Investigating the Relationship Between O*NET Skill and Ability Ratings and Job Analyst Cognitive Ability and Conscientiousness - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Investigating the Relationship Between O*NET Skill and Ability Ratings and Job Analyst Cognitive Ability and Conscientiousness

Description:

1. Investigating the Relationship Between O*NET Skill and Ability Ratings and ... vs. Task-based system in DOT. Ability judgments require greater abstract reasoning ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: frederick1
Learn more at: https://www.msu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Investigating the Relationship Between O*NET Skill and Ability Ratings and Job Analyst Cognitive Ability and Conscientiousness


1
Investigating the Relationship Between ONET
Skill and Ability Ratings and Job Analyst
Cognitive Ability and Conscientiousness
  • Frederick P. Morgeson Kelly Delaney-Klinger
  • Michigan State University
  • Donald Truxillo
  • Portland State University
  • Download the slides at http//www.msu.edu/morges
    on/

2
Potential Inaccuracy in ONET
  • Ability-based system
  • vs. Task-based system in DOT
  • Ability judgments require greater abstract
    reasoning
  • Harvey (1991) Morgeson Campion (2000)
  • Morgeson, Delaney-Klinger, Mayfield, Ferrara,
    Campion
  • (In press)

3
Impact of Individual Differences
  • Whats Been Studied
  • Age, sex, race
  • Experience level, education level
  • Whats Been Ignored
  • General Cognitive Ability
  • Conscientiousness

4
Our Contributions
  • Examine link between job analyst cognitive
    ability and conscientiousness and ONET skill and
    ability ratings
  • If there is a problemwhat could we do?
  • Identify potential strategy for reducing
    relationships

5
Method
  • Participants
  • 322 undergraduate business students
  • Job analysis training
  • Experience with job (M 10 prior business
    classes)
  • Overall Activity
  • Made ratings of the job of a teacher in the
    business school

6
Method, cont.
  • Experimental Design

Condition 1 ONET Skills Abilities Wonderlic NE
O - C
Condition 2 Task Ratings ONET Skills
Wonderlic NEO - C
Condition 3 Task Ratings ONET
Abilities Wonderlic NEO-C
7
Item Example-Skill
  • Reading Comprehension Understanding written
    sentences and paragraphs in work related
    documents.
  • How important is READING COMPREHENSION to the
    performance of the job of a teacher in the
    business school? (1-5 Not important to
    Extremely Important)
  • What level of READING COMPREHENSION is needed to
    perform the job of a teacher in the business
    school? (1-7)
  • Anchors
  • 2 Read step-by-step instructions for completing
    a form
  • 4 Read a memo from management describing new
    personnel policies
  • 6 Read a scientific journal article describing
    surgical procedures

8
Item Example - Ability
  • Oral Expression The ability to communicate
    information and ideas in speaking so others will
    understand.
  • How important is ORAL EXPRESSION to the
    performance of the job of a teacher in the
    business school? (1-5 Not important to
    Extremely Important)
  • What level of ORAL EXPRESSION is needed to
    perform the job of a teacher in the business
    school? (1-7)
  • Anchors
  • 2 Cancel newspaper delivery by phone
  • 4 Give instructions to a lost motorist
  • 6 Explain advanced principles of genetics to
    college freshmen

9
Item Example-Task Categories
Categories of TEACHING-RELATED Activities Items
Developing and Maintaining a Syllabus 8
Course Preparation 20
Class Administration and Participation 13
In-Class Activities 9
General Grading Activities 11
Managing Teaching Assistants 15
Developing and Administering Exams 18
World-Wide Web 7
Relationship with Students 13
Professionalism 5
Course Evaluations 5
10
Results-Skills
  • 19 of 140 correlations significant (13.57)
  • Exposure to tasks before skill ratings decreased
    relationships (14 of 19 were reduced)
  • Samples

ONet Only ONet Only Task ONET Task ONET
ONET Descriptor g Consc. g Consc.
Speaking Imp. .28 .13 .06 .06
Speaking Lev. .27 .17 .18 .03
Serv. Orien. Imp. .11 .25 -.12 .07
Serv. Orien. Lev. .02 .25 -.02 -.01
11
Results-Abilities
  • 58 of 208 correlations significant (27.88)
  • Exposure to tasks before skill ratings decreased
    relationships (48 of 58 were lower)
  • Samples

ONet Only ONet Only Task ONET Task ONET
ONET Descriptor g Consc. g Consc.
Oral Comp. Lev. .16 .20 -.06 -.08
Oral Comp. Imp. .15 .23 .14 -.04
Prob. Sensitivity Lev. -.20 .30 .02 -.07
Math. Reason. Lev. .13 .28 -.08 .13
12
Conclusions
  • Ability ratings are more susceptible to influence
    of individual differences
  • Giving detailed task information helped reduce
    impact of individual differences on ratings
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com