
364 to 3 Lane ConversionsMichigan study 8
corridors
Injury crashes 26
Ped. Injuries 37
Left turners cross only one lane
E. Lansing M-43
37Conceptual Streetscape - Commercial
38Conceptual Streetscape - Commercial
39Conceptual Streetscape - Residential
40Conceptual Streetscape - Residential
41Roundabouts and Pedestrians?
42Non-Motorized Trails for Bay Region
43Non-Motorized Trails for Bay Region
44Thank You