NSF Web Site: www'nsf'gov - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

NSF Web Site: www'nsf'gov

Description:

... disabilities, are essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. ... Interdisciplinary Research with a strong Physics component ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:194
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: holl146
Category:
Tags: nsf | gov | nsf | site | web | www

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NSF Web Site: www'nsf'gov


1
NSF the Physics Division
National Science Foundation
  • NSF Web Site www.nsf.gov

Kathy McCloud Physics (PHY) kmccloud_at_nsf.gov
2
NSF Strategic Goals
  • Discovery
  • Foster research that will advance the frontiers
    of knowledge, emphasizing areas of greatest
    opportunity and potential benefit and
    establishing the nation as a global leader in
    fundamental and transformational SE.
  • Learning
  • Cultivate a world-class, broadly inclusive SE
    workforce, and expand the scientific literacy of
    all citizens
  • Research Infrastructure
  • Build the nations research capability through
    critical investments in advanced instrumentation,
    facilities, cyberinfrastructure, and experimental
    tools.

National Science Foundation
3
National Science Foundation
National Science Foundation
4
Directorate forMathematical and Physical Sciences
National Science Foundation
5
PHY Web Site http//www.nsf.gov/physics Most
Have Target Date Sept. 24, 2009 PIF, Plasma
Target Date Oct. 22, 2009 Physics of Living
Systems DEADLINE July 31, 2009 CHECK
TARGET DATES/DEADLINES
Kathy McCloud kmcloud_at_nsf.gov
6
Division of Materials Research
  • Individual Investigator Programs
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Condensed Matter and Materials Theory
  • Biomaterials
  • Solid-State and Materials Chemistry
  • Polymers
  • Metallic Materials and Nanostructures
  • Ceramics
  • Electronic and Photonic Materials
  • Include within IIP
  • FRG
  • RUI
  • GOALI

National Science Foundation
Annual submission window Opens Third
Monday in September Closes First Friday in
November -gt HARD DEADLINE (Opens Sept. 21, 2009
Closes Nov. 6, 2009) check DMR
website STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT EARLY IN
WINDOW
7
Division of Astronomical Sciences
The NSF Division of Astronomical Sciences is the
steward of ground-based astronomical research in
the United States The Division supports research
in all areas of astronomy and astrophysics and
related multidisciplinary studies.
National Science Foundation
  • Modes of support include,
  • single-investigator and collaborative awards,
  • funding for acquisition and development of
    astronomical instrumentation,
  • technology development for future ground-based
    facilities,
  • educational projects that leverage the Division's
    research investments to build research and
    workforce capacity and to increase scientific
    literacy.

http//www.nsf.gov/astronomy
8
Proposal WritingBefore You Place Pen to Paper
National Science Foundation
  • Search the Award Database
  • Investigate Program Websites
  • Read Appropriate Solicitation
  • Contact the Program Director
  • One or two paragraph describing projects
  • Possible phone call to talk about the project
  • Possible co-review if inter/cross-disciplinary

9
Finding Information
Award Search on http//www.nsf.gov
National Science Foundation
10
Proposal WritingBefore You Place Pen to Paper II
In Program Announcement/Solicitation, look for
National Science Foundation
  • Goal of Program
  • Eligibility
  • Special proposal preparation and/or award
    requirements
  • Deadlines/Target dates/ Submission windows
  • Pre/Full proposal

11
Things to consider
  • Why do it?
  • Why you and not someone else?
  • Uniqueness of research, educational
    opportunities, available facilities...
  • What are your strengths?
  • Capture the reviewers attention in the summary
    and introduction. Make them want to read more.
  • YOU must convince the reviewer you are worthy of
    funding
  • Express yourself clearly
  • Its not the reviewers job to figure out what
    you are trying to accomplish and why

National Science Foundation
12
Proposal Preparation
Useful Publications
  • Proposal Award Policies Procedures Guide
    (PAPP) NSF 08-1 (starting Jan. 2009 use NSF
    09-1) 
  • Combination of the Grant Proposal Guide (GPG) and
    the Award Administration Guide (AAG)
  • Contains guidelines for all proposals (except
    when program solicitation stipulates otherwise)
  • Provides guidance for Award process, from
    issuance and administration through closeout
  • Describes NSF organizations and offices most
    relevant to grantees
  • Provides a list of Statutes and Executive Orders
    referenced in PAPP

National Science Foundation
13
Potential Pitfalls
  • Formatting NEW FONTS SPECIFIED
  • References
  • See Grant Proposal Guide Chapter II, Section C.2e
  • All Authors, Titles of Articles
  • Biographical Sketch
  • See Grant Proposal Guide Chapter II, Section
    C.2f.
  • Collaborators, Advisors, Advisees
  • Intellectual Merit Broader Impact in Project
    Summary
  • Project Description
  • Results from Prior NSF support
  • Post Doc Mentoring
  • Human Subjects (Require IRB approval)

National Science Foundation
Non-conforming proposals may be returned without
review!!!
14
Merit Review Criteria
  • 1. What is the intellectual merit of the
    proposed activity?
  • How important is the proposed activity to
    advancing knowledge and understanding within its
    own field or across different fields? How well
    qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to
    conduct the project? (If appropriate, please
    comment on the quality of prior work.) To what
    extent does the proposed activity suggest and
    explore creative, original, or potentially
    transformative concepts? How well conceived and
    organized is the proposed activity? Is there
    sufficient access to the necessary resources?
  • 2. What are the broader impacts of the proposed
    activity?
  • How well does the activity advance discovery and
    understanding while promoting teaching, training,
    and learning? How well does the proposed activity
    broaden the participation of underrepresented
    groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability,
    geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance
    the infrastructure for research and education,
    such as facilities, instrumentation, networks,
    and partnerships? Will the results be
    disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and
    technological understanding? What may be the
    benefits of the proposed activity to society?

National Science Foundation
15
Last suggestions
  • Dont wait until the deadline to submit
  • Download and Print the PDF file after finishing
    and double-check the font size, diagrams, etc
  • Different Program Officers may handle things
    differently but you are always safer if you
    follow GPG and solicitation guidelines
  • Get someone else (with experience) to read the
    proposal, and leave your ego behind

National Science Foundation
16
Funding Decisions Review Criteria
  • 1. What is the intellectual merit of the
    proposed activity?
  • How important is the proposed activity to
    advancing knowledge and understanding within its
    own field or across different fields? How well
    qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to
    conduct the project? (If appropriate, please
    comment on the quality of prior work.) To what
    extent does the proposed activity suggest and
    explore creative, original, or potentially
    transformative concepts? How well conceived and
    organized is the proposed activity? Is there
    sufficient access to the necessary resources?
  • 2. What are the broader impacts of the proposed
    activity?
  • How well does the activity advance discovery and
    understanding while promoting teaching, training,
    and learning? How well does the proposed activity
    broaden the participation of underrepresented
    groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability,
    geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance
    the infrastructure for research and education,
    such as facilities, instrumentation, networks,
    and partnerships? Will the results be
    disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and
    technological understanding? What may be the
    benefits of the proposed activity to society?

National Science Foundation
17
Funding Decisions
Along with the advice provided by
reviewers/panels, NSF staff will give careful
consideration to the following in making funding
decisions Integration of Research and
Education One of the principal strategies
in support of NSF's goals is to foster
integration of research and education through the
programs, projects and activities it supports at
academic and research institutions.
Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs,
Projects, and Activities Broadening
opportunities and enabling the participation of
all citizens, women and men, underrepresented
minorities, and persons with disabilities, are
essential to the health and vitality of science
and engineering. NSF is committed to this
principle of diversity and deems it central to
the programs, projects, and activities it
considers and supports.
National Science Foundation
18
If Declined
  • Dont lose heart but try again
  • Common Reasons for Declination
  • Trust-me proposal,
  • Incremental contribution,
  • Weak educational component,
  • Expertise gaps, Insufficient fund / time
    request,
  • Not a good fit in the program,
  • Bad luck Funding limitations, timing, program
    balance
  • Read Reviews and Panel Summary
  • consider comments ( and -), suggestions
  • Talk to the Program Director
  • Revise proposal and submit again
  • Try to express yourself more clearly the next
    time
  • Dont assume same set of reviewers

19
Award and Reports
  • Award management PI and SRO ( NSF)
  • Acknowledge NSF support
  • (presentations, publication, press
    releases)
  • 2. Communicate significant accomplishments to PD
  • (e.g. Nature/Science articles, press
    releases, etc.)
  • 3. Submit reports on time (Annual Report 90
    days prior to anniversary date Final Report 90
    days after award expiration)
  • An overdue report will delay the processing of
    pending recommendations and increments. (PIs and
    co-PIs)
  • Pay attention to special reporting requirements
    REU, CAREER, Post-Doc Mentoring (new)
  • Deliver highlights of work as requested/needed
  • (DMR requests 2 page power-point slides
    annually)

20
Other Funding Opportunities



  • Faculty Early Career Development Program (CAREER)
  • Research in Undergraduate Institutions (RUI)
  • Major Research Instrumentation (MRI)
  • Research Experience for Undergraduates Sites and
    Supplements (REU)
  • Research Opportunity Awards (ROA)
  • Grant Opportunities for Academic Liaison with
    Industry (GOALI)
  • Small Grant for Exploratory Research (SGER) gt
  • Grants for Rapid Response research (RAPID)
  • Early-concept Grants for Exploratory Research
    (EAGER)

National Science Foundation
21
CAREER

Faculty Early Career Development Program NSF
08-557
National Science Foundation
Find Link on Crosscutting Programs Page
  • NSFs most prestigious awards in support of
    junior faculty exemplifying the role of
    teacher-scholar
  • Enhances and emphasizes the importance of
    balanced academic careers
  • Career development plan to integrate research and
    education

22
CAREER
  • ELIGIBILTY
  • As of Directorate Deadline
  • Hold doctorate in field supported by NSF
  • Be untenured
  • Not previously received an NSF PECASE or CAREER
    award
  • Have not competed more than two times in NSF
    CAREER Program
  • As of October 1 of submission year be employed
  • In a tenure-track (or equivalent) position at US
    academic institution or US non-profit, non-degree
    granting organization
  • As an Assistant Professor (or equivalent)
  • ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS WITH or WITHOUT TENURE ARE
    NOT ELIGIBLE


National Science Foundation
23
CAREER

  • SIZE
  • Lower Limit 400K (total)
  • Upper Limit - non specified
  • BIO Directorate 500K (total) minimum
  • DURATION
  • 5 Years
  • SUPPLEMENTS
  • Standard NSF supplements (see GPG)
  • PECASE
  • HONORARY ONLY

National Science Foundation
24
CAREER


National Science Foundation
  • DEPARTMENTAL ENDORSEMENT LETTER
  • (About One Page)
  • Returned without Review if Missing
  • LETTERS OF COMMITMENT/COLLABORATION
  • (if needed)
  • Short
  • Describe collaborative efforts
  • Not recommendation/endorsement

25
CAREER
  • DEADLINES
  • July 23, 2009 for MPS, GEO, SBE, OPP
  • July 22, 2009 for ENG
  • July 21, 2009 for BIO, CISE, EHR
  • FASTLANE Submission
  • Help desk 1-800-673-6188
  • GRANTS.GOV Submission
  • Grants.gov User Support 1-800-518-4826

National Science Foundation
26
Education and Interdisciplinary Research Physics
Division
  • Physics Education Research and Curriculum
    Development
  • Research Experience for Undergraduates
  • Research Experience for Teachers
  • Interdisciplinary Research with a strong Physics
    component
  • Projects focused on Physics and Education
    QuarkNet, CHEPRIO, PhysTEC, and others
  • Programs aimed at increasing participation in
    physics by women, under-represented minorities,
    and persons with disabilities

National Science Foundation
27
Physics Education Research and Curriculum
Development
  • Target date September 26
  • Supports activities that seek to improve the
    education and
  • training of physics students (both
    undergraduate and
  • graduate), such as curriculum development for
    upper-level
  • physics courses

National Science Foundation
28
Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) -
sites and supplements
  • Undergraduates spend from 6 10 weeks at a
    university (usually not their home institution
    for REU sites)
  • Research with a faculty mentor
  • Students receive stipend (450 per week)
  • Most have graduate school prep (sites)

National Science Foundation
90 of students involved in an SRI study of
undergraduate research stated that undergraduate
research experiences had a role in career
decisions (67 increased interest in a career in
research, 21 decreased)
29
RET supplements and sites
  • K-12 Teachers spend 6-8 weeks at a university
  • Research with a faculty mentor
  • Guidance in introducing research topic into
    classroom

National Science Foundation
The 5 QuarkNet teachers participating in the
University of Michigan Quarknet-CERN Research
Experience for Teachers Program in 2007. From
left to right Peter Grach, Stacy McCormack, Jack
Willis, Shane Wood, and Marla Glover. 
30
Physics and Education Projects
  • QuarkNet Large Hadron Collider (LHC) physics
    and teachers
  • CHEPREO - Center for High-Energy Physics Research
    and Educational Outreach
  • PhysTEC initiative from APS, AAPT, and AIP to
    improve physics teacher preparation
  • LIGO Science Education Center (Livingston,
    Louisiana) in conjunction with Southern
    University of Baton Rouge. Searching for
    gravitational waves

National Science Foundation
FIU (CHEPREO) graduate students (Luis Lebolo)
shown installing temperature and humidity sensors
for CMS at CERN.
31
NSF Updates by EMail

Sign up to find out about NEW program
announcements of INTEREST to YOU.
National Science Foundation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com