Title: We listen to patients: how a charity is taking forward research that people affected by cancer want
1We listen to patientshow a charity is taking
forward research that people affected by cancer
want
- Jim Elliott
- Research Adviser
- Macmillan Cancer Support
- Christine Allmark,
- Research Assistant,
- CRUK Clinical Centre,
- Leeds,
- Phil Cotterell,
- Research Fellow,
- Centre for Citizen Participation,
- Brunel University
2Macmillans User-led research grant competition
at the NCRI Conference
- History where the idea came from
- The aims of the scheme
- How we took the idea forward
- 2006, the first competition
- Opportunities and challenges
- 2007 and beyond
3History where the idea came from
- 2005 NCRI Conference feedback
- 2006 NCRI Conference Planning Group
- The Macmillan Listening Study
- Involving Cancer Voices
- And a wing and a prayer
4(No Transcript)
5Macmillan Listening Study findings priorities
6Macmillan Listening Study - recommendations
- NCRI strategy to access and respond to the views
of people affected by cancer - More effective dissemination to professionals and
public - Comprehensive appraisal of current evidence in
each priority area prior to commissioning - More research on Impact of cancer
- Encourage and support user involvement
- Recognise that user involvement requires
facilitation and changes to working practices
7(No Transcript)
8The aims of the scheme
- To demonstrate a way of actively involving people
affected by cancer in research - To promote wider involvement
- To start to take forward some new research on the
impact of cancer on everyday life - To demonstrate the usefulness of the Listening
Study and bring it to life
9(No Transcript)
10How we took the idea forward
- Use of the Listening Study as the focus
- Two-stage process with outlines at the conference
- Requirement for ideas to be tested with patient
and carer delegates at the conference and signed
off - Collaboration a minimum requirement
- Full applications to be worked up from short-list
- Outlines assessed by 3 patients and 3 Macmillan
staff - Provided idea is feasible patient view decides
- Full applications subjected to expert peer review
prior to assessment by same panel - Initially proposed 1 award of 50,000 in 2006
11NCRI Conference 2006 user involvement in action
12Some outlines received at the 2006 conference
- 18 submitted, including
- Developing strategies to reduce anxiety /
depression of women facing radiotherapy for
breast cancer - Enabling women with breast cancer to
differentiate between musculo-skeletal pain of
malignant and non-malignant origin - The acceptability of health prevention
information to relatives of dying patients - Helping people affected by cancer to make good
decisions about fertility storage - Can patients help teach Health Care Professionals
how to assess the sexual concerns of men and
women with cancer - Defining the effects of a diagnosis on the
members of a patients family
13The 2006 winners
- Short listed 6 and made 3 awards (not the 1
planned) - Home but not Alone can user led support improve
QoL in patients with HN Cancer? Sheila Fisher
with Ethel Culling. Christine Allmark employed on
grant - Older womens experience of breast cancer
alongside other health conditions Julia
Addington-Hall with Richard Stephens - Identifying the impact of service user
involvement on the lives of people affected by
cancer Phil Cotterell with Gwen Harlow
14Opportunities and challenges applicants and
patients
- Phil Cotterell on the opportunities and
challenges presented by the competition for
professional researchers - Christine Allmark on the opportunities and
challenges presented by the grant for a patient
who is part of the research team
15Opportunities and challenges applicants
- Connection with previous experience/expertise/inte
rest - Opportunity to secure funding for research
utilising a participatory methodology
perception of acceptability compared with other
sources of funding - Opportunity for first post-doctoral principal
investigator role (career and research
development) - Involvement was a key component of the study
which was made clear in outline bid and full
application including transparency about time
for service user involvement and the financial
implications
16Opportunities and challenges applicants
- Developed a research group in which two service
user researchers were integral and five
co-applicants formed part of the collaborative - Time factored in for collaborative working and
for three researchers to meet/support/discuss/make
decisions - Opportunity to make service user involvement in
research a meaningful reality - Making a difference design, data collection,
analysis, report writing, dissemination. Definite
value added - Strong organisational and grant competition ethos
of research with not for people affected by
cancer
17Home but not Alone User-mentor support for
people with Head Neck Cancer
- Background
- Previous work (our group) shows people feel
bereft in the period after discharge following
first radical therapy. - Our hypothesis is that User-mentors might provide
support. - Leading the work
- Users have a unique and complementary insight.
- Our aim is to enable a User to train as a
clinical researcher to lead the study, the
User-mentor training package and to develop this
idea to clinical practice
18Home but not Alone User-mentor support for
people with Head Neck Cancer
- Design
- Focus Groups Oral, Laryngeal and Carers.
- Individual interviews.
- Contemporaneous diaries.
- Topic list forwarded prior to meeting (as per the
Listening Study) to help ensure good discussion
and consensus - To provide evidence to underpin the development
of a training package based on patient need.
19Home but not Alone User-mentor support for
people with Head Neck Cancer
- Progress so far
- The permissions ethics
- RD
- site specific
approvals - contracts
- CRB!!!!!...........
.................................... - Focus group accrual in progress
- Diary patient accrual in progress
- Aim To run the first focus group ASAP
202007 and beyond
- 2007 competition 12 outlines received, 6 short
listed and 3 awards made of 60k each - Supporting relatives An investigation into
obstacles and aids to information exchange within
families affected by cancer Judith Robinson and
Claire Foster - The use of herbal medicines by people with cancer
Christine Gratus and Sue Wilson - The role of the primary care team in the care and
support of patients diagnosed with cancer
perspectives of patients, family members and
primary health care professionals Eila Watson
and John Belcher
21NCRI Conference 2007 user involvement in action
again
222008 competition so far.
- 17 outline applications received
- Short-listing about to happen
- 3 or 4 awards planned of 60k each
23NCRI Conference 2008 user involvement in action
again
24What next? Developing the agenda further and
involving others
- Macmillan is happy to help and advise other NCRI
partners on user involvement at all levels - Development of an NCRI strategy to access and
respond to the views of people affected by cancer
(MLS recommendation 1) - Comprehensive literature review method available
for others to use and develop - Further developing the research agenda on the
impact of cancer on everyday life through the
National Cancer Survivorship Initiative - 2009 NCRI Conference competition plan your
applications now!
25Jim Elliott Christine Allmark Phil Cotterell