Theory and Data in Psychology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Theory and Data in Psychology

Description:

A hunch or a guess is not a theory ... Observations Tentative Explanation or Theory ... If theory X is correct then Y should happen run a study and observe ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: tri5246
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Theory and Data in Psychology


1
Theory and Data in Psychology
  • What is a theory?
  • Theories at multiple levels
  • How we know when were wrong
  • Hypotheses/Predictions --gt Confirmation/Disconfirm
    ation
  • Cant prove a theory
  • Falsifiability
  • Examples of Theory-Testing Process

2
Introduction
  • Fixing a light-bulb
  • Checking possibilities
  • One possibility at a time
  • Hypothesis driven

3
A True Experiment
  • Manipulate or systematically change the values of
    one variable while holding everything else
    constant
  • Old light bulb vs new
  • Old reading program versus new program

4
From an experiment or study ---gt Theory
5
Theory
  • Unfortunate connotations--e.g. an idea in
    someones head
  • A hunch or a guess is not a theory
  • Sometimes opinion mistaken for theory and
    psychology dismissed as just a lot of theories

6
Theory as General Principles
  • Light bulb scenario flip a switch and the bulb
    lights up--empirical observation
  • But whats the explanation?
  • Generality
  • Definition A statement or set of statements that
    describes the underlying general principles for
    some phenomenon or class of phenomena

7
Structures Processes
  • Structures
  • electrons and conductors
  • words and concepts
  • Processes
  • flow of electrons (current)
  • assocations between concepts (e.g. spreading
    activation)

8
Why?
  • Allows us to relate one event to another--to
    organize our knowledge
  • Allows us to explain and predict
  • Allows us to use our knowledge

9
The Ladder of Principles
10
Hierarchies
  • Local or low level theories--limited class of
    phenomena (e.g. word recognition or light bulbs)
  • High Level or General theories--wider class of
    phenomena (e.g. reading comprehension or
    electromagnetic theory)

11
General Principles in Psychology
  • Physics versus Psychology
  • General principles by which to explain (e.g.
    memory, learning, or depression)
  • Observation repeating a name improves memory
  • Principle of the association or a retrieval cue

12
Knowing When Were Wrong Testing Our Theories
  • How do we test a theory?
  • Theory-Data Cycle
  • The Falsifiability Requirement
  • The Weight of the Evidence

13
Testing Theories
  • Observations gtgt Tentative Explanation or Theory
  • Test theory with further observation (e.g.
    experiment or other study)
  • How? Derive a prediction or hypothesis about the
    results of an experiment or study
  • If theory X is correct then Y should happen gt run
    a study and observe whether Y happens

14
Prediction Disconfirmed
  • Something is wrong. What?
  • Perhaps we did the study wrong
  • Translation of theory into hypotheses or
    predictions flawed Logic wrong
  • Measurement problems
  • Implementation flawed
  • Theory wrong or more limited than thought

15
Prediction Confirmed
  • Have we proved our theory? Absolutely not!
  • Theory passed the test not disconfirmed--gt
    additional confidence in theory
  • Confounds--X may have happened b/c of s.t. else
  • Other theories make similar predictions
  • May rule out alternative theories--if they made
    different predictions (indirect evidence)
  • Counter-intuitive predictions

16
Summary
  • When a prediction is disconfirmed gtgt clear
    evidence that something is wrong, either with the
    theory or the study
  • If a prediction is confirmed then confidence in
    or support for theory increases.
  • Theories never proven.

17
The Theory-Data Cycle
18
Falsifiability
19
Falsifiability Criterion
  • In order to know if our theory is right we must
    test it
  • Some theories cant be tested--they can be
    neither supported or not supported
    (unfalsifiable)
  • If cant be falsified, no explanatory power
  • Stanovich example

20
The Weight of the Evidence
21
The Weight of the Evidence
  • A single study does not prove a theory nor does
    it really disconfirm the theory
  • A question of accumulating evidence
  • Is the evidence of one type or varied?
  • Theory can have much evidence in its favor and
    yet new evidence may increase overturn
  • A strong theory is well-supported not proven

22
Three Case Studies
  • Harlow
  • The Apathetic Bystander
  • Therapeutic Touch

23
Harlows Experiment
24
Background to study
  • Babies form strong attachments to adult
    caretakers. Why? Explanation?
  • Cupboard Theory (reduce hunger)
  • Underlying cupboard theory is more general theory
    Drive Reduction Theories

25
Harlows Experiment
  • Test Cupboard Theory gt 1st consider alternative
    explanations/theories
  • Contact Comfort Theory
  • In nature, these two variables confounded
  • Harlow separated them (wire vs terrycloth)
  • Which mother preferred according to each theory?

26
Harlows Findings
  • Babies clung to terrycloth mother 12-18 hours/day
  • So what? Is theory proved?
  • Further tests

27
Two Important Points
  • Cupboard Theory a good theory b/c testable--could
    derive a prediction and check theory
  • Idea tested at multiple levels

28
Disconfirmation at Multiple Levels
29
The Apathetic Bystander
  • Terrifying failures of human compassion?
  • Large cities anonymity
  • Internal state or situational explanation?
  • Smoke-Filled Room Experiment Analog (Latané
    Darley, 1970)

30
Smoked-filled Room Experiment
  • Classic series of experiments
  • The setting a waiting room
  • Question Will subjects report emergency or not
  • Independent variable?
  • Dependent variable?
  • Findings

31
Smoked-Filled Room Experiment
32
Summary
  • Follow-up studies gt different settings and
    different emergencies
  • Implication safety in numbers may be wrong
  • Prediction confirmed by data AND
    counter-intuitive (therefore stronger)
  • Personality factors equated by randomization
  • General principle affirmed--external factors can
    be more important than personality factors

33
Therapeutic Touch
34
Weight of the Evidence Revisited
  • No single experiment makes or breaks a
    theory--specific findings make contact with other
    studies
  • Harlows finding (nutrition alone insuff)
    supported by other work (see Mook, pp. 119-123)
  • Bystander-intervention studies (see chpt 12)
  • Cross-checks

35
From Big Questions to Small Studies--And Back
Again
  • Single study--limited scope, small, specific,
    answerable questions
  • Operationalizing a variable--specific choices
  • External Validity (Generalizability) Issue
  • Then whats the point of these studies?

36
Three Caveats
  • Specific study as example of more general and
    important processes
  • Experiments do not Stand Alone
  • Experiment can test a theory at many levels at
    once
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com