F

1
Facility OperationsandProcurement Property
Management

• FY 2005
• Environment, Safety Health Management Review

2
Environment Management SystemW. Chaloupka,
Management RepresentativeOccupational Safety
Health Management SystemR. Costa, Management
Representative
3
Why are we here?

• The purpose of this review is to
• Reflect upon our past performance to identify
• Strengths
• Weaknesses
• opportunities for improvement
• Discuss our path forward
• Meet the requirements of ISO 14001, Environmental
  Management System
• Meet the requirements of OHSAS 18001,
  Occupational Safety Health Management System
• Have coffee and breakfast on Andy

4
Agenda

• Introduction of EMS OSH Team Members
• FY 2005 Summary of Objectives and Targets
• Assessments
• FO Tier I Program
• Environmental Performance
• Occupational Safety Health Performance
• FY 2005 Cost Summary
• Sr. Management Evaluation

5
EMS OSH Team Members
Revised
6
FY 2005Summary ofObjective Targets
7
Objective Compliance
Objective Groundwater Protection
8
Objective Operational Performance
9
Objective Operational Performance
10
Objective Operational Performance
11
Objective Pollution Prevention
12
Objective Injury Free Work Place
13
Objective Continual Improvement
14
Objective Continual Improvement
15
Assessments
16
Assessments(Internal External)

• SBMS topics assessed
• Beryllium
• Confined Spaces
• Construction Safety
• Emergency Preparedness
• Environmental Assessments
• Environmental Monitoring
• Electrical Safety
• Lockout/Tagout
• Tier I Inspections

• Hazardous Waste Management
• Integrated Assessment
• Internal Controlled Documents
• Lifting Safety
• NEPA Cultural Resource Evaluation
• OSH Assessments
• Records Management
• Spill Response
• Work Planning Control

In addition, 18 assessments were conduced to
assure compliance with new and revised SBMS
Subject Areas
17
Non-Conformance

• Procedures are not being reviewed within
  established periods
• A current copy of the SPDES permit was not posted
  at the STP
• Non-conformances with NFPA 70E compliance
• Non-conformances with material handling
  compliance

This slide added after Management Review
18
Summary of Actions Resulting from Assessments

• Procedure revisions
• Risk assessments updated
• Contract language revised
• BNL Health Safety Plan
• BNL Health Safety Plan Template revised
• Contractor Health Safety Plan Revised
• Arc Flash analyses
• ADS generated
• Training
• Electrical Safety training
• Toolbox meetings held
• LOTO training
• Rigging training
• Contractor Vendor Orientation handouts updated
• Permit postings updated
• Sink postings updated

Includes findings, observations and
recommendations.
19
FO Tier I Program
20
Tier 1 Purpose

• Identify unsafe work conditions and/or poor
  environmental conditions of the work area and
  during work activities and to implement
  documented corrective actions to prevent
  recurrence. Assure compliance with EMS OHSAS
  metrics and requirements.
• Monitor worker assignments to ensure safe work
  practices and verify applicable procedures are
  being followed.
• Increase the safety and environmental awareness
  of individual employees by involving them in the
  inspection process.

21
Tier 1 Inspections

• Facility Inspections typical of BNLs OSHA type
  inspections. Evaluates area safety/environmental
  conditions, checklist provided.
• Jobsite Inspections Evaluate work practices,
  procedures, roving work area conditions,
  checklist provided.
• Vehicular Inspections newly instituted to
  address worker concerns over quality of vehicles
  and suitability for intended use. Includes SS
  auto mechanic for customer service purposes.
  Checklist developed, still in revision.

22
Results

• Integrated with BNLs Tier 1 trending data
  collection, some unique issues are also captured
  for EP. Includes ECR or WMR in process.
• Jobsite inspections are unique to FO and tracked
  in C/A database for trending by FO.
• Equipment inspections are under pilot
  implementation, shows improved commitment to
  worker issues and demonstrates continual
  improvement.
• 5 Formal Presentations to ALD each year

23
Tier 1 Facility Inspections

• FO Total Facility Inspections 291/yr
• FO Total Jobsite Inspections 25 /yr
• EP 20/yr
• SC 1/yr
• SS 4/yr
• Equipment Inspections
• EP 2/yr

24
FO Tier I Trends

• 2004
• 18 No deficiency
• 3 Observation

• 2005
• 79 No deficiency
• 89 Observation
• FO also trends
• Equipment/Vehicle
• General Safety
• Other
• Unsafe Practice

25
(No Transcript)
26
Environmental Performance
27
Significant Environmental Aspect Summary

• Regulated Industrial Waste
• Hazardous Waste
• Radioactive Waste
• Mixed Waste
• Regulated Medical Waste
• Atmosphere Discharges
• Liquid Discharge
• Chemical Storage non-rad
• Universal Waste
• Positive Aspects
• Waste Water Treatment
• Building Demolitions
• Recycling
• Green Purchasing
• LEEDS Certification

28
Ground Water Contamination

• Operate facilities in a manner that is protective
  of groundwater quality
• Sewage Treatment Plant (approximately 15 of
  treated water recharges directly to groundwater
  below filter beds)
• Major Petroleum Facility / Central Steam Facility
  (petroleum storage and transfer)
• Motor Pool (gasoline storage and vehicle
  maintenance)
• Service Station (gasoline storage and vehicle
  maintenance)
• Live Fire Range and Shotgun Range (Lead)
• Groundwater surveillance programs are in place at
  each facility. Annual monitoring costs
  45,000.
• Monitoring results indicate that current
  operational and engineered controls are
  effective. Routine detection of low-level
  contamination is from historical operations.

29
Spill Trends
NOTE Includes all spills (i.e., reportable to
any agency and non-reportable)
Decrease in spills during FY 2005 is attributed
to the a focus on spills, tool box discussions,
and a better understanding of what spills can be
managed/cleaned up immediately
30
Corrective Actions Resulting From Spills

• A diesel generator was stored on soil and its
  fuel tank overflowed due to thermal expansion
• Replace 10 rule with 75 as measured by fuel
  gauge, complete
• Designate temporary storage area 610, complete
• Develop a permanent storage area with
  containment, in work
• Communicate spill prevention practices to BNL
  employees engaged in fuel transfers, complete
• Develop and deliver a Spill prevention toolbox
  for EP, in work

31
SPDES

• SPDES Outfalls for which FO is responsible
• Outfall 001 (STP discharge to the Peconic River)
• Outfall 001E, (Boiler blow down from Bldg. 244,
  405, etc., reported by the Steam Shop quarterly
• Outfall 005 (Recharge Basin HS) receives
  predominately storm water runoff, minimal cooling
  tower blowdown and once-through cooling water
  from the NSLS, the Chemistry Department, and the
  EENS Department)
• Outfall 007 (Recharge Basin HX) receives filter
  backwash water from the Water Treatment Plant.
• Outfall 010 (Central Steam Facility (CSF)
  recharge basin) receives storm water runoff from
  the CSF area.

32
SPDES
33
SPDES

• FY 05 Exceedences
• Outfall 001 (STP discharge to the Peconic River)
• 2/7/05 total nitrogen concentration of 12.7
  mg/L, which exceeds the permit limit of 10 mg/L.
  Samples collected by the NYSDEC on February 8 had
  similar results of 11.3 mg/L. The composite
  samples collected on March 7 and 9, 2005 had
  total nitrogen concentrations of 13.3 and 9.3
  mg/L respectively.
• 3/7/05 total nitrogen concentration of 13.1
  mg/L, which exceeds the permit limit of 10 mg/L.
  The composite sample collected on March 9, 2005
  had a total nitrogen concentration of 9.3 mg/L.
• The cause of these exceedances was due to a
  normally closed primary valve from the primary
  clarified effluent channel that was leaking
  significantly. The valve body was separated from
  the wall of the concrete channel allowing treated
  wastewater to flow back into the effluent chamber
  from the secondary clarified.
• Corrective action was to temporarily repair the
  valve until it was permanently removed and the
  effluent piping plugged. The valve was not
  needed for routine operations.

34
SPDES

• FY 05 Exceedences
• Outfall 001 (STP discharge to the Peconic River)
• 2/4/5 Ammonia concentration of 3.7 mg/L, which
  exceeds the permit limit of 2 mg/L.
• Considered a one time excursion based on
  compliance of additional samples collected.
• May be related to previous condition

35
SPDES

• FY 05 Exceedences
• Outfall 001 (STP discharge to the Peconic River)
• 3/11/05 total copper concentration of 0.161
  mg/L, which exceeds the permit limit of 0.15
  mg/L. The composite sample collected on March
  23, 2005, had a total copper concentration of
  0.046 mg/L.
• Considered a one time excursion based on
  compliance of additional samples collected.
• Outfall 006A (HT Recharge Basins)
• 2/18/05 A sample collected had a pH of 9.39 SU
  which exceeds the permit limit of 9.0 SU. The pH
  was verified at 9.43 forty minutes later.
• The cause of the exceedances was due to an
  overdose of hydroxide by the EP Water Treatment
  Facility at one of the eastern wells. The
  problem had been corrected by EP.
• Corrective action was to improve Water Treatment
  Facility procedures to improve communication
  during abnormal occurrences and to address
  caustic additions.

36
Maintenance Critical to Environmental Compliance

• WWTF
• UV Bulb replacement - Every 2 years
• SCHREIBER Equipment
• DO Monitor
• Mechanical Components
• CSF
• Stack Monitoring Equipment
• Periodic Fireside Boiler Cleaning
• MOSF / CBS
• Containment Maintenance
• Storage tanks
• Planned inspections

37
Drinking Water

• Metals
• Iron
• Manganese
• Lead
• Sodium
• Rad
• Beta Particle Photon Activity
• Tritium

• Water Quality
• 140 parameters monitored
• 13 Parameters Detected
• Water Quality
• Chlorides
• Nitrates
• Color
• Sulfates
• Organics
• 1,1,1 TCA
• Haloacetic Acids (5)
• Trihalomethanes

No Violations - All below the MCL, at very low
concentrations
38
Recycling

• The goal was to maximize the amount of waste
  recycled
• The measure was
• Total tons of solid waste recycled X 100
• Total tons of solid waste generated
• 61.7 achieved in FY 05
• 48.1 in FY 04
• 37.52 in FY 03
• A tremendous amount of metal was recycled this
  FY, thereby significantly increasing the
  recycling percentage Future percentage values
  will probably not be this high.

39
FY 05 Environmental Improvements / Actions

• Purchased approximately 12,000 of mercury free
  replacement utility devices such as thermometers
  and thermostats (P2 funding). These units will
  be replaced in the field during EP maintenance.
• Replaced Halon 1211 fire extinguishers (P2
  funding)
• Cost shared in the following pollution prevention
  projects
• 901 regulator PCB draining
• 208 hopper demolition
• Replacement of the 490 animal bedding disposal
  system (note this installation work will
  continue through the beginning of 06)

40
FY 05 Environmental Improvements / Actions

• Purchased 5 aerosol can hole puncturing
  assemblies to minimize the generation of
  hazardous waste
• Installed SONOXIDE treatment on CCWF Cooling
  Tower (Reduced Biocide Use)
• Recovered 238 pounds of CFC-113 from the Building
  511 chiller this is a Class 1 Ozone Depleting
  Substance and helps the Lab to meet its EPA
  P-Track goal (P2 funding)

41
FY 05 Environmental Improvements / Actions

• Purchased an in ground oil/water separator, which
  will be installed during FY 06, to capture oils
  from a grounds vehicle wash to be located by the
  326 complex (P2 funding)
• Drained and disposed of 28 transformers, which
  were held as spare inventory, thereby minimizing
  the potential for spill or leaks.
• EP designed, manufactured and installed a
  contaminated waste tank for the Central Steam
  Facility. This allows the oil tube
  heating/cleaning condensate drains to be combined
  and flow through a simple type oil/water
  separator in case the tube develops a leak.

42
FY 06 Planned Improvements / Actions

• Mercury found in Nessler reagent used to
  determine ammonia levels in SPT. Test methods
  are being changed to eliminate its use.
• Title V stack testing at CSF
• Vehicle wash facility
• Continue installing mercury free utility devices
• Continue halon removal and disposal

43
Stake Holder ConcernsAir Monitoring

• Exceedances
• Three 6-minute exceedances due to soot blowing
  from 8/4 to 10/4 (57 operating days)
• Fifteen apparent 6-minute exceedances due to soot
  blowing from 7/18 to 8/3 (14 operating days)
• Action Taken to Improve Regulatory Compliance
• Changed the soot blowing cycle on Boiler 6 on
  8/4/05
• Boiler 6 has ten individual soot blower units
• Boiler 7 has four individual soot blower units
• Prior to 8/4/05 individual soot blowers operated
  in succession (no gaps)
• Beginning 8/4/05 there were 7-minute gaps between
  the start of individual soot blowers
• Boiler 7 did not operate

44
Stake Holder ConcernsDrinking Water

• Brown Water cannot be good
• Supplied water fine is low in iron
• Iron from distribution system and Building piping
• Water main and building Flushing
• Lead and Copper
• Run water until cold
• Change faucets and Pig Tails
• Water Fountains out of service
• Water must be bad
• Replacement of Water Fountains

45
Occupational Safety Health Performance
46
FY 04 Record of Decision Status

• Continue employee involvement in OSH programs
  through review and development of Job and
  Facility Risk Assessments
• Achieved (more details later on)
• Review existing processes and systems to focus
  resources on areas of highest risk to achieve
  FOs goals for safety and work performance
• Grouped training sessions to be held in January,
  to be piloted in Plant Engineering
• Working with RadCon to implement a Whole Body
  Count sampling program
• Working to right size other training
  requirements (e.g., Confined Space, Crane and
  Forklift Qualifications)
• Combine EMS and OSH Management Review into a
  single Management Review
• Happening today!!

47
FY 04 Record of Decision Status

• Implement training and qualification
  recommendations from the Material Handling
  Committee
• In progress (more details later on)
• Continue to monitor Traffic Safety performance
  measures
• Reviewed each quarter with FO ALD and Division
  management
• Part of management performance measures
• ESH coordinator to work with OMC and IH to ensure
  that supervisors better understand need for
  medical surveillance.
• Dr. Falco and John Peters provided a review of
  these requirements during FOs FY 04 Management
  Retreat

48
Activities(the short list)

• Recreation
• Fire alarm testing and repair
• Heavy equipment maintenance and operations
• Asbestos abatement
• Office work
• Housekeeping
• Emergency response
• Deliveries
• Food service
• Electrical distribution
• Electrical work
• Painting

• Driving
• Walking
• Using hand held tools, including powered tools
• Concrete and masonry work
• Troubleshooting and testing energized equipment
• Work in or near vehicle traffic
• Maintenance and work in manholes
• Work at heights
• Cabinetmaking
• Maintenance and repair of machinery / equipment
• Erection of scaffolds
• Carpentry
• Refrigeration, air conditioner and heating repair
  and maintenance
• Water treatment
• Waste water treatment
• Chilled water production

• Inspections
• Site Security
• Construction work
• Site maintenance
• Lamp cleaning
• Metal work
• Plumbing
• Rigging
• Material handling / lifting
• Pesticide application
• Steam distribution
• Machining
• Manufacturing
• Welding
• Metal work
• Custodial work
• Mail distribution
• Conference services
• Auto repair and service

49
Common Hazards

• Airborne particulates asbestos, lead, silica,
  etc.
• Animal / insect bites, scratches, stings
• Animal / rodent and bird droppings
• Asphyxiation / ODH
• Bloodborne pathogens
• Burns
• Cave-in while working in an excavation
• Confined space
• Cuts / scrapes / struck against
• Electrical energy
• Elevated areas
• Ergonomic hazards
• Fatigue
• Fire
• Hazardous or toxic material / chemical exposures

• Ionizing radiation exposure x-rays, neutron,
  gamma, beta
• Manual material handling, lifting / moving heavy
  objects, rigging
• Noise
• Non-ionizing radiation
• Obstructed / tight work space
• Poisonous plants
• Poor indoor air quality
• Potential energy overhead object
• Rotating parts
• Striking utility
• Temperature extremes
• Vehicle collision
• Walking / working surfaces

50
FY 2005 Days Away Restricted Transferred (DART)
DART Rate Days Away, Restricted, or
Transferred Cases x 200,000
Total Hours Worked
51
FY 2005 Total Recordable Case Rate (TRCR)
TRC Rate Total Recordable Cases x 200,000
Total Hours Worked
52
Five Year Injury Trend
53
FO Directorate Five Year Injury Trend
54
Emergency Services Five Year Injury Trend
First aid cases continue to be the result of
minor strains and sprains associated with day to
day movement (i.e., walking, bending and stepping
up). Continuous reinforcement from the Chief,
Deputy Chief, and Captains to work safely and be
careful is considered a significant contributor
to the Divisions excellent performance.
55
Central Fabrication Services Five Year Injury
Trend
There were no first aid cases in FY 05. Three
recordable cases were associated with hernias.
In addition, there were 2 non work related cases
of hernias within the Division. It is believed
that a majority of the hernias are related to the
aging work force.
56
Plant Engineering Five Year Injury Trend
57
Plant Engineering Improving Trends

• Recordable 2004 (26) to (13)
• DART 2004 (15) to 2005 (7)
• First Aids 2004 (15) to 2005 (19)
• DAW RWD performance

• Overall decline in lost and restricted work days
  comparing quarters.
• OHSAS implemented during 2004 in Quarter 1.
• Significant reduction in end of calendar year and
  winter months.
• BNL efforts with snow removal seem to make a
  difference.

58
Plant Engineering 2004-2005 Troublesome
Activities

• 18 Walking-related (11 recordable)
• 2004 -2005 164 RWD, 277 DAW
• 2005 Total RWDDAW 78 days
• 10 Work w/o PPE (1 eyes - 4 DAW)
• 6 Repetitive work motion (4 recordable)
• 2 cases 4 LWD 180 LWD
• 6 Lift Lower (1 case 48 LWD)
• 11 Push Pull/Reach (1 case 16 LWD)

59
Safeguards Security Five Year Injury Trend

• First aid cases continue to be associated with
  routine activities, i.e., walking, pushing and
  pulling
• Improvements incorporated as a result of Tier I
  inspections and employee feedback have enhanced
  the safety program at Safeguards Security.
  Recordable cases have been reduced by 60 from FY
  04.

60
Staff Services Five Year Injury Trend
Slips and falls continues to be the most
recurring injury mode, with lifting, pushing and
pulling second.
61
Actions From Safety Health Investigations

• Injury investigations are conducted with line
  management involvement
• Actions tracked to completion in the FO FATS
• Summary of actions
• Performed ergonomic reviews
• Toolbox presentations
• Repair / maintenance
• Reviewed procedures with supervisors and
  identified tools needed
• Revised procedures
• Conducted IH monitoring
• Provided new postings
• Changed PPE requirements
• Update risk assessments

62
OHSAS Program Performance

• We currently have 189 Job Risk Assessments
• During FY 2005
• 15 Risk assessment updated
• 39 New added
• 22 added for Staff Services
• 15 in process
• Goal was to update / add / review 48 by end of FY
• 54 was achieved
• With the current total of 189 Job Risk
  Assessments and the additional ones that will be
  generated by the remaining Divisions we must be
  aggressive in reviewing these assessments to
  achieve the 3 year review cycle.
• Every risk assessment and subsequent revisions
  involve worker participation.

63
OHSAS Program Performance

• Improvements Resulting from Risk Assessments
• Machine Safety
• 9 new JRAs
• Shop Safety Procedure created
• Polishing Procedure developed
• Guarding developed and implemented
• Safety Zones created around machines with moving
  tables
• Signage improved
• Training conducted
• Revised sign changing procedure at main gate

64
OHSAS Program Performance

• Improvements Resulting from Risk Assessments
• Re-designed the Cooling Tower to reduce back
  strain to workers during maintenance operations
• Provided workers with spiky shoe covers to
  prevent slips in snow and ice
• Installed a ramp at building 479
• Clarified use and type of PPE
• Implemented process to allow workers to use
  bee/wasp spray
• Stocking tick spray in tool crib

65
OHSAS Program Performance

• Improvements Resulting from Risk Assessments
• Installed signage warning of slip hazards
• Purchased self propelled mechanical scraper to
  remove rugs
• Various toolboxes on safety issues
• Eye wash stations installed
• Restricted use of certain vehicles during
  inclement weather
• Started salting truck decks when icy

66
OHSAS Program Performance

• Improvements Resulting from Risk Assessments
• Updated safety procedures for
• Inspections
• Use of fall protection
• Manlifts usage
• LOTO when working within 10 foot area of power
  line
• Restrict use of Manlifts based on weather
  conditions
• Created a procedure for Fuel Truck Loading and
  dispensing
• Improved catwalk ladder way at fuel truck loading
  and dispensing area
• Purchase ergonomically safety tools for interior
  painting

67
Other Improvements / Actions Taken

• Implemented a certification program for gas
  cylinders purchased from vendors to eliminate the
  possibility of contamination
• Conducted 100 noise surveys within FO
• Air quality assessments were conducted by FO in
  the BNL mail room and fire house resulting in
  several corrective actions (i.e., improving
  ventilation, portable air cleaner, improved house
  cleaning, etc.)
• Additional resources dedicated to snow / ice
  removal to reduce slips and falls on-site,
  600,000 was spent in FY 2005 over last year.

68
Other Improvements / Actions Taken

• All Apartment area steps, landings and rails were
  assessed/inspected and repairs implemented, as
  needed.
• As a result of a dust hazard identified by
  electricians in the Apartments electrical
  baseboard heating a cleaning program was
  implemented
• Replaced incandescent work lights in the motor
  pool with portable LED lamps to remove hazard
  potential caused by incandescent bulbs near fuel
  and trip hazard by their cords

69
Employee Concerns (Just a few)

• Wet floors from mopping during peak use time in
  452
• Cleaning moved to non-peak time
• Securement of equipment of contractors vehicle
• Securement was found to be acceptable
• Fall hazard from climbing over a railing from a
  Manlift to access a platform
• A gate was installed
• Confined Space Gas Monitors being used after
  hours without Bump test/Calibration
• Automated Bump test/Calibration equipment
  purchased and personnel trained in its use.
• Icy walkway in front of entrance door to AGS
  circle
• Rain gutter installed to prevent water runoff and
  freezing on the walkway
• Disconnecting means for the outside Unit at
  Building 480 (not within sight of the equipment
  door and tinted windows block the view)
• New outdoor disconnects installed to facilitate
  LOTO when servicing equipment

70
Other Stakeholder Concerns

• Injuries from sports
• Replaced bases in softball fields to a design
  that would reduce injury when sliding into them
• Added padded wall mats in gym
• Added safety padding to Referee stand
• Installed non-skid flooring around pool
• Replaced worn park benches
• Improved cleaning and sanitation in locker rooms
  with the an upgrade in custodial equipment
• Power washer
• Floor scrubber
• Vacuum
• Voltage converts for foreign visitors made
  available at the Housing Office and at the BERA
  store.

71
Noise Surveys

• Identified all areas owned by FO and work
  performed
• Prioritized the list by identifying the highest
  risk areas and tasks
• Plan developed, all Divisions were included in
  surveys
• Results entered into Compliance Suite
• Corrective Actions added into FO FATS
• 100 Surveys completed

72
Hoisting and Rigging Improvements

• Personnel Development
• Utilizing outside vendor training services
• Provided securement training to all OM Site
  personnel
• 40 Hour rigging training to all Riggers and 2
  Heavy Equipment Maintenance Operators (HEMOs)
• Mobile crane training for selected HEMOs
• Skill enhancement training for Master Rigger and
  qualified 7 new Master Riggers
• Developing a qualification standard for each
  Rigger and HEMO
• Equipment
• Periodic material handling equipment inspections
  are now being performed
• Reorganized the rigging equipment area and
  created a rigging loft
• Load testing all cranes
• Phasing out old equipment

73
Actions Planned for FY 06

• Strive to continue to lower injury rates
• ZERO INJURIES IS OUR GOAL!
• Create a directorate procedure for working on or
  near roads
• OHSAS
• Achieve OHSAS 18001 registration for Staff
  Services
• Continue implement OHSAS 18001
• Emergency Services
• Safeguards Security
• Procurement Property Management
• Implement the use of Ground Penetrating Radar for
  excavations
• Continue implementing hoisting and rigging
  improvements
• Continue closing OSHA action items

74
FY 2005 Cost Summary
75
FO FY 05 Cost Summary
76
Sr. Management Evaluation
77
Sr. Management Questions

• Are the Management Systems effective in achieving
  policy commitments?

78
Sr. Management Questions

• Are the Management Systems effective in achieving
  objectives, targets and performance measures?

79
Sr. Management Questions

• Are the Management Systems adequate in terms of
• Identifying significant aspects, hazards and
  impacts?
• Resource allocation?
• Information systems?
• Organizational issues staff expertise
  procedural requirements?
• If yes, record the decision in no record
  recommendations

80
Sr. Management Questions

• Are the objectives, targets and performance
  measures for these management systems suitable in
  terms of
• Injuries / illnesses and environmental impacts?
• Concerns of stakeholders?
• Current and future regulatory requirements?
• Business interests technological capability?
• Internal organizational or process changes?
• Should additional objectives, targets or
  performance measures be established?
• If yes, record the decision in no record
  recommendations

81
Sr. Management Questions

• Recommended revisions to
• ESSH policy and commitments?
• Objectives, Targets and Performance Measures?
• Occupational safety and health or environmental
  related management systems?
• If yes, record the decision in no record
  recommendations

82
Any remaining issues?
83
Thank you for your participation!