Research Issues in Children - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Loading...

PPT – Research Issues in Children PowerPoint presentation | free to view - id: 80559-ZDc1Z



Loading


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation
Title:

Research Issues in Children

Description:

Research Issues in Children's Palliative Care. Dr Nicola Eaton ... 'Palliative care is an active and total approach to care, embracing physical, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: cdn4
Category:

less

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Research Issues in Children


1
Research Issues in Childrens Palliative Care
  • Dr Nicola Eaton
  • Director of Childrens Palliative Care and
    Complex Needs Research

2
Introduction
  • Size and nature of the problem
  • Literature review
  • Research programme
  • Education programme
  • Future research

3
Childrens Palliative Care and Complex Needs
Research Team
  • Dr Antonia Beringer, Research Fellow
  • Mary Lewis, Research Associate
  • Ann OBrien, Research Associate
  • Collaborators include
  • Dr Simon Lenton Sonia Ezergailis (ACH)
  • Dr Fiona Finlay Lizzie Chambers (ACT)
  • Vineeta Gupta Dr Nicky Harris (CHSW)
  • Jacky McCallum CPC Teams around England

4
Palliative Care Research
  • Most research into palliative care is with adults
  • Most research into childrens palliative care is
    with children with cancer
  • For children with non malignant conditions there
    is little research evidence

5
Definition of Childrens Palliative Care
  • Palliative care is an active and total
    approach to care, embracing physical, emotional,
    social, and spiritual elements. It focuses on
    enhancement of quality of life for the child and
    support for the family and includes the
    management of physical symptoms, provision of
    respite, and care following death and
    bereavement. It is provided for children for whom
    curative treatment is no longer an option and may
    extend over many years. ACT/RCPCH (2003)
  • (ACT Association for Childrens Palliative
    Care)

6
ACT Groups
  1. Life-threatening conditions for which curative
    treatment may be feasible but can fail, where
    access to palliative care services may be
    necessary when treatment fails. Children in long
    term remission or following successful curative
    treatment are not included. E.g. cancer,
    irreversible organ failure
  2. Conditions where premature death is inevitable,
    where there may be long periods of intensive
    treatment aimed at prolonging life and allowing
    participation in normal activities. E.g. cystic
    fibrosis
  3. Progressive conditions where curative treatment
    is exclusively palliative and may extend over
    many years. E.g. Batten disease,
    mucopolysaccharidoses, muscular dystrophy
  4. Irreversible but non progressive conditions
    causing severe disability leading to
    susceptibility to health complications and
    premature death. E.g. severe cerebral palsy,
    multiple disabilities such as following brain or
    spinal cord injury

7
Size of the problem
  • Estimates of the prevalence of non-malignant life
    threatening illness in childhood
  • Cross sectional survey of children 0-19 years in
    Bath clinical area (total population 411,000)
  • Identified 123 children prevalence of 1.2 per
    1000 (4 times greater than previous estimates)
  • (Lenton et al 2000)

8
Prevalence data
  • Northern Ireland 1.72 per 1000 (exclude
    malignant disease and it is 1.52 per 1000)
  • Calderdale and Kirklees 1.62 per 1,000
  • South Glamorgan 1 per 1000
  • No national register (as in Cancer)

9
Models of care
  • Hospital
  • Palliative care often seen as defeat or giving
    up
  • Most children want to die at home but only a few
    do
  • Care providers should recognise a need for
    palliative care, assess emotional and spiritual
    needs of the child and family and facilitate
    advance care planning, assess and manage childs
    pain and symptoms, and provide bereavement care

10
  • Hospice
  • Hospice movement now 39 with 4 hospice at home
    and 1 day care service
  • Not like adult hospices home from home
  • Respite care mainly
  • Sibling and family support

11
  • Home/community
  • CCN teams (generalist)
  • Palliative care teams e.g. Lifetime
  • BLF funding in 2003 (48m)

12
Disease groups likely to be on a service caseload
  • Metabolic conditions
  • e.g. mucopolysaccharidoses
  • Diseases of the nervous system
  • e.g. cerebral palsy, Batten disease, spinal
    muscular atrophy (sma), Duchenne muscular
    dystrophy
  • Cardiac anomalies
  • Respiratory disorders
  • e.g. cystic fibrosis
  • Chromosomal disorders
  • e.g.Edwards syndrome
  • Diseases of the immune system
  • e.g. HIV
  • Trauma
  • Accidental and non-accidental injuries

13
Review of the research literature
  • Clinical Care
  • Satisfaction with services
  • Quality of life
  • Parental mental health
  • Respite care
  • Child as participant
  • Siblings
  • End of Life care
  • Community Childrens Nursing Teams

14
Clinical care
  • Symptom control
  • Pain
  • Seizures
  • Respiratory symptoms
  • Need to measure outcomes against care pathways
  • Complementary and alternative therapies
  • What is used and with what effect?
  • Do families tell their doctors?

15
Satisfaction with service
  • Limited evidence for care outside hospital
  • Different models not evaluated
  • Mainly parent satisfaction
  • But not well defined muddled with QoL
  • Their perspective is different to childs
  • Multi dimensional concept
  • Main concerns (of adults carers)
  • Symptom control
  • Staff competence
  • Information provision

16
Quality of Life
  • Child
  • Difficult to measure in non-communicating child
  • Measures mainly disease specific but some generic
    measures available
  • Siblings
  • Better proxy for child than parents
  • Family
  • Coping strategies used
  • Normality promoted
  • Fathers and mothers cope differently

17
Parental mental health
  • Mental health compromised
  • Few targeted programmes in adult literature
  • Respite could help
  • Few studies on how
  • Programmes to support mental health interventions
    not evaluated

18
Respite care
  • No studies on effects on carers or outcomes
  • Hospices few evaluations, mainly based on
    retrospective studies of parents

19
Child as participant
  • QoL of child usually by proxy
  • Need to ask child and evaluate longitudinally
  • Sexuality of young people
  • Denied or neglected
  • Spirituality
  • Faith important to adults at this time
  • Lack of research and policy development for
    adolescents and young adults and at time of
    transition to adult care

20
Siblings
  • Interventions and outcomes not formally evaluated
  • Information sharing and home care important to
    siblings
  • Optimal coping strategies

21
End of life care
  • Infants who had palliative care had fewer
    interventions
  • Characteristics of a good death from families
    perspective
  • Empowering families to be in control

22
Community Childrens Nursing Teams
  • Many different models
  • Need to clarify optimum structure
  • Training and education needs
  • Few courses
  • Key workers

23
Hospital or Community
  • Children want to be at home
  • Parents want children to be at home
  • But fearful of symptoms at death
  • CCN services can support
  • Coping strategies need to be explored
  • Particularly fathers
  • Cost effectiveness of services to keep children
    at home unknown

24
Research potential
  • Came about due to National Lottery Funding in
    2003
  • Funded 71 community teams in England (and
    bereavement and hospices)
  • 48m for three years pump priming with PCTs
    taking over funding

25
Childrens Palliative Care Course
  • Offered to all successful NOF (BLF) Teams
  • Aims
  • Teaching
  • Evaluation
  • Networking and support
  • Sharing protocols/guidelines etc
  • 29 teams participated over three years

26
Research Programme at CCAH
  • National Evaluation
  • Local evaluation
  • Staff perspective on setting up and running a
    service
  • Impact on fathers of caring for a child with a LL
    condition
  • Complementary and Alternative Medicines
  • NIHR Programme bid

27
National Evaluation
  • Aims
  • Description of services
  • Description of the children and families who
    access these services
  • An assessment of the impact of these services on
    family functioning and well-being
  • Research questions and tools developed in
    collaboration with course members

28
  • Tools
  • Team structure questionnaire
  • Child and family information sheet
  • Diversity monitoring form
  • Various psychological tools e.g.
  • PedsQL
  • GHQ
  • HAD
  • PSI

29
Progress to date
  • 8 teams taking part in CFI data (Ethics and RD
    approvals)
  • Data collection in progress

30
Local Evaluation
  • Local Childrens Palliative Care Partnership
  • Social services (3 areas)
  • Lifetime Service (CCN Service)
  • Jessie May Trust (Hospice at Home)
  • Based on National Evaluation

31
Service Development
  • Funded by Queens Nursing Institute
  • Aim to investigate CCNs experience of setting
    up a service
  • Method telephone interviews
  • Output guidelines
  • Child Care, Health and Development article in
    press

32
Impact on Fathers
  • Avon Primary Care Research Collaborative funded
  • Aim to investigate and describe the impact on
    fathers of having a child with a life limiting
    condition
  • Method SS Interviews and PSI and IOF
  • Output Questionnaire for future national study
  • At data analysis stage

33
Research Needed
  • National strategy
  • Epidemiological studies
  • Mixed methodologies
  • National collaborations
  • Economic evaluations
  • Evaluation of interventions and training and
    education

34
NIHR Bid
  • Based on ACT Integrated Multi Agency Pathway for
    Children with LL and LT Conditions (2004)
  • Charts the journey of families with a child with
    LL or LT condition - key events
  • Diagnosis,
  • Ongoing care
  • End of life

35
  • Identifies 5 standards along the way
  • Prognosis breaking bad news
  • Transfer and liaison between hospital and
    community
  • Multidisciplinary assessment of needs
  • Child and family care plan
  • End of life plan
  • Economic evaluation
  • BME families

36
Conclusion
  • Size and nature of the problem
  • Literature review
  • Research programme
  • Education programme
  • Future research Programme

37
Thank you for listening
  • Contact details
  • Dr Nicola Eaton
  • Tel0117 33 10 8093
  • Mobile 07971 775682
  • Email nicola.eaton_at_uwe.ac.uk
About PowerShow.com