Selfmanagement to increase safe driving among shorthaul truck drivers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Selfmanagement to increase safe driving among shorthaul truck drivers

Description:

Self management is a process where individuals change their own behavior by: ... Selecting a strategy to promote behavior change ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: drjohn2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Selfmanagement to increase safe driving among shorthaul truck drivers


1
Self-management to increase safe driving among
short-haul truck drivers
  • Hickman Geller, in press

2
Overview
  • Economic impact of vehicle crashes was about 230
    billion in 2000
  • Speeding was a contributing factor in 29 of
    fatal crashes in 2000
  • Self management is a process where individuals
    change their own behavior by
  • Manipulating antecedents
  • Observing and recording specific target behaviors
  • Self-administering rewards for achievements
  • (see also chapter on self-management in ODonohue
    and Krasners Theories of Behavior Therapy)

3
Self-Management Process
  • 6 steps
  • Identify one or more target behaviors
  • Establish a baseline using self-monitoring, along
    with identification of antecedents and
    consequences associated with targets
  • Selecting a goal that is specific, motivational,
    attainable, relevant, and trackable (SMART)
  • Selecting a strategy to promote behavior change
  • Self-observing and self-recording the target
    behavior to measure progress
  • Administering self-rewards

4
Importance of Current Study
  • Few studies have examined self-management of work
    behavior
  • In safety, self-management is important, as its
    hard to arrange observations for many occupations
  • In addition, some people do not like to give or
    receive feedback.
  • If we were to find a way to change behavior that
    did not involve observation by others and
    feedback, it would be well-accepted.

5
Method
  • N33 drivers
  • 2 groups
  • Pre-behavior group (n21)
  • Post-behavior group (n12)
  • DVs
  • Participation measured as percentage of s-m
    sheets completed
  • Extreme braking braking incidents that
    resulted in a decrease in speed greater than or
    equal to 7 mph/sec divided by of ppts.
  • Overspeed minutes spent traveling at a speed
    greater than 63 mph/total driving minutes

6
Independent Variables
  • 1. SMS Training and education
  • Rationale for SMS
  • Importance of antecedent/consequence-focused
    self-intentions
  • Identification of As and Cs associated with
    at-risk and safe driving
  • Goal setting
  • How to administer self-rewards
  • How to use the self-monitoring form, with group
    exercises
  • How to interpret data on a bar graph
  • Instructions about the incentive/reward condition
  • A brief quiz to assess understanding
  • A demographic survey (name, age, gender,
    experience, etc.)

7
Independent Variables (contd)
  • 2. Self-observations
  • Observations conducted once per day
  • Estimated the percentage of times they would (or
    did) drive overspeed and the number of times
    they would engage in extreme braking
  • Pre-behavior group did this before starting the
    day
  • Post-behavior group did this after completing the
    day

8
Independent Variables (contd)
  • 3. Individual feedback
  • Each ppt received a memo stating incentive
    earnings, and a bar graph comparing the data
    he/she reported to the actual data from his/her
    truck for the week.
  • 4. Incentive/reward
  • Each ppt received 1 per s-m form completed and
    returned
  • There was a lottery wherein 2 winners were
    selected at the end of intervention to receive a
    50 cash prize
  • Design 2-group ABA with multiple baseline design
    across groups

9
Results
  • Post-behavior group completed more forms than
    pre-behavior group
  • Sig decreases in overspeed for both groups when
    IV was applied
  • Sig increases in overspeed for both groups when
    IV was removed
  • NS for extreme braking for pre-behavior group
  • Sig effects for extreme braking for post-behavior
    group

10
McSween Ch 19-20
  • Self-observation is most appropriate when
  • Employees work in small crews (2-3 emps)
  • Employees are extremely resistant to peer
    observations
  • Typically, self-observation processes ask 3
    questions
  • Whats my job?
  • Identify critical behaviors
  • How am I doing?
  • Develop a sampling strategy (co-worker could
    prompt self-observation)
  • Challenge how to trigger the sampling?
  • Whats in it for me?

11
Steps in Implementing a Self-Obs Process
  • Select a safety rep from each group
  • Trigger the daily observations
  • Collect, summarize, and post the data
  • R for participating in the process
  • Create an index
  • Develop a sampling process
  • Post the self-observation data
  • Provide group and individual recognition

12
Ch 20 Steering Committee
  • Most effective with 5-8 members
  • Design team is 8-12 may need to decreasing this
    number for steering team
  • Recommended term of office 1-2 years
  • No more than 2 new members start at a time
  • Training for the Steering Committee (they need to
    know how to)
  • Identify, encourage, and reinforce safe work
    behaviors by all employees
  • Present safety data to other employees in
    meetings as feedback and lead goal
    setting/celebration activities
  • Assess whether the process is remaining true to
    its values
  • Make effective use of time and resources in
    meetings

13
Responsibilities
  • The steering committee must
  • Manage process measures
  • Employee involvement
  • Data analysis and improvement projects
  • Manage behavioral safety measures
  • Are people behaving more safely?
  • Manage safety results and outcome measures
  • Analyzing injuries (add items to checklist
    preventing the future)
  • Know the steering committee functions (pp 180-181)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com