Creating Winners - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Creating Winners

Description:

Unfair trade policies with our products blocked (largest trade deficit yet ... Depends on one's legislature! First do no harm... Minnesota's JOBZ program. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: IFIC1
Category:
Tags: creating | winners

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Creating Winners


1
Creating Winners
  • Out of Chaos
  • 20 September 2005

Gary Blumenthal World Perspectives, Inc.
2
The Agenda
  • Rationale for Farm Bill Change
  • Rumors and Scuttlebutt
  • Review of Issues by NASDA committees
  • U.S. Winner Advantages

3
Rationale for Change
4
Rationale for Change
  • Farmer Views
  • Unfair competition from EU, Brazil and Argentina.
  • Unfair trade policies with our products blocked
    (largest trade deficit yet WTO rules against).
  • Rising land values blamed on farm bill
    (deadweight loss 30-35).
  • Not enough rural development for comfort and
    younger people.

Confluence of Factors Driving U.S. Farm Policy
  • Adverse Effects
  • Budget Constraints
  • Trade Negotiations
  • Trade Disputes
  • Farm Bill Justification

-0.6 FY 2006-2007
5
Rumors and Scuttlebutt
6
Timing
  • Extend 2007 farm bill (due to Doha)
  • 1995 became 1996 farm bill
  • 2003 became the 2002 farm bill

7
Political Environment
  • Bush Administration
  • Six questions
  • Hints of submitting a farm bill proposal (first?)
  • farm programs should not drive markets Chuck
    Conner
  • Lame Duck in 2007
  • Other Factors
  • Iowa primaries
  • Commodity prices
  • Doha Negotiations
  • Long-term planning at best

8
Alternative Concepts
  • Buyout (dairy buyout, tobacco, peanuts)
  • Must be financially attractive
  • Accepted by producers
  • But avoiding future restoration by Congress?
  • Risk Management
  • EU investigating
  • Shift to private (ie. Social Security)
  • Devolution
  • EU CAP Reform
  • Depends on ones legislature!

9
First do no harm
  • The current farm policy approach is not
    sustainable, but any replacement must be doubly
    persuasive as to its wisdom and benefit.

10
Farm and Ranch Financial Viability
11
Basic Numbers
  • 7 of farms receive 50 of subsidies 60 of
    farms receive no subsidies at all (no evidence
    they are less profitable).
  • 400 farms 10 of production
  • 35,000 farms (1.6) produce 50
  • 2 million farms produce 50

12
Past Efforts
  • The number of U.S. farms has fallen by 2/3s in
    past 40 years.
  • Japan has 4x support farms lost at 2x rate
  • EU has 2x support farms lost at 50 faster.
  • 225 billion spent over 13 years to slow the loss
    (63,000 farmers or 3.1 million/extra farmer).

Excess labor is a misallocation of resource.
13
Farm Size and Viability
  • Farmers in Bhutan and Bangladesh manage one-half
    acre of land apiece little differently than the
    first farmer 10,000 years ago.
  • Lots of farmers so we must be competitive.
  • Blairo Maggi 200,000 ha. in Brazil.
  • Japan has focused support on small farms but now
    ponders favoring larger, younger operators.

14
Support Farm Income
  • Income higher under decoupling, especially with
    volatility.
  • Land values higher with countercyclical payments.
  • Market share has declined.

15
U.S. Farmer Attitudes
  • Government subsidies have actually stifled
    incentives for entrepreneurship among grain
    farmers by relieving financial pressure for them
    to adapt.
  • Those who prosper in this future agriculture must
    be willing to challenge their traditional comfort
    zone
  • Create competitive advantages rather than protect
    old onesbut this will be much more difficult
    if policymakers continue to emphasize income
    subsidies instead of strategic investments.

16
Financial Principles
  • Commodity Price Declines (perpetual -2 annual
    declines in real commodity prices)
  • Value Chain Integration (reduces volatility
    risks)
  • Waste and Preservation (labor is cheap land and
    tech is valuable)

17
Global Problem
  • Blame America (UNCTAD Meeting)
  • Top growth areas for developing countries
  • Information technology
  • Textiles and clothing
  • Renewable energy products

18
Risk Management
  • Price insurance (put options)
  • Cash accounting and income averaging
  • Crop Insurance
  • (OMB assessment Results Not Demonstrated)
  • Weather-based derivatives
  • AFBF/ASA joint research

--Only a minority of farmers use market-based
tools. --Some IL FB Board members skip buying
crop insurance.
19
Rural Community and Economic Development
20
Conflicting Dynamics
  • Commodity programs are weak rural development
    policy (rural population declines fastest in
    counties with largest farmers (Oxfam)
  • Off-farm income makes small farms viable
  • Rural development brings off-farm jobs.
  • Minnesota's JOBZ program.
  • Rural development and off-farm jobs elevate the
    land values that hurts farm viability.

21
Bio-Industry Development
22
Market or Policy Driven?
  • Prospective new Farm Bill title
  • Research under-funded
  • Ethanol drives up the cost of livestock
    production.

23
Global Trade and Competitiveness
24
Market and Policy Drivers
  • Both competition and opportunities have magnified
  • Race to the bottom?
  • Nearly every market loss is to Brazil FAS
  • Domestic policies focused on maintenance of the
    status quo
  • No unilateral disarmament

25
Enhancing Markets and Marketing Opportunities
26
Markets are Calling
  • We pour billions of dollars into corn and wheat
    where markets are flat but export sales of seeds
    and tree nuts are booming.
  • Product Value Shifts (affluence begets
    specialized demand)
  • Low-Lin soybeans 170,000 acres this year, 1
    million next (Asia customers call)

27
Marketing Principles
  • Build the supply side of the business for the
    long-term
  • Business Guru Peter Drucker
  • Value is driven by marketing and distribution
    (farm value is 20 and declining)

28
Specialization Example
29
Farm Bill Titles
  • Current Title
  • Commodity Programs
  • Conservation
  • Farm Credit
  • Agricultural Trde and Aid
  • Nutrition Programs
  • Research
  • Forestry
  • Market Based
  • Consumer knowledge and demand
  • Innovation
  • Quality
  • Traceability
  • Investment and integration
  • Nutragenomics

30
Imports in lieu of Production
  • Fruits and Vegetables
  • Canola
  • Pulses
  • Oats
  • Feeder cattle and pigs

31
Sustaining Agricultural Resources
32
Sustaining Commodity Money!
  • Disaster payments deducted from conservation, not
    commodity programs
  • Environmental Conservation Security not funded
  • Conservation (OMB assessment Results Not
    Demonstrated)
  • Green groups prevalent but commodity groups
    prevail cannot funnel all money into
    conservation.
  • Large Farms the enemy of sustainability? Data
    indicates that small are exempt (CAFO) liability
    is correlated to environmental investment (UK
    study EPA megatrends).

33
Biosecurity
34
Daunting Risks and Costs
  • CARVER Assessments
  • USA unique in the cost burden

35
Food Safety and Security Nutrition, Food
Assistance and Obesity
36
Ensure Healthful Food Supply
  • Obesity 1 health issue
  • Five a Day FV is now 9-13 per day.
  • Pump primed for carbs, fats and protein
  • U.S. FV production is flat
  • Imports up 50 in four years.
  • Poor cant afford to eat healthy but cotton
    production up 35 in two years overhang in world
    markets market price half the loan rate.
  • Health-based production scenario
  • -700,000 acres of sugarbeets
  • -1.2 mil. Acres of cane
  • -25 hamburger

37
Concluding Thoughts
38
  • There are important calculations on how to
    structure and win in the environment of the
    21st century agriculture.
  • Proactive choices prevail over defaulting to
    passiveness Steven Covey
  • Unless your proposals are compelling, the status
    quo prevails.

39
U.S. Winner Advantages
  • Capital/Resource Base
  • Technology
  • Management Capacity

40
Capital/Resources
  • Capital
  • 11 Trillion GDP 38,000 per capita
  • Water
  • Land
  • Low value commodities drive capital away

41
Technology Development and Utilization
  • Rabobank Study Labor Machinery -- U.S. is
    25-45 less expensive than Brazil and Argentina
    respectively technologies eclipse labor.
  • RR Soybeans 900 expansion
  • Biotechnology Kyoto Univ. researchers soybean
    that fights male baldness.

42
Management Capacity
  • More highly educated farmers
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Readily transferable skills? Culture

43
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com