Fighting Cyber Crime: CASES The BEST Value Proposition http:Security'WebUrb'dkframeEWISdocCASES'html - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Fighting Cyber Crime: CASES The BEST Value Proposition http:Security'WebUrb'dkframeEWISdocCASES'html

Description:

categorization and naming schemata needed for malicious code / viruses ... on the Internet regarding malicious code and viruses (e.g., statistics and benchmarks) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: URS18
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fighting Cyber Crime: CASES The BEST Value Proposition http:Security'WebUrb'dkframeEWISdocCASES'html


1
Fighting Cyber CrimeCASES The BEST Value
Proposition http//Security.WebUrb.dk/frame/EWIS
doc/CASES.html
2
What are the Challenges for Civil Society
  • home users going online
  • broadband
  • always online (e.g., with cable)
  • wireless
  • running an access point at home
  • server
  • anti-virus
  • firewall
  • distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack
  • Yes IPv6
  • will parti-
  • ally fix the
  • problem

Users dont Want to pay!
  • This increases users
  • risks for virus infections, hacking and DDoS
    attacks
  • costs (e.g., anti-virus solution for server
    1,250.00)

3
How Can CASES Help?
  • Cyberworld
  • Awareness and
  • Security
  • Enhancement
  • Structure
  • We need CASES to improve security for society but
    in particular for
  • home/private user or public, and
  • small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)

4
What is CASES? http//Security.WebUrb.dk/frame/EW
ISdoc/CASES.html
  • Trans-national effort for data and information
    sharing
  • focuses on
  • coordinating efforts regarding critical
    infastructure protection of data and information
  • Internet
  • electricity grids
  • health,
  • telecommunication networks
  • e-government
  • e-commerce and
  • others (e.g., industry and regional networks)

5
What is CASES? http//Security.WebUrb.dk/frame/EW
ISdoc/CASES.html
  • pan-European interest by several countries
    including but not limited to
  • Belgium promoter (contact martine.ducobu_at_ibpt.b
    e)
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • UK
  • Finland, France, Netherlands, Spain, and others
  • Candidate Member States
  • Slovenia and others
  • Affiliates
  • Switzerland
  • Norway
  • and others

6
What will CASES do?
  • Preparation and distribution of best practices
    material for target groups/markets
  • educational materials
  • awareness
  • Verification and distribution
  • warnings alerts
  • collection of information from sources
  • Warning, Advisory Reporting Point(s) (WARPs)

7
How Does CASES Support and Leverage Efforts Made
by the European Network and Information Security
Agency?
  • CASES
  • is hierarchically under the European Network and
    Information Security Agency (ENISA)
  • ENISAs steering committee is suggested to be
    made up of 6 people nominated by the Council and
    6 by the Commission
  • CASES will link to the ENISAs advisory council
    of 9 experts that is charged to interface with
    Member States activities

8
CASES Structure
CASES enables countries to share information,
leverage expertise and improve cybersecurity
9
How Does CASES Differ from European Cybersecurity
Agency?
  • CASES is not limited to EU focuses on
  • developing/measuring benchmark figures supporting
    eEurope Action Plan - 2005
  • statistics (what incident, where, how damage
    caused - RISK management)
  • Improving awareness and defense mechanisms
  • developing educational tools
  • communicating information to
  • managers and decision-makers
  • system experts
  • users
  • through partners (e.g., CERTs media)
  • European Network and Information Security Agency
    is an EU organization that does such tasks as
  • strategy
  • policy, and
  • regulation
  • while incorporating information provided by CASES
    amongst others to further facilitate its
    important work

10
How Does CASES differ from CERTs?
  • A CERT may
  • offer services for a subscription fee
  • private versus public CERTs
  • have a very narrow defined constituency, such as
  • government agencies (e.g., dept. of defense)
  • firms that subscribe and pay for particular
    services (e.g., alerts)
  • firm provides CERT type of services to external
    clients
  • large firms CERT for internal clients and
    divisions
  • provide on site help fire services
  • technical help

This can limit information sharing and creating
of synergies amongst different CERTs
11
How Can CASES Help Governments Society?
  • CASES national nodes provide
  • threat assessments,
  • statistical data,
  • identify trends and
  • warn about new vulnerabilities
  • to all constituencies (organizations and private
    citizens)

Improve information sharing and creating of
synergies across agencies, CERTs, vendors and
the public
12
What Resources are Needed to Run a a CASES
National Node?
  • human resources
  • could be from 2-6 people,
  • resources already in-house (e.g., government
    CERT),
  • being available on a flexible schedule
  • securing 27x7x365 coverage with other national
    nodes
  • UK is back-up for Luxembourg during Christmas eve
    2003 and vice versa for Pentacoste 2004
  • team must have
  • good technical, and
  • incident handling skills

13
What Resources are Needed to Run a CASES National
Node Effectively?
  • Essential is such as
  • hardware and software budget,
  • Internet browsing capabilities,
  • several e-mail accounts with at least 2
  • running on different infrastructure providers
    (e.g., telecom, cable and wireless)
  • ISPs using different backbone providers and
  • different Internet exchange services if at all
    possible
  • several telephone lines, fax, mobile phones,
    pagers, laptops,
  • encryption/digital signature capabilities,
  • trusted communication facilities
  • up to date windows OS, plus mail programs,
  • backup facilities
  • research machine with UNIX/Linux, and
  • training and travel budget

14
Where are the Synergies with FP6?
C A S E S
  • CAMDIER develops
  • categorization and naming schemata needed for
    malicious code / viruses
  • database for such code with graphical and other
    interfaces
  • thereby helping CASES in its efforts to provide
    an accurate picture about cybersecurity on the
    Internet regarding malicious code and viruses
    (e.g., statistics and benchmarks)

15
Conclusion
  • Society needs IT security services that are
  • complementing CERTs but not replacing the latter
  • low regarding start-up and resource costs (i.e.
    cost-effective),
  • versatile and flexible,
  • geared to information sharing, while leveraging
    of scarce resources,
  • promote security, trust and confidence, and
  • support training and awareness efforts

16
Conclusion CASES can Help
  • CASES is intended to establish a network of
    national nodes for information sharing across
    borders regarding
  • national virus warning alert schemes including
    other CASES National Nodes,
  • CASES coordination/management node,
  • CERTs and Warning, Advisory and Reporting Points
    (WARPs) in industry (e.g., electricity EoN),
  • education awareness initiatives, and
  • vendors who provide warning (vulnerability
    alert) material

17
Conclusion CASES TIME Table
  • Tenders have been requested
  • Proposal for trial operation / incubator will be
    written and submitted to promoter (BE) by May
  • Trial starts June 2003
  • setting up national nodes
  • implementing trusted communication
  • implementing system for data collection and
    distribution of information
  • developing of best practice, awareness and
    educational material
  • statistical analysis and trends

18
Conclusion -- CASES as a Value Proposition
  • Fire Marshalls provide information about chemical
    fires accumulated and recorded in a database,
    cases provide the insurance industry with
  • risk data permitting the
  • setting of insurance rates for offering clients
    the option to insure their assets against
    chemical fires
  • CASES provides a comprehensive national
    international picture about computer viruses,
    malicious code, vulnerabilities and hacking
    attacks permitting firms governments to use
    these data to
  • obtain risk information for
  • deciding about what, how, when and why to invest
    in IT security as a value proposition

19
Conclusion
  • Reducing the risk for cybersecurity incidents
    with CASES is far cheaper than extinguishing
    numerous annual brush fires regularly
  • Leveraging scarce resources amongst participating
    nations to further protect
  • e-government/e-commerce efforts, while
  • facilitating Internet access/use for citizens and
    SMEs

20
Resources Dependability and Cyber Security
  • Newslwetter-Archive (newsboard)
  • http//security.weburb.dk/frame/newsletters/other/
    information_security.html
  • Subscribe to weekly IT security newsletter for
    FREE by sending an empty e-mail to
  • Security-Subscribe_at_NewsWebUrb.dk
  • Comprehensive solutions against viruses, spam
    and hackers for citizens from
  • http//www.BullGuard.comFree Trial

21
Resources Dependability and Cyber Security
  • CASES temporary home with much info about the
    project can be visited here
  • http//Security.WebUrb.dk/frame/EWISdoc/CASES.html
  • more documents at this link
  • http//brief.weburb.dk/frame.php?locview/subjects
    /cases.html
  • See you May 10-13, 2003, at the IT security
    conference of the year
  • http//Conference.EICAR.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com