Title: UNFCCC Workshop on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries 30080192006, Rome,
1UNFCCCWorkshop on Reducing Emissions from
Deforestation in Developing Countries30/08-01/9/2
006, Rome, Italy
- Overview of scientific, socio-economic, technical
and methodological issues
Sandra Brown sbrown_at_winrock.org
2Much progress in the last 10 years.
- Remote sensing data at various scales readily
available and methods and tools have been
developed and for estimating and monitoring
carbon emissions from tropical deforestation and
degradation - Change in land cover for most tropical regions
can be measured from space with confidence, but
measuring forest degradation from satellites is
more technically challenging - Peer reviewed tools and methods available using
field measurements to estimate carbon stocks in
forests with high confidence. - Methods for estimating net and gross emissions
from deforestation/degradation are available in
existing IPCC reports (1996, 2003, 2006)
3Definitions
Forest Definition (annex to decision 16/CMP.1 of
Kyoto Protocol) Minimum forest area 0.05 1
ha Minimum tree height 2 5 m Minimum crown
cover 10 30
Degradation (from IPCC) Direct, human-induced,
long-term loss persisting for X years or more
or at least Y of forest carbon stocks since time
T not qualifying as deforestation
Deforestation Direct, human-induced conversion
of forested land to non-forested land
4Application of definitions
Crown cover
10
80
30
0
Carbon stocks in t C/ha
40
12
1
120
Deforestation ?C 80
30
Devegetation
Degradation
Deforestation ?C 108
10
Degradation
Devegetation
5Drivers of deforestation and degradation as
reported in national communications to the UNFCCC
6Steps involved in a C monitoring system for
deforestation
DeFries et al. 2006.
Forest inventories In-situ/plot
data-projects Targeted remote surveyse.g. Lidar
and aerial imagery FAO statistics IPCC-GPG / AFOLU
7Monitoring change in forest cover
- Remote sensing data available for many land cover
changes and many developing countries since 1990s
and deforestation can be measured from space with
confidence - Not all areas covered cloud cover issues for
some key tropical countries - Identification of secondary forestsnot easy
- Identification of degraded forests developing
- Identification of selectively logged forest
developing - Development of new technology and new analytical
methods in RS field progressing for addressing
these challenges and likely to be available for
future monitoring
8Monitoring carbon stocks
- Need to match estimates of carbon stocks with
changes in land cover to improve accuracy and
precision of emission estimates - Current operational optical satellites cannot
remotely sense biomass carbon - Optical satellites have difficulty in
distinguishing secondary from mature forests, yet
carbon stocks can differ greatly because of
effects of age and ecological zone
9How are forest biomass C stocks in the tropics
presently assessed?
- Robust tools exist for converting traditional,
statistically designed forest inventory data to
carbon stocks in trees use defaults for other
pools (IPCC GPG Ch. 3 FAO) - Majority of tropical countries have no recent
national forest inventories - Research plots generally insufficient as not
from population of interest and designed for
other purposes
10(No Transcript)
11How to measure carbon stocks ?
- Traditional inventory approach
- Can be done in smaller countries and at project
scale - Requires large resources at national level
- Cost-prohibitive for large countries and not
practical - Need remote means that are
- Cost-effective
- Low uncertainty (high precision)
- Transparent and repeatable
- Acceptable to policy makers
12Future trends in measuring and monitoring carbon
stocks for DD
- Build on existing techniquesregular
inventories done by sampling - Need remote means
- Not necessary for wall-to-wall mapping but
statistical sampling approach - New remote technology developing
- Lidar already shown to measure changes in forest
structure height is a good indicator of forest
biomass change - High resolution digital imagery combined with new
field data on key metrics of forest carbon-crown
area and tree height
13Conclusions
- Analysis of airborne or satellite remotely sensed
data is the only practical approach to measure
changes in DD at national and international
scales. - Since the early 1990s, tools and methods exist to
measure changes in forest area from space with
confidence. - Measuring forest degradation from satellites is
more technically challenging but methods are
becoming available. - There are no accepted standard practices for
measuring forest carbon stocks using RS data
instead they are estimated from traditional
forest inventories or from default data. - Investments are required to expand inventories of
forest carbon stocks so that reliable carbon
estimates can be applied to deforested and
degraded areas interpreted from RS imagery. - New technologies and approaches are developing
for monitoring changes in carbon stocks with
confidence using a combination of satellite and
airborne imagery.
14Conclusions (cont.)
- Methods for estimating net and gross emissions
from areas with measurable DD are available in
existing IPCC 1996 GHG inventory methods, the
2003 GPG-LULUCF and the pending IPCC AFOLU. - Reliable and transparent results from application
of these methods are hampered by capacity,
availability, and access to data on both change
in forest cover and, more critically, by change
in carbon stocks - NEXT STEPS
- Development of standard protocols for
interpreting and analyzing remote sensing data at
various scales, including which data to collect
and use, how to analyze the data, and acceptable
levels of accuracy to attain, etc (akin to GPG
for C stocks for LULUCF) - Development of standard protocols for estimating
carbon stocks of forests undergoing change at
national scales, building on existing methods
given in IPCC reports, and decisions on
acceptable levels of accuracy and precision to
attain.